Striatal recruitment during an implicit sequence learning task as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging

Prior research has repeatedly implicated the striatum in implicit sequence learning; however, imaging findings have been inconclusive with respect to the sub‐territories and laterality involved. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we studied brain activation profiles associated with performance of the serial reaction time task (SRT) in 10 normal right‐handed males. Behavioral results indicate that significant implicit learning occurred, uncontaminated by significant explicit knowledge. Concatenated fMRI data from the entire cohort revealed significant right‐lateralized activation in both the caudate and putamen. Analysis of fMRI data from individual subjects showed inter‐individual variability as to the precise territories involved, including right as well as left caudate and putamen. Interestingly, all seven subjects who manifested robust learning effects exhibited significant activation within the putamen. Moreover, among those seven subjects, the magnitude of signal intensity change within the putamen correlated significantly with the magnitude of reaction time advantage achieved. These findings demonstrate right‐sided striatal activation across subjects during implicit sequence learning, but also highlight interindividual variability with respect to the laterality and striatal subterritories involved. In particular, results from individual subjects suggest that, during the SRT, the reaction time advantage garnered via implicit sequence learning might be predominantly associated with activity within the putamen. Hum. Brain Mapping 5:124–132, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  A PET investigation of implicit and explicit sequence learning , 1995 .

[2]  A. Reber Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[3]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional Mapping of Sequence Learning in Normal Humans , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  U. Mayr,et al.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  David A. Caulton,et al.  On the Modularity of Sequence Representation , 1995 .

[6]  Tim Curran,et al.  Implicit sequence learning from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: What, how, and where? , 1998 .

[7]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Evidence for dissociable motor skills in Huntington’s disease patients , 1993, Psychobiology.

[8]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  O Hikosaka,et al.  Functional properties of monkey caudate neurons. II. Visual and auditory responses. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Spatial versus Object Working Memory: PET Investigations , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Tim Curran,et al.  On The Neural Mechanisms of Sequence Learning , 1995 .

[15]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Motion detection and correction in functional MR imaging , 1995 .

[16]  A. Reber The cognitive unconscious: An evolutionary perspective , 1992, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Functional properties of monkey caudate neurons. I. Activities related to saccadic eye movements. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  L. Squire,et al.  Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness. , 1994, Learning & memory.

[20]  Joel L. Davis,et al.  Adaptive Critics and the Basal Ganglia , 1995 .

[21]  G. E. Alexander,et al.  Basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, "prefrontal" and "limbic" functions. , 1990, Progress in brain research.

[22]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Visuomotor Skill Learning in Human Subjects Examined with Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  Brent A. Vogt,et al.  Topography of diprenorphine binding in human cingulate gyrus and adjacent cortex derived from coregistered PET and MR images , 1995 .

[25]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Automated shimming at 1.5 t using echo‐planar image frequency maps , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  N. Alpert,et al.  Probing striatal function in obsessive compulsive disorder using PET and a sequence learning task , 1996, NeuroImage.

[28]  Peder J. Johnson,et al.  Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. , 1994 .

[29]  W. Rosen,et al.  Neuropsychological Assessment, 3rd Edition , 1996 .

[30]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[31]  M. Nissen,et al.  Procedural learning is impaired in Huntington's disease: Evidence from the serial reaction time task , 1991, Neuropsychologia.