Arguing on the Toulmin Model
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Paul J. Feltovich,et al. Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..
[2] Raymond Reiter,et al. A Logic for Default Reasoning , 1987, Artif. Intell..
[3] D. Medin,et al. Decision making from a cognitive perspective , 1995 .
[4] Giambattista Vico. The Art of Rhetoric , 1996 .
[5] John Fox,et al. A Unified Framework for Hypothetical and Practical Reasoning (1): Theoretical Foundations , 1996, FAPR.
[6] Wendy Kennett. The Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice: A Contribution to Legal Theory and European Community Law . By Joxerramon Bengoetxea [Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1993. xvi, 275, (References) 12 and (General Index) 6pp. Hardback £35.00 net. ISBN 019–825717–1.] , 1993 .
[7] Dolf Zillmann,et al. Rhetorical Elicitation of Agreement in Persuasion. , 1972 .
[8] John Zeleznikow,et al. Trade-Off Manipulations in the Development of Negotiation Decision Support Systems , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[9] Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al. Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning , 2002, Artif. Intell..
[10] Bart Verheij. Virtual Arguments: On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers , 2005 .
[11] Jörg Meibauer. A. RHETORISCHE FRAGEN , 1986 .
[12] Jennifer L. Bevan,et al. Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research. , 2005, Social science & medicine.
[13] M. Crowe. Ten “Laws” concerning patterns of change in the history of mathematics , 1975 .
[14] S. Parsons,et al. A Framework for Deliberation Dialogues , 2001 .
[15] Ronald Prescott Loui,et al. Hart's critics on defeasible concepts and ascriptivism , 1995, ICAIL '95.
[16] Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al. Revising Beliefs Through Arguments: Bridging the Gap Between Argumentation and Belief Revision in MAS , 2004, ArgMAS.
[17] H. Siegel. Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking and Education , 1988 .
[18] Henry Prakken,et al. Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law , 1997 .
[19] Andrew Aberdein. The Informal Logic Of Mathematical Proof , 2007, Perspectives On Mathematical Practices.
[20] Craig Boutilier,et al. A Unified Model of Qualitative Belief Change: A Dynamical Systems Perspective , 1998, Artif. Intell..
[21] Stephen N. Thomas,et al. Practical Reasoning in Natural Language , 1981 .
[22] Jennifer Wiley,et al. On the processing of arguments , 1993 .
[23] S. Brewer,et al. Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force of Legal Argument by Analogy , 1996 .
[24] Stephen P. Norris,et al. The Philosophical Basis of Observation in Science and Science Education. , 1985 .
[25] H. B. Verheij. Rules, reasons, arguments : formal studies of argumentation and defeat , 1996 .
[26] George Macdonald Ross,et al. Leibniz: An Introduction to his Philosophy. , 1981 .
[27] Andrew Stranieri,et al. A hybrid rule – neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[28] James B. Freeman,et al. What Types of Statements are There? , 2000 .
[29] R. Tweney. Faraday’s Discovery of Induction: A Cognitive Approach , 1985 .
[30] David Hitchcock. Fallacies and formal logic in Aristotle , 2000 .
[31] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Specification and Implementation of Toulmin Dialogue Game , 1999 .
[32] F. Butzen,et al. The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability Before Pascal , 2002 .
[33] David Hitchcock,et al. Sampling scholarly arguments: a test of a theory of good inference , 2001 .
[34] G. Thomas Goodnight,et al. Legitimation Inferences: An Additional Component for the Toulmin Model , 1993 .
[35] John L. Pollock,et al. Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification , 2001, Artif. Intell..
[36] Andrew Stranieri,et al. Copyright Regulation with Argumentation Agents , 2001 .
[37] M. Scriven. The philosophy of critical thinking and informal logic [Unpublished manuscript] , 1995 .
[38] D. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .
[39] Ortwin Renn,et al. Concepts of risk : a classification , 1992 .
[40] Chris Reed,et al. Araucaria: Software for Puzzles in Argument Diagramming and XML , 2001 .
[41] Kevin D. Ashley. Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals , 1991, Artificial intelligence and legal reasoning.
[42] A. Goldman. The Unity of the Epistemic Virtues , 2002 .
[43] Fabio Paglieri,et al. Data-oriented Belief Revision : Towards a Unified Theory of Epistemic Processing , 2004 .
[44] C. C. Marshall,et al. Representing the structure of a legal argument , 1989, ICAIL '89.
[45] Michael Wooldridge,et al. Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues , 2003, J. Log. Comput..
[46] Ernest Nagel,et al. The Structure of Science , 1962 .
[47] Dale Hample,et al. The Toulmin Model and the Syllogism , 1977 .
[48] M. Bacharach. Two-person Cooperative Games , 1976 .
[49] Willard Van Orman Quine,et al. From a Logical Point of View , 1955 .
[50] Bart Verheij,et al. DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions , 2003, J. Log. Comput..
[51] Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al. Reasons: belief support and goal dynamics , 1996 .
[52] D. Medin,et al. Comments on part I: psychological essentialism , 1989 .
[53] Martha Kneale,et al. The development of logic , 1963 .
[54] Michael Clark,et al. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory , 1980 .
[55] P G rdenfors,et al. Knowledge in flux: modeling the dynamics of epistemic states , 1988 .
[56] Jaakko Hintikka,et al. The fallacy of fallacies , 1987 .
[57] James B. Freeman,et al. Relevance, warrants, backing, inductive support , 1992 .
[58] D. Walton,et al. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning , 1995 .
[59] C. Tindale. Acts of arguing : a rhetorical model of argument , 1999 .
[60] Emil L. Post. Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems , 1944 .
[61] Druin Burch. Two concepts of liberty , 2004, The Lancet.
[62] John Hayden Woods,et al. Paradox and paraconsistency - conflict resolution in the abstract sciences , 2002 .
[63] C. A. J. Coady,et al. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. , 1994 .
[64] E. Zemach. Human understanding , 1992, Synthese.
[65] Jennifer Wiley,et al. Representations of the Gulf Crisis as Derived from the U.S. Senate Debate , 1998 .
[66] Dale Jacquette,et al. Two Sides of Any Issue , 2007 .
[67] John Fox,et al. A LOGIC OF ARGUMENTATION FOR REASONING UNDER UNCERTAINTY , 1995, Comput. Intell..
[68] Jimmie D. Trent. Toulmin's model of an argument: An examination and extension , 1968 .
[69] Harvey Siegel,et al. Instrumental Rationality and Naturalized Philosophy of Science , 1996, Philosophy of Science.
[70] W. Slob,et al. How to Distinguish Good and Bad Arguments: Dialogico-Rhetorical Normativity , 2002 .
[71] M. Heesacker,et al. Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. , 1981 .
[72] Bart Verheij,et al. Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic , 2003, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[73] Henry Prakken,et al. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning , 1996, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[74] Eveline T. Feteris,et al. A Survey of 25 Years of Research on Legal Argumentation , 1997 .
[75] Stephen Toulmin,et al. The Fabric of the Heavens , 1961 .
[76] J. L. Austin,et al. The foundations of arithmetic : a logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number , 1951 .
[77] Des Gasper,et al. Analyzing Argumentation in Planning and Public Policy: Assessing, Improving, and Transcending the Toulmin Model , 1998 .
[78] D. Hitchcock,et al. Evidence Based Practice: Logic And Critical Thinking In Medicine , 2004 .
[79] L. Goble. The Blackwell guide to philosophical logic , 2001 .
[80] Henry Prakken,et al. An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning , 2002, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[81] D. Schum,et al. A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence , 1996 .
[82] David M. Godden,et al. Psychologism in the Logic of John Stuart Mill: Mill on the Subject Matter and Foundations of Ratiocinative Logic , 2005 .
[83] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al. Argument-based explanation of logic programs , 1991, Knowl. Based Syst..
[84] Stephen Toulmin,et al. Wittgenstein's Vienna , 1973 .
[85] Robert H. Ennis. Applying Soundness Standards to Qualified Reasoning , 2004 .
[86] Paul J. Krause,et al. Dialectic reasoning with inconsistent information , 1993, UAI.
[87] John Zeleznikow,et al. The Split-up Project: Induction, Context and Knowledge Discovery in Law , 2004 .
[88] Douglas Walton,et al. Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation , 1989 .
[89] Paul Bergman,et al. Trial advocacy in a nutshell , 1989 .
[90] Antonis C. Kakas,et al. Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents , 2003, AAMAS '03.
[91] Judith P. Dick,et al. Conceptual retrieval and case law , 1987, ICAIL '87.
[92] James B. Freeman,et al. Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments , 1991 .
[93] Bart Verheij,et al. Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation , 2003, Artif. Intell..
[94] T. Govier. Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation , 2018 .
[95] Ana Gabriela Maguitman,et al. Logical models of argument , 2000, CSUR.
[96] John Cantwell,et al. Resolving Conflicting Information , 1998, J. Log. Lang. Inf..
[97] James Griffin,et al. Are There Incommensurable Values , 1988 .
[98] L. Cohen,et al. Are People Programmed to Commit Fallacies? Further Thoughts about the Interpretation of Experimental Data on Probability Judgment , 1982 .
[99] John Fox,et al. Safe and sound - artificial intelligence in hazardous applications , 2000 .
[100] John Fox,et al. Arguing about beliefs and actions , 1998, Applications of Uncertainty Formalisms.
[101] Ian Mueller,et al. Philosophy of mathematics and deductive structure in Euclid's Elements , 1981 .
[102] Nicholas Rescher,et al. Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge , 1977 .
[103] Paul J. Krause,et al. Argumentation as a General Framework for Uncertain Reasoning , 1993, UAI.
[104] John Fox,et al. Arguments, Contradicitions and Practical Reasoning , 1992, ECAI.
[105] Stephen P. Norris,et al. Defining observational competence , 1984 .
[106] Antonis C. Kakas,et al. Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Robert A. Kowalski, Part I , 2002 .
[107] Dov M. Gabbay,et al. The reach of abduction : insight and trial , 2005 .
[108] Douglas Walton,et al. Is there a Burden of Questioning? , 2004, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[109] Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al. Representation and Integration of Multiple Knowledge Sources: Issues and Questions , 1997 .
[110] S. Poirier. Foundations of mathematics , 2007 .
[111] J Austoker,et al. Computer support for interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care: comparative study with simulated cases , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[112] John Zeleznikow,et al. Family_Winner: Integrating Game Theory and Heuristics to Provide Negotiation Support , 2003 .
[113] Ronald Prescott Loui,et al. Rationales and argument moves , 1995, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[114] Peter McBurney,et al. Chapter 3 DECISION SUPPORT FOR PRACTICAL REASONING A Theoretical and Computational Perspective , 2008 .
[115] George C. Christie. An Essay on Discretion , 1986 .
[116] J. Raz,et al. Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action , 2001 .
[117] Rolf George. Bolzano's consequence, relevance, and enthymemes , 1983, J. Philos. Log..
[118] Maria Simosi. Using Toulmin's Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations , 2003 .
[119] D. Shapere. The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy , 1982 .
[120] Douglas Walton. Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation , 1991 .
[121] Karl Branting,et al. An Agenda for Empirical Research in AI and Law , 2003, Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems.
[122] D. Hofstadter,et al. Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1979 .
[123] John L. Pollock,et al. Belief Revision And Epistemology , 2000, Synthese.
[124] Edwina L. Rissland,et al. Arguments and cases: An inevitable intertwining , 1992, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[125] C. Ilie. What else can I tell you?: A pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative acts , 1994 .
[126] A. F. Snoeck Henkemans,et al. Clues for reconstructing symptomatic argumentation , 2002 .
[127] Renata Wassermann. Resource Bounded Belief Revision , 1999 .
[128] Bernard Hoose,et al. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning , 1991 .
[129] David Hitchcock,et al. Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model , 2005, Arguing on the Toulmin Model.
[130] Hilary Kornblith,et al. Inductive Inference and Its Natural Ground: An Essay in Naturalistic Epistemology , 1993 .
[131] Andrew S. Coulson,et al. RAGs: A Novel Approach to Computerized Genetic Risk Assessment and Decision Support from Pedigrees , 2001, Methods of Information in Medicine.
[132] Don Fallis,et al. Intentional Gaps In Mathematical Proofs , 2004, Synthese.
[133] Luuk Matthijssen,et al. Interfacing Between Lawyers and Computers: An Architecture for Knowledge-based Interfaces to Legal Databases , 1999 .
[134] Rolf A. Eberle. Replacing One Theory by Another under Preservation of a Given Feature , 1971, Philosophy of Science.
[135] Bart Verheij. Legal decision making as dialectical theory construction with argumentation schemes , 2001, ICAIL '01.
[136] U. Eco,et al. La Ricerca della Lingua Perfetta nella Cultura Europea , 1993 .
[137] Robert C. Pinto. Truth and Premiss Adequacy , 2001 .
[138] Christopher Schroeder,et al. Knowledge and Power, Logic and Rhetoric, and Other Reflections in the Toulminian Mirror: A Critical Consideration of Stephen Toulmin's Contributions to Composition. , 1997 .
[139] S. Toulmin,et al. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Does the Distinction between Normal and Revolutionary Science Hold Water? , 1970 .
[140] Mark Weinstein,et al. Towards a Research Agenda for Informal Logic and Critical Thinking , 1990 .
[141] John L. Pollock,et al. Defeasible Reasoning , 2020, Synthese Library.
[142] Jaap Hage,et al. Dialectical models in artificial intelligence and law , 2000, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[143] Maurice A. Finocchiaro,et al. Two Empirical Approaches to the Study of Reasoning , 1994 .
[144] D. S. Clarke. Rational acceptance and purpose : an outline of a pragmatist epistemology , 1989 .
[145] Henry Prakken,et al. Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game , 2004, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[146] G. M.,et al. The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements , 1909, Nature.
[147] D. Rutherford,et al. Philosophy and language in Leibniz , 1994 .
[148] Sven Ove Hansson,et al. Acceptable premises. An epistemic approach to an informal logic problem. , 2006 .
[149] Michael E. Bratman,et al. Practical Reasoning and Acceptance in a Context , 1992 .
[150] Paul J. Krause,et al. Acceptability of arguments as 'logical uncertainty' , 1993, ECSQARU.
[151] Daniel L. Schacter,et al. The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers , 2001 .
[152] Joseph W. Wenzel. On Fields of Argument as Propositional Systems , 1982 .
[153] Gregg B. Walker,et al. Generic Argument and Argument Fields. , 1987 .
[154] Andrew Stranieri,et al. WebShell: The development of web based expert systems , 2002 .
[155] Maria Jean Johnstone Hall,et al. The Development and Rapid Evolution of the Knowledge Model of ADVOKATE: An Advisory System to Assess the Credibility of Eyewitness Testimony , 2002 .
[156] Thomas F. Gordon,et al. Pleadings game - an artificial intelligence model of procedural justice , 1995 .
[157] Robert Brandom,et al. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality , 2002 .
[158] Ralph S. Hambrick,et al. A guide for the analysis of policy arguments , 1974 .
[159] Peter Kosso,et al. Knowing the Past: Philosophical Issues of History and Archaeology , 2001 .
[160] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law , 1997, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[161] 中野 真宏,et al. "The Random House Dictionary of the English Language"に於ける新語の実例 , 1968 .
[162] John Fox,et al. REACT - A Decision-support System for Medical Planning , 2001, AMIA.
[163] R. Brandom,et al. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism , 2002 .
[164] D. Hitchcock. Toulmin’s Warrants , 2003 .
[165] F. H. Eemeren,et al. Handbook of Argumentation Theory: A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies , 1987 .
[166] G. Thomas Goodnight,et al. The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument: A Speculative Inquiry into the Art of Public Deliberation , 1982 .
[167] Andrew Aberdein,et al. Managing Informal Mathematical Knowledge: Techniques from Informal Logic , 2006, MKM.
[168] Bart Verheij. Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme , 2005 .
[169] Tim van Gelder,et al. Enhancing Deliberation Through Computer Supported Argument Visualization , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.
[170] Wayne Grennan,et al. Informal Logic: Issues and Techniques , 1997 .
[171] L. S. Lutomski,et al. The design of an attorney's statistical consultant , 1989, ICAIL '89.
[172] John Kingston,et al. Prototyping a Legal Decision Support System: A Case Study , 2002 .
[173] H. Rittel,et al. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .
[174] P. Houtlosser,et al. Indicators of a point of view , 2002 .
[175] Gerald R. Williams. Legal negotiation and settlement , 1983 .
[176] A. Lodder. DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation , 1999 .
[177] Dominic A. Clark,et al. Using predicate logic to integrate qualitative reasoning and classical decision theory , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..
[178] T. Kuhn,et al. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .
[179] R. Alexy. A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification , 1989, The Cambridge Law Journal.
[180] John E. Woods,et al. The death of argument - fallacies in agent based reasoning , 2004, Applied logic series.
[181] Henry Prakken,et al. Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations , 2003, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[182] Peter Gärdenfors,et al. On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions , 1985, Journal of Symbolic Logic.
[183] Geoffrey A. Flick. Natural justice: Principles and practical application , 1984 .
[184] William J. Ball,et al. Using Virgil to Analyze Public Policy Arguments: A System Based on Toulmin's Informal Logic , 1994 .
[185] Henry Prakken,et al. Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence , 2003, ICAIL.
[186] Charles Arthur Willard,et al. On the utility of descriptive diagrams for the analysis and criticism of arguments , 1976 .
[187] Robert H. Ennis. Identifying implicit assumptions , 1982, Synthese.
[188] Douglas Walton,et al. The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument , 1998 .
[189] Gary James Jason,et al. The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .
[190] Alan R. White,et al. Taking Rights Seriously. , 1977 .
[191] David Hitchcock,et al. 13. The Peculiarities of Stoic Propositional Logic , 2005 .
[192] Andrew Stranieri,et al. A Strategy for Evaluating Web-Based Discretionary Decision Support Systems , 2002, ADBIS Research Communications.
[193] J. F. Voss,et al. Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels , 1996 .
[194] Henry Prakken,et al. Logics for Defeasible Argumentation , 2001 .
[195] Chris Reed,et al. Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and Representation , 2004, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.
[196] Timothy A. Post,et al. Problem-Solving Skill in the Social Sciences , 1983 .
[197] Robert C. Rowland,et al. The Influence of Purpose on Fields of Argument , 1982 .
[198] H. C. Bertuccelli. What is an Argument? , 1989, APL.
[199] Gerard Vreeswijk,et al. Abstract Argumentation Systems , 1997, Artif. Intell..
[200] Concha Roldán Panadero. Theoria cum praxi: la vuelta a la complejidad (apuntes para una filosofía práctica desde el perspectivismo leibniziano) , 1997 .
[201] F. H. Eemeren,et al. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective , 1992 .
[202] J. F. Voss,et al. Learning to Reason via Instruction in Argumentation. , 1991 .
[203] Hans V. Hansen. The Straw Thing of Fallacy Theory: The Standard Definition of 'Fallacy' , 2002 .
[204] H. Laurence Ross,et al. Settled Out of Court , 1980 .
[205] J. Anthony Blair. Presumptive Reasoning/Argument: An Overlooked Class , 1999 .
[206] Andrew Stranieri,et al. Using Argumentation for the Decomposition and Classification of Tasks for Hybrid System Development , 1997, ICONIP.
[207] Wilfrid S. Sellars. Induction as Vindication , 1964 .
[208] Jaap Hage,et al. Reasoning with Rules , 1997 .
[209] ALMUTH GRÉSILLON. ZUM LINGUISTISCHEN STATUS RHETORISCHER FRAGEN , 1980 .
[210] John Woods,et al. Quantum Logic and the Unity of Science , 2004, Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science.
[211] J. Hage. Reasoning with Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic , 1996 .
[212] Robert H. Ennis. Argument appraisal strategy: A comprehensive approach , 2001 .
[213] John Zeleznikow,et al. Developing Negotiation Decision Support Systems that Support Mediators: A Case Study of the Family_Winner System , 2005, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[214] John Zeleznikow,et al. Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-Step Model , 2007 .
[215] H. Reichenbach. The rise of scientific philosophy , 1952 .
[216] Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.
[217] Manfred Kienpointner. Alltagslogik : Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern , 1992 .
[218] S. Toulmin,et al. The tyranny of principles. , 1981, The Hastings Center report.
[219] H. Prakken. Analysing reasoning about evidence with formal models of argumentation , 2004 .
[220] Robert H. Ennis. A Conception of Deductive Logic Competence , 1981 .
[221] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks , 2003, J. Log. Comput..
[222] D. Walton. A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy , 1995 .
[223] C. Tindale,et al. `Hidden' or `Missing' Premises , 1985 .
[224] Andrew Stranieri,et al. Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning , 2001, The Knowledge Engineering Review.
[225] Robert C. Pinto,et al. Reasoning: A Practical Guide for Canadian Students , 1993 .
[226] J. Wisdom. Other Minds , 1941, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures.
[227] R. Chisholm. Perceiving: A Philosophical Study , 1958 .
[228] Maurice Pagnucco,et al. The Role of Abductive Reasoning within the Process of Belief Revision , 1996 .
[229] Ralph H. Johnson. Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument , 2000 .
[230] Charles Arthur Willard. Argumentation and the social grounds of knowledge , 1982 .
[231] S. Toulmin. The Language of Morals , 1954, Philosophy.
[232] J. Searle. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts , 1979 .
[233] S. Hansson. A Survey of non-Prioritized Belief Revision , 1999 .
[234] David Zarefsky,et al. Persistent Questions in the Theory of Argument Fields , 1982 .
[235] Karl Branting,et al. A computational model of ratio decidendi , 2004, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[236] Stephen P. Norris,et al. Observation Ability: Determining and Extending Its Presence , 1984 .
[237] Alex Lascarides,et al. Indirect Speech Acts , 2001, Synthese.
[238] Jurgen Schmidt-Radefeldt. On so-called ‘rhetorical’ questions☆ , 1977 .
[239] John Zeleznikow,et al. An Australian Perspective on Research and Development Required for the Construction of Applied Legal Decision Support Systems , 2002, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[240] J. Frank. You Call That a Rhetorical Question? Forms and Functions of Rhetorical Questions in Conversation , 1990 .
[241] Walter Sinnott-Armstrong,et al. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule‐based Decision‐Making in Law and in Life , 1992 .
[242] Douglas W. Ehninger,et al. Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and application , 1960 .
[243] Aldo Franco Dragoni,et al. Distributed Belief Revision , 2004, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.
[244] Peter Clark,et al. A model of argumentation and its application in a cooperative expert system , 1991 .
[245] Stephen P. Norris,et al. The generalizability of critical thinking : multiple perspectives on an educational ideal , 1992 .
[246] M. Grace. A logical point of view , 2003, British Dental Journal.
[247] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al. Arguing about cases as practical reasoning , 2005, ICAIL '05.
[248] Jack Kaminsky. Making it Explicit , 1999 .
[249] G. I. Anzilotti. The Rhetorical Question as an Indirect Speech Device in English and Italian , 1982 .
[250] B. Burleson. On the Analysis and Criticism of Arguments: Some Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .
[251] Chris Reed,et al. On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments , 2004 .
[252] C. Peirce,et al. Philosophical Writings of Peirce , 1955 .
[253] Imran A. Zualkernan,et al. Types of Expertise: An Invariant of Problem Solving , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..
[254] Herbert A. Simon,et al. The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..
[255] Jaakko Hintikka,et al. What Was Aristotle Doing in His Early Logic, Anyway? a Reply to Woods and Hansen , 1997, Synthese.
[256] Jörg Gebhardt,et al. Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty , 1995, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[257] Donald H. Berman,et al. Indeterminacy: A challenge to logic‐based models of legal reasoning , 1987 .
[258] Leo Groarke,et al. Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics , 1999 .
[259] Phan Minh Dung,et al. On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..
[260] Andrew Stranieri,et al. The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system , 1999, ICAIL '99.
[261] Robert C. Pinto. Argument Schemes and the Evaluation of Presumptive Reasoning: some Reflections on Blair’s Account , 1999 .
[262] D. Walton,et al. Fallacies : Selected Papers 1972-1982 , 1989 .
[263] John Woods,et al. Dialectical Considerations on the Logic of Contradiction: Part I , 2005, Log. J. IGPL.
[264] Eleonore Stump,et al. Boethius's in Ciceronis Topica , 1989 .
[265] Arthur N. Kruger,et al. The Nature of Controversial Statements. , 1975 .
[266] M. Nussbaum,et al. Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. , 1992 .
[267] A. Marty. Getting to YES. Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In , 1983 .
[268] F. Paglieri,et al. Arguments as Belief Structures: Towards a Toulmin Layout of Doxastic Dynamics? , 2005 .
[269] Hans Rott,et al. Change, choice and inference - a study of belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning , 2001, Oxford logic guides.
[270] I. A. Omer. On the D-N Model of Scientific Explanation , 1970, Philosophy of Science.
[271] A. Grant,et al. Alternative dispute resolution. , 1995, The Canadian nurse.
[272] Wouter Slob,et al. The Voice of the Other: A Dialogico-Rhetorical Understanding of Opponent and of Toulmin's Rebuttal , 2006, Arguing on the Toulmin Model.
[273] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al. A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values , 2003, Artif. Intell..
[274] Charles Arthur Willard. Argument Fields and Theories of Logical Types , 1981 .
[275] F. H. Eemeren,et al. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach , 2003 .
[276] Chris Reed,et al. Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions , 2003 .
[277] Ezequiel de Olaso. ¿Cómo discutir con los escépticos? El caso de Leibniz , 1995 .
[278] Wilfrid S. Sellars. Concepts as Involving Laws and Inconceivable without Them , 1948, Philosophy of Science.
[279] Joanne Cantor,et al. Rhetorical Elicitation of Concession in Persuasion , 1974 .
[280] Ronald Prescott Loui,et al. Process and Policy: Resource‐Bounded NonDemonstrative Reasoning , 1998, Comput. Intell..
[281] M. Fuhrmann,et al. Die antike Rhetorik : eine Einführung , 2008 .
[282] R. Bush,et al. The promise of mediation : responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition , 1994 .
[283] John Woods. Epistemic Bubbles , 2005, We Will Show Them!.
[284] Robert R. O'Toole,et al. The megarians and the stoics , 2001, Greek, Indian and Arabic Logic.
[285] Dominic A. Clark,et al. Representing uncertain knowledge - an artificial intelligence approach , 1993 .
[286] Douglas R. Hofstadter,et al. Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1981 .
[287] Kat Margaret Phifer. “Euclid and His Modern Rivals” , 1879, Nature.
[288] Joel W. Robbin,et al. Mathematical logic: a first course , 1969 .
[289] Douglas Walton,et al. Plausible deniability and evasion of burden of proof , 1996 .
[290] John Zeleznikow,et al. Towards a plea bargaining decision support system for Legal Aid lawyers in Victorian lower courts , 2005 .
[291] F. C. P. Motta. The theory of communicative action , 1991 .
[292] J. Fox,et al. Evaluation of computer support for prescribing (CAPSULE) using simulated cases , 1997, BMJ.
[293] Andrew Stranieri,et al. Supporting discretionary decision-making with information technology: a case study in the criminal sentencing jurisdiction , 2005 .