Reverberation time measurement by the product of two room impulse responses

Abstract The decay function for the evaluation of the reverberation time is often obtained by the method of the backward integration of a squared room impulse response as suggested by M.R. Schroeder more than four decades ago. Since then much work has been published about its implementation. However, soon after the initial exploitation of the method, it was realized that the effects of the background noise contaminating the room impulse response required a careful consideration for accomplishing better results. This paper describes an alternative method dealing with the problem of the backward integration of noisy room impulse responses. This method is based on the processing of two impulse responses sequentially recorded for a fixed source and receiver arrangement in a room. Statistical criteria are proposed to identify how the effect of the noise corrupts the level decay curve using a noise-free synthesized room impulse response as well as measurements performed in a real room.

[1]  Ning Xiang,et al.  Evaluation of decay times in coupled spaces: Bayesian decay model selection. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  M. Schroeder New Method of Measuring Reverberation Time , 1965 .

[3]  C Ianniello,et al.  The acoustics of the renovated auditorium of the production centre of the Italian radio and television (RAI) in Naples (Italy) , 2006 .

[4]  D. Morgan A parametric error analysis of the backward integration method for reverberation time estimation , 1997 .

[5]  K. Bodlund On the use of the integrated impulse response method for laboratory reverberation measurements , 1978 .

[6]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR MEASURING REVERBERATION TIME , 1994 .

[7]  W. T. Chu Comparison of reverberation measurements using Schroeder's impulse method and a decay-curve averaging method , 1977 .

[8]  M. Schroeder Integrated‐impulse method measuring sound decay without using impulses , 1979 .

[9]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  Uncertainties of Measurements in Room Acoustics , 1995 .

[10]  N. Xiang Evaluation of reverberation times using a nonlinear regression approach , 1995 .

[11]  Matti Karjalainen,et al.  Estimation of Modal Decay Parameters from Noisy Response Measurements , 2002 .

[12]  Swen Müller,et al.  Transfer-Function Measurement with Sweeps , 2001 .

[13]  Robert Ruiz,et al.  Optimization of the impulse response length : Application to noisy and highly reverberant rooms , 1998 .

[14]  John S. Bradley Optimizing the Decay Range in Room Acoustics Measurements Using Maximum-Length-Sequence Techniques , 1996 .

[15]  Heinrich Kuttruff,et al.  Room acoustics , 1973 .

[16]  Y. Hirata A method of eliminating noise in power responses , 1982 .

[17]  Robert B. Newman,et al.  Collected Papers on Acoustics , 1927 .

[18]  Wing T. Chu Impulse-response and reverberation-decay measurements made by using a periodic pseudorandom sequence , 1990 .