Choice behavior of rats in a concurrent-chains schedule: Amount and delay of reinforcement.

Rats were exposed to concurrent-chains schedules in which the terminal links were equal fixed-interval schedules terminating in one or three food pellets. Choice proportions for large reward increased with increases in delay intervals programmed on fixed-interval schedules and supported the predictions derived from a general choice model originally formulated by Fantino and later developed by Navarick and Fantino. In addition, a functional equivalence of two alternatives was established by increasing delay intervals with large reward, whereas delay intervals for small reward were held constant. Functionally equivalent delay intervals with large reward, for each delay interval with small reward, can be described by a power function with exponent smaller than 1.0. A better prediction of choice proportions resulted when this function was used to derive predicted choice proportions.

[1]  G. Ainslie Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  N. Squires,et al.  Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Self-control and general models of choice. , 1976 .

[4]  F A LOGAN,et al.  DECISION MAKING BY RATS: DELAY VERSUS AMOUNT OF REWARD. , 1965, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  L Green,et al.  Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Choice between Rewards Differing in Amount and Delay: toward a Choice Model of Self Control , 2022 .

[6]  J C Todorov,et al.  Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performances. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  L. Green,et al.  Preference reversal and self control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay , 1981 .

[8]  F A LOGAN,et al.  DECISION MAKING BY RATS: UNCERTAIN OUTCOME CHOICES. , 1965, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  H Rachlin,et al.  Commitment, choice and self-control. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  J. W. Schneider Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  E. Fantino Choice and rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  G. Ainslie,et al.  Impulse control in pigeons. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  W M Baum,et al.  Choice as time allocation. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.