Arguing on the Toulmin Model

As my book The Uses of Argument pointed out, we must look and see how our critical standards vary from one area or activity to another—e.g. from politics to aesthetics. Hence we need to explore how these critical standards evolve, and how the most reflective and best-informed people in any area of experience refine those standards. We cannot understand where we are now unless we understand how we got here, even in a field like mathematics. Hence we must modestly recognize that the best we can do now is the best we can do now; and that those who come after us will move beyond our ideas. There is much contingency in these historical developments.

[1]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  A Logic for Default Reasoning , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[3]  D. Medin,et al.  Decision making from a cognitive perspective , 1995 .

[4]  Giambattista Vico The Art of Rhetoric , 1996 .

[5]  John Fox,et al.  A Unified Framework for Hypothetical and Practical Reasoning (1): Theoretical Foundations , 1996, FAPR.

[6]  Wendy Kennett The Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice: A Contribution to Legal Theory and European Community Law . By Joxerramon Bengoetxea [Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1993. xvi, 275, (References) 12 and (General Index) 6pp. Hardback £35.00 net. ISBN 019–825717–1.] , 1993 .

[7]  Dolf Zillmann,et al.  Rhetorical Elicitation of Agreement in Persuasion. , 1972 .

[8]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Trade-Off Manipulations in the Development of Negotiation Decision Support Systems , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Bart Verheij Virtual Arguments: On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers , 2005 .

[11]  Jörg Meibauer A. RHETORISCHE FRAGEN , 1986 .

[12]  Jennifer L. Bevan,et al.  Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[13]  M. Crowe Ten “Laws” concerning patterns of change in the history of mathematics , 1975 .

[14]  S. Parsons,et al.  A Framework for Deliberation Dialogues , 2001 .

[15]  Ronald Prescott Loui,et al.  Hart's critics on defeasible concepts and ascriptivism , 1995, ICAIL '95.

[16]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Revising Beliefs Through Arguments: Bridging the Gap Between Argumentation and Belief Revision in MAS , 2004, ArgMAS.

[17]  H. Siegel Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking and Education , 1988 .

[18]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law , 1997 .

[19]  Andrew Aberdein The Informal Logic Of Mathematical Proof , 2007, Perspectives On Mathematical Practices.

[20]  Craig Boutilier,et al.  A Unified Model of Qualitative Belief Change: A Dynamical Systems Perspective , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[21]  Stephen N. Thomas,et al.  Practical Reasoning in Natural Language , 1981 .

[22]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  On the processing of arguments , 1993 .

[23]  S. Brewer,et al.  Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force of Legal Argument by Analogy , 1996 .

[24]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  The Philosophical Basis of Observation in Science and Science Education. , 1985 .

[25]  H. B. Verheij Rules, reasons, arguments : formal studies of argumentation and defeat , 1996 .

[26]  George Macdonald Ross,et al.  Leibniz: An Introduction to his Philosophy. , 1981 .

[27]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  A hybrid rule – neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[28]  James B. Freeman,et al.  What Types of Statements are There? , 2000 .

[29]  R. Tweney Faraday’s Discovery of Induction: A Cognitive Approach , 1985 .

[30]  David Hitchcock Fallacies and formal logic in Aristotle , 2000 .

[31]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon Specification and Implementation of Toulmin Dialogue Game , 1999 .

[32]  F. Butzen,et al.  The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability Before Pascal , 2002 .

[33]  David Hitchcock,et al.  Sampling scholarly arguments: a test of a theory of good inference , 2001 .

[34]  G. Thomas Goodnight,et al.  Legitimation Inferences: An Additional Component for the Toulmin Model , 1993 .

[35]  John L. Pollock,et al.  Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification , 2001, Artif. Intell..

[36]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  Copyright Regulation with Argumentation Agents , 2001 .

[37]  M. Scriven The philosophy of critical thinking and informal logic [Unpublished manuscript] , 1995 .

[38]  D. Walton Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .

[39]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Concepts of risk : a classification , 1992 .

[40]  Chris Reed,et al.  Araucaria: Software for Puzzles in Argument Diagramming and XML , 2001 .

[41]  Kevin D. Ashley Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals , 1991, Artificial intelligence and legal reasoning.

[42]  A. Goldman The Unity of the Epistemic Virtues , 2002 .

[43]  Fabio Paglieri,et al.  Data-oriented Belief Revision : Towards a Unified Theory of Epistemic Processing , 2004 .

[44]  C. C. Marshall,et al.  Representing the structure of a legal argument , 1989, ICAIL '89.

[45]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[46]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  The Structure of Science , 1962 .

[47]  Dale Hample,et al.  The Toulmin Model and the Syllogism , 1977 .

[48]  M. Bacharach Two-person Cooperative Games , 1976 .

[49]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  From a Logical Point of View , 1955 .

[50]  Bart Verheij,et al.  DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[51]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Reasons: belief support and goal dynamics , 1996 .

[52]  D. Medin,et al.  Comments on part I: psychological essentialism , 1989 .

[53]  Martha Kneale,et al.  The development of logic , 1963 .

[54]  Michael Clark,et al.  Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory , 1980 .

[55]  P G rdenfors,et al.  Knowledge in flux: modeling the dynamics of epistemic states , 1988 .

[56]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  The fallacy of fallacies , 1987 .

[57]  James B. Freeman,et al.  Relevance, warrants, backing, inductive support , 1992 .

[58]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning , 1995 .

[59]  C. Tindale Acts of arguing : a rhetorical model of argument , 1999 .

[60]  Emil L. Post Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems , 1944 .

[61]  Druin Burch Two concepts of liberty , 2004, The Lancet.

[62]  John Hayden Woods,et al.  Paradox and paraconsistency - conflict resolution in the abstract sciences , 2002 .

[63]  C. A. J. Coady,et al.  Testimony: A Philosophical Study. , 1994 .

[64]  E. Zemach Human understanding , 1992, Synthese.

[65]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Representations of the Gulf Crisis as Derived from the U.S. Senate Debate , 1998 .

[66]  Dale Jacquette,et al.  Two Sides of Any Issue , 2007 .

[67]  John Fox,et al.  A LOGIC OF ARGUMENTATION FOR REASONING UNDER UNCERTAINTY , 1995, Comput. Intell..

[68]  Jimmie D. Trent Toulmin's model of an argument: An examination and extension , 1968 .

[69]  Harvey Siegel,et al.  Instrumental Rationality and Naturalized Philosophy of Science , 1996, Philosophy of Science.

[70]  W. Slob,et al.  How to Distinguish Good and Bad Arguments: Dialogico-Rhetorical Normativity , 2002 .

[71]  M. Heesacker,et al.  Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. , 1981 .

[72]  Bart Verheij,et al.  Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic , 2003, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[73]  Henry Prakken,et al.  A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning , 1996, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[74]  Eveline T. Feteris,et al.  A Survey of 25 Years of Research on Legal Argumentation , 1997 .

[75]  Stephen Toulmin,et al.  The Fabric of the Heavens , 1961 .

[76]  J. L. Austin,et al.  The foundations of arithmetic : a logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number , 1951 .

[77]  Des Gasper,et al.  Analyzing Argumentation in Planning and Public Policy: Assessing, Improving, and Transcending the Toulmin Model , 1998 .

[78]  D. Hitchcock,et al.  Evidence Based Practice: Logic And Critical Thinking In Medicine , 2004 .

[79]  L. Goble The Blackwell guide to philosophical logic , 2001 .

[80]  Henry Prakken,et al.  An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning , 2002, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[81]  D. Schum,et al.  A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence , 1996 .

[82]  David M. Godden,et al.  Psychologism in the Logic of John Stuart Mill: Mill on the Subject Matter and Foundations of Ratiocinative Logic , 2005 .

[83]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Argument-based explanation of logic programs , 1991, Knowl. Based Syst..

[84]  Stephen Toulmin,et al.  Wittgenstein's Vienna , 1973 .

[85]  Robert H. Ennis Applying Soundness Standards to Qualified Reasoning , 2004 .

[86]  Paul J. Krause,et al.  Dialectic reasoning with inconsistent information , 1993, UAI.

[87]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  The Split-up Project: Induction, Context and Knowledge Discovery in Law , 2004 .

[88]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation , 1989 .

[89]  Paul Bergman,et al.  Trial advocacy in a nutshell , 1989 .

[90]  Antonis C. Kakas,et al.  Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[91]  Judith P. Dick,et al.  Conceptual retrieval and case law , 1987, ICAIL '87.

[92]  James B. Freeman,et al.  Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments , 1991 .

[93]  Bart Verheij,et al.  Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[94]  T. Govier Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation , 2018 .

[95]  Ana Gabriela Maguitman,et al.  Logical models of argument , 2000, CSUR.

[96]  John Cantwell,et al.  Resolving Conflicting Information , 1998, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[97]  James Griffin,et al.  Are There Incommensurable Values , 1988 .

[98]  L. Cohen,et al.  Are People Programmed to Commit Fallacies? Further Thoughts about the Interpretation of Experimental Data on Probability Judgment , 1982 .

[99]  John Fox,et al.  Safe and sound - artificial intelligence in hazardous applications , 2000 .

[100]  John Fox,et al.  Arguing about beliefs and actions , 1998, Applications of Uncertainty Formalisms.

[101]  Ian Mueller,et al.  Philosophy of mathematics and deductive structure in Euclid's Elements , 1981 .

[102]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge , 1977 .

[103]  Paul J. Krause,et al.  Argumentation as a General Framework for Uncertain Reasoning , 1993, UAI.

[104]  John Fox,et al.  Arguments, Contradicitions and Practical Reasoning , 1992, ECAI.

[105]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  Defining observational competence , 1984 .

[106]  Antonis C. Kakas,et al.  Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Robert A. Kowalski, Part I , 2002 .

[107]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  The reach of abduction : insight and trial , 2005 .

[108]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Is there a Burden of Questioning? , 2004, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[109]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Representation and Integration of Multiple Knowledge Sources: Issues and Questions , 1997 .

[110]  S. Poirier Foundations of mathematics , 2007 .

[111]  J Austoker,et al.  Computer support for interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care: comparative study with simulated cases , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[112]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Family_Winner: Integrating Game Theory and Heuristics to Provide Negotiation Support , 2003 .

[113]  Ronald Prescott Loui,et al.  Rationales and argument moves , 1995, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[114]  Peter McBurney,et al.  Chapter 3 DECISION SUPPORT FOR PRACTICAL REASONING A Theoretical and Computational Perspective , 2008 .

[115]  George C. Christie An Essay on Discretion , 1986 .

[116]  J. Raz,et al.  Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action , 2001 .

[117]  Rolf George Bolzano's consequence, relevance, and enthymemes , 1983, J. Philos. Log..

[118]  Maria Simosi Using Toulmin's Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations , 2003 .

[119]  D. Shapere The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy , 1982 .

[120]  Douglas Walton Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation , 1991 .

[121]  Karl Branting,et al.  An Agenda for Empirical Research in AI and Law , 2003, Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems.

[122]  D. Hofstadter,et al.  Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1979 .

[123]  John L. Pollock,et al.  Belief Revision And Epistemology , 2000, Synthese.

[124]  Edwina L. Rissland,et al.  Arguments and cases: An inevitable intertwining , 1992, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[125]  C. Ilie What else can I tell you?: A pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative acts , 1994 .

[126]  A. F. Snoeck Henkemans,et al.  Clues for reconstructing symptomatic argumentation , 2002 .

[127]  Renata Wassermann Resource Bounded Belief Revision , 1999 .

[128]  Bernard Hoose,et al.  The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning , 1991 .

[129]  David Hitchcock,et al.  Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model , 2005, Arguing on the Toulmin Model.

[130]  Hilary Kornblith,et al.  Inductive Inference and Its Natural Ground: An Essay in Naturalistic Epistemology , 1993 .

[131]  Andrew S. Coulson,et al.  RAGs: A Novel Approach to Computerized Genetic Risk Assessment and Decision Support from Pedigrees , 2001, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[132]  Don Fallis,et al.  Intentional Gaps In Mathematical Proofs , 2004, Synthese.

[133]  Luuk Matthijssen,et al.  Interfacing Between Lawyers and Computers: An Architecture for Knowledge-based Interfaces to Legal Databases , 1999 .

[134]  Rolf A. Eberle Replacing One Theory by Another under Preservation of a Given Feature , 1971, Philosophy of Science.

[135]  Bart Verheij Legal decision making as dialectical theory construction with argumentation schemes , 2001, ICAIL '01.

[136]  U. Eco,et al.  La Ricerca della Lingua Perfetta nella Cultura Europea , 1993 .

[137]  Robert C. Pinto Truth and Premiss Adequacy , 2001 .

[138]  Christopher Schroeder,et al.  Knowledge and Power, Logic and Rhetoric, and Other Reflections in the Toulminian Mirror: A Critical Consideration of Stephen Toulmin's Contributions to Composition. , 1997 .

[139]  S. Toulmin,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Does the Distinction between Normal and Revolutionary Science Hold Water? , 1970 .

[140]  Mark Weinstein,et al.  Towards a Research Agenda for Informal Logic and Critical Thinking , 1990 .

[141]  John L. Pollock,et al.  Defeasible Reasoning , 2020, Synthese Library.

[142]  Jaap Hage,et al.  Dialectical models in artificial intelligence and law , 2000, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[143]  Maurice A. Finocchiaro,et al.  Two Empirical Approaches to the Study of Reasoning , 1994 .

[144]  D. S. Clarke Rational acceptance and purpose : an outline of a pragmatist epistemology , 1989 .

[145]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game , 2004, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[146]  G. M.,et al.  The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements , 1909, Nature.

[147]  D. Rutherford,et al.  Philosophy and language in Leibniz , 1994 .

[148]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Acceptable premises. An epistemic approach to an informal logic problem. , 2006 .

[149]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Practical Reasoning and Acceptance in a Context , 1992 .

[150]  Paul J. Krause,et al.  Acceptability of arguments as 'logical uncertainty' , 1993, ECSQARU.

[151]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers , 2001 .

[152]  Joseph W. Wenzel On Fields of Argument as Propositional Systems , 1982 .

[153]  Gregg B. Walker,et al.  Generic Argument and Argument Fields. , 1987 .

[154]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  WebShell: The development of web based expert systems , 2002 .

[155]  Maria Jean Johnstone Hall,et al.  The Development and Rapid Evolution of the Knowledge Model of ADVOKATE: An Advisory System to Assess the Credibility of Eyewitness Testimony , 2002 .

[156]  Thomas F. Gordon,et al.  Pleadings game - an artificial intelligence model of procedural justice , 1995 .

[157]  Robert Brandom,et al.  Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality , 2002 .

[158]  Ralph S. Hambrick,et al.  A guide for the analysis of policy arguments , 1974 .

[159]  Peter Kosso,et al.  Knowing the Past: Philosophical Issues of History and Archaeology , 2001 .

[160]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law , 1997, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[161]  中野 真宏,et al.  "The Random House Dictionary of the English Language"に於ける新語の実例 , 1968 .

[162]  John Fox,et al.  REACT - A Decision-support System for Medical Planning , 2001, AMIA.

[163]  R. Brandom,et al.  Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism , 2002 .

[164]  D. Hitchcock Toulmin’s Warrants , 2003 .

[165]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Handbook of Argumentation Theory: A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies , 1987 .

[166]  G. Thomas Goodnight,et al.  The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument: A Speculative Inquiry into the Art of Public Deliberation , 1982 .

[167]  Andrew Aberdein,et al.  Managing Informal Mathematical Knowledge: Techniques from Informal Logic , 2006, MKM.

[168]  Bart Verheij Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme , 2005 .

[169]  Tim van Gelder,et al.  Enhancing Deliberation Through Computer Supported Argument Visualization , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.

[170]  Wayne Grennan,et al.  Informal Logic: Issues and Techniques , 1997 .

[171]  L. S. Lutomski,et al.  The design of an attorney's statistical consultant , 1989, ICAIL '89.

[172]  John Kingston,et al.  Prototyping a Legal Decision Support System: A Case Study , 2002 .

[173]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[174]  P. Houtlosser,et al.  Indicators of a point of view , 2002 .

[175]  Gerald R. Williams Legal negotiation and settlement , 1983 .

[176]  A. Lodder DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation , 1999 .

[177]  Dominic A. Clark,et al.  Using predicate logic to integrate qualitative reasoning and classical decision theory , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[178]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[179]  R. Alexy A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification , 1989, The Cambridge Law Journal.

[180]  John E. Woods,et al.  The death of argument - fallacies in agent based reasoning , 2004, Applied logic series.

[181]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations , 2003, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[182]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions , 1985, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[183]  Geoffrey A. Flick Natural justice: Principles and practical application , 1984 .

[184]  William J. Ball,et al.  Using Virgil to Analyze Public Policy Arguments: A System Based on Toulmin's Informal Logic , 1994 .

[185]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence , 2003, ICAIL.

[186]  Charles Arthur Willard,et al.  On the utility of descriptive diagrams for the analysis and criticism of arguments , 1976 .

[187]  Robert H. Ennis Identifying implicit assumptions , 1982, Synthese.

[188]  Douglas Walton,et al.  The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument , 1998 .

[189]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[190]  Alan R. White,et al.  Taking Rights Seriously. , 1977 .

[191]  David Hitchcock,et al.  13. The Peculiarities of Stoic Propositional Logic , 2005 .

[192]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  A Strategy for Evaluating Web-Based Discretionary Decision Support Systems , 2002, ADBIS Research Communications.

[193]  J. F. Voss,et al.  Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels , 1996 .

[194]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Logics for Defeasible Argumentation , 2001 .

[195]  Chris Reed,et al.  Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and Representation , 2004, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[196]  Timothy A. Post,et al.  Problem-Solving Skill in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[197]  Robert C. Rowland,et al.  The Influence of Purpose on Fields of Argument , 1982 .

[198]  H. C. Bertuccelli What is an Argument? , 1989, APL.

[199]  Gerard Vreeswijk,et al.  Abstract Argumentation Systems , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[200]  Concha Roldán Panadero Theoria cum praxi: la vuelta a la complejidad (apuntes para una filosofía práctica desde el perspectivismo leibniziano) , 1997 .

[201]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective , 1992 .

[202]  J. F. Voss,et al.  Learning to Reason via Instruction in Argumentation. , 1991 .

[203]  Hans V. Hansen The Straw Thing of Fallacy Theory: The Standard Definition of 'Fallacy' , 2002 .

[204]  H. Laurence Ross,et al.  Settled Out of Court , 1980 .

[205]  J. Anthony Blair Presumptive Reasoning/Argument: An Overlooked Class , 1999 .

[206]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  Using Argumentation for the Decomposition and Classification of Tasks for Hybrid System Development , 1997, ICONIP.

[207]  Wilfrid S. Sellars Induction as Vindication , 1964 .

[208]  Jaap Hage,et al.  Reasoning with Rules , 1997 .

[209]  ALMUTH GRÉSILLON ZUM LINGUISTISCHEN STATUS RHETORISCHER FRAGEN , 1980 .

[210]  John Woods,et al.  Quantum Logic and the Unity of Science , 2004, Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science.

[211]  J. Hage Reasoning with Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic , 1996 .

[212]  Robert H. Ennis Argument appraisal strategy: A comprehensive approach , 2001 .

[213]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Developing Negotiation Decision Support Systems that Support Mediators: A Case Study of the Family_Winner System , 2005, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[214]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-Step Model , 2007 .

[215]  H. Reichenbach The rise of scientific philosophy , 1952 .

[216]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[217]  Manfred Kienpointner Alltagslogik : Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern , 1992 .

[218]  S. Toulmin,et al.  The tyranny of principles. , 1981, The Hastings Center report.

[219]  H. Prakken Analysing reasoning about evidence with formal models of argumentation , 2004 .

[220]  Robert H. Ennis A Conception of Deductive Logic Competence , 1981 .

[221]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[222]  D. Walton A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy , 1995 .

[223]  C. Tindale,et al.  `Hidden' or `Missing' Premises , 1985 .

[224]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning , 2001, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[225]  Robert C. Pinto,et al.  Reasoning: A Practical Guide for Canadian Students , 1993 .

[226]  J. Wisdom Other Minds , 1941, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures.

[227]  R. Chisholm Perceiving: A Philosophical Study , 1958 .

[228]  Maurice Pagnucco,et al.  The Role of Abductive Reasoning within the Process of Belief Revision , 1996 .

[229]  Ralph H. Johnson Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument , 2000 .

[230]  Charles Arthur Willard Argumentation and the social grounds of knowledge , 1982 .

[231]  S. Toulmin The Language of Morals , 1954, Philosophy.

[232]  J. Searle Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts , 1979 .

[233]  S. Hansson A Survey of non-Prioritized Belief Revision , 1999 .

[234]  David Zarefsky,et al.  Persistent Questions in the Theory of Argument Fields , 1982 .

[235]  Karl Branting,et al.  A computational model of ratio decidendi , 2004, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[236]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  Observation Ability: Determining and Extending Its Presence , 1984 .

[237]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Indirect Speech Acts , 2001, Synthese.

[238]  Jurgen Schmidt-Radefeldt On so-called ‘rhetorical’ questions☆ , 1977 .

[239]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  An Australian Perspective on Research and Development Required for the Construction of Applied Legal Decision Support Systems , 2002, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[240]  J. Frank You Call That a Rhetorical Question? Forms and Functions of Rhetorical Questions in Conversation , 1990 .

[241]  Walter Sinnott-Armstrong,et al.  Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule‐based Decision‐Making in Law and in Life , 1992 .

[242]  Douglas W. Ehninger,et al.  Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and application , 1960 .

[243]  Aldo Franco Dragoni,et al.  Distributed Belief Revision , 2004, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[244]  Peter Clark,et al.  A model of argumentation and its application in a cooperative expert system , 1991 .

[245]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  The generalizability of critical thinking : multiple perspectives on an educational ideal , 1992 .

[246]  M. Grace A logical point of view , 2003, British Dental Journal.

[247]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Arguing about cases as practical reasoning , 2005, ICAIL '05.

[248]  Jack Kaminsky Making it Explicit , 1999 .

[249]  G. I. Anzilotti The Rhetorical Question as an Indirect Speech Device in English and Italian , 1982 .

[250]  B. Burleson On the Analysis and Criticism of Arguments: Some Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .

[251]  Chris Reed,et al.  On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments , 2004 .

[252]  C. Peirce,et al.  Philosophical Writings of Peirce , 1955 .

[253]  Imran A. Zualkernan,et al.  Types of Expertise: An Invariant of Problem Solving , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[254]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[255]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  What Was Aristotle Doing in His Early Logic, Anyway? a Reply to Woods and Hansen , 1997, Synthese.

[256]  Jörg Gebhardt,et al.  Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty , 1995, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[257]  Donald H. Berman,et al.  Indeterminacy: A challenge to logic‐based models of legal reasoning , 1987 .

[258]  Leo Groarke,et al.  Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics , 1999 .

[259]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[260]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system , 1999, ICAIL '99.

[261]  Robert C. Pinto Argument Schemes and the Evaluation of Presumptive Reasoning: some Reflections on Blair’s Account , 1999 .

[262]  D. Walton,et al.  Fallacies : Selected Papers 1972-1982 , 1989 .

[263]  John Woods,et al.  Dialectical Considerations on the Logic of Contradiction: Part I , 2005, Log. J. IGPL.

[264]  Eleonore Stump,et al.  Boethius's in Ciceronis Topica , 1989 .

[265]  Arthur N. Kruger,et al.  The Nature of Controversial Statements. , 1975 .

[266]  M. Nussbaum,et al.  Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. , 1992 .

[267]  A. Marty Getting to YES. Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In , 1983 .

[268]  F. Paglieri,et al.  Arguments as Belief Structures: Towards a Toulmin Layout of Doxastic Dynamics? , 2005 .

[269]  Hans Rott,et al.  Change, choice and inference - a study of belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning , 2001, Oxford logic guides.

[270]  I. A. Omer On the D-N Model of Scientific Explanation , 1970, Philosophy of Science.

[271]  A. Grant,et al.  Alternative dispute resolution. , 1995, The Canadian nurse.

[272]  Wouter Slob,et al.  The Voice of the Other: A Dialogico-Rhetorical Understanding of Opponent and of Toulmin's Rebuttal , 2006, Arguing on the Toulmin Model.

[273]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[274]  Charles Arthur Willard Argument Fields and Theories of Logical Types , 1981 .

[275]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach , 2003 .

[276]  Chris Reed,et al.  Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions , 2003 .

[277]  Ezequiel de Olaso ¿Cómo discutir con los escépticos? El caso de Leibniz , 1995 .

[278]  Wilfrid S. Sellars Concepts as Involving Laws and Inconceivable without Them , 1948, Philosophy of Science.

[279]  Joanne Cantor,et al.  Rhetorical Elicitation of Concession in Persuasion , 1974 .

[280]  Ronald Prescott Loui,et al.  Process and Policy: Resource‐Bounded NonDemonstrative Reasoning , 1998, Comput. Intell..

[281]  M. Fuhrmann,et al.  Die antike Rhetorik : eine Einführung , 2008 .

[282]  R. Bush,et al.  The promise of mediation : responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition , 1994 .

[283]  John Woods Epistemic Bubbles , 2005, We Will Show Them!.

[284]  Robert R. O'Toole,et al.  The megarians and the stoics , 2001, Greek, Indian and Arabic Logic.

[285]  Dominic A. Clark,et al.  Representing uncertain knowledge - an artificial intelligence approach , 1993 .

[286]  Douglas R. Hofstadter,et al.  Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1981 .

[287]  Kat Margaret Phifer “Euclid and His Modern Rivals” , 1879, Nature.

[288]  Joel W. Robbin,et al.  Mathematical logic: a first course , 1969 .

[289]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Plausible deniability and evasion of burden of proof , 1996 .

[290]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Towards a plea bargaining decision support system for Legal Aid lawyers in Victorian lower courts , 2005 .

[291]  F. C. P. Motta The theory of communicative action , 1991 .

[292]  J. Fox,et al.  Evaluation of computer support for prescribing (CAPSULE) using simulated cases , 1997, BMJ.

[293]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  Supporting discretionary decision-making with information technology: a case study in the criminal sentencing jurisdiction , 2005 .