Looking past yesterday's tomorrow: using futures studies methods to extend the research horizon

Doing research is, in part, an act of foresight. Even though it is not explicit in many projects, we especially value research that is still relevant five, ten or more years after it is completed. However, published research in the field of interactive computing (and technology research in general) often lacks evidence of systematic thinking about the long-term impacts of current trends. For example, trends on an exponential curve change much more rapidly than intuition predicts. As a result, research may accidentally emphasize near-term thinking. When thinking about the future is approached systematically, we can critically examine multiple potential futures, expand the set of externalities under consideration, and address both negative and positive forecasts of the future. The field of Futures Studies provides methods that can support analysis of long-term trends, support the identification of new research areas and guide design and evaluation. We survey methods for futuristic thinking and discuss their relationship to Human Computer Interaction. Using the sustainability domain an example, we present a case study of a Futures Studies approach - the Delphi Method. We show how Futures Studies can be incorporated into Human Computer Interaction and highlight future work such as rethinking the role of externalities in the validation process.

[1]  William Buxton,et al.  Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time) , 2008, CHI.

[2]  Lynn Spigel,et al.  Yesterday's Future, Tomorrow's Home , 2001 .

[3]  J. Tambling How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics by N. Katherine Hayles (review) , 2001, Modern Language Review.

[4]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[5]  Philip E. Agre,et al.  Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform AI , 2006 .

[6]  Jeffrey Bardzell,et al.  Interaction criticism and aesthetics , 2009, CHI.

[7]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach , 2006 .

[8]  Wendell Bell,et al.  What do we mean by futures studies , 2002 .

[9]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Knowledge-based augmented reality , 1993, CACM.

[10]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[11]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Divining a Digital Future - Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing , 2011 .

[12]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World , 2002 .

[13]  Peter C. Bishop Foundations of futures studies: Human sciences for a new era, vol. 1: History, purposes, and knowledge , 1997 .

[14]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  At Home with Ubiquitous Computing: Seven Challenges , 2001, UbiComp.

[15]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[16]  R. Kurzweil,et al.  The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology , 2006 .

[17]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  Reflexivity in digital anthropology , 2011, CHI.

[18]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Rapidly Exploring Application Design Through Speed Dating , 2007, UbiComp.

[19]  Paul Dourish,et al.  “Resistance is futile”: reading science fiction alongside ubiquitous computing , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[20]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  The Patient from Hell: How I Worked with My Doctors to Get the Best of Modern Medicine and How You Can Too , 2005 .

[21]  D. Meadows,et al.  The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. , 1972 .

[22]  Wendell Bell Foundations of Futures Studies , 1996 .

[23]  George Wright,et al.  The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis , 1999 .

[24]  C. Richard Talley,et al.  Radical Evolution: The Promise and Peril of Enhancing Our Minds, Our Bodies—and What It Means To Be Human , 2005 .

[25]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  The Changing Face of Human-Computer Interaction in the Age of Ubiquitous Computing , 2009, USAB.

[26]  Predrag V. Klasnja,et al.  Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design , 2008, DIS '08.

[27]  Jenny Andersson The future landscape , 2008 .

[28]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[29]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  Exiting the Cleanroom: On Ecological Validity and Ubiquitous Computing , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[30]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[31]  Philip J. Vergragt,et al.  Backcasting for Industrial Transformations and System Innovations Towards Sustainability: Relevance for Governance? , 2004 .

[32]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Pastiche scenarios: Fiction as a resource for user centred design , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[33]  Humphrey Hodgson Apocalypse - when? , 2013, Clinical medicine.

[34]  Christine Reid,et al.  The Myth of the Paperless Office , 2003, J. Documentation.

[35]  W. A. Wagenaar,et al.  Misperception of exponential growth , 1975 .

[36]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Being Human: HCI in the Year 2020. , 2008 .

[37]  P. Nicholls Science or science fiction? , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[38]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[39]  Dan R. Olsen,et al.  Evaluating user interface systems research , 2007, UIST.

[40]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[41]  Owen Conlan,et al.  A simulation-based approach to highly iterative prototyping of ubiquitous computing systems , 2009, SimuTools.

[42]  J. Barlow,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2003 .

[43]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse , 2007, CHI.

[44]  J. Dator Introduction: The Future Lies Behind! Thirty Years of Teaching Futures Studies , 1998 .

[45]  Richard A. Slaughter,et al.  New thinking for a new millennium , 1996 .

[46]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[47]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Damaged Merchandise? A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[48]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[49]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[50]  K. Rudnick The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings , 1993 .

[51]  Philip E. Agre,et al.  Real-Time Politics: The Internet and the Political Process , 2002, Inf. Soc..