Localized advantage in a global economy: The case of Bangalore

This article examines how and why firms in Bangalore, a city in southern India, have achieved success in the global software industry. We use Porter's "diamond framework" to analyze information obtained from secondary sources and interviews with engineers, managers, and top executives from software firms and officials involved in Bangalore's development. While we found some aspects of the case conform to Porter's framework, many other elements tend to diverge from the model. Thus, the article contributes to the Porter's diamond model literature by extending its application to assessing the development of successful regions in knowledge-based industries in developing economies. The discussion in the article would be of value to officials interested in creating such successful regions, as well as international business executives interested in the opportunities afforded by locating in these regions.

[1]  Frans van den Bosch,et al.  The competitive advantage of European nations: The impact of national culture — a missing element in porter's analysis? , 1992 .

[2]  R. Hodgetts.  Porter's Diamond Framework in a Mexican Context , 1993 .

[3]  Multiple Linked "Diamonds" and the International Competitiveness of Export-Dependent Industries: The New Zealand Experience , 1993 .

[4]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  Facing Constraints to Growth? Overseas Chinese Entrepreneurs and Traditional Business Practices in East Asia , 2004 .

[5]  C. Bellak,et al.  A Note on the Austrian "Diamond" , 1993 .

[6]  Joseph R. D’cruz,et al.  The "Double Diamond" Model of International Competitiveness: The Canadian Experience , 1993 .

[7]  Ravi Ramamurti,et al.  Wipro's Chairman Azim Premji on building a world-class Indian company , 2001 .

[8]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Borderless World , 1990 .

[9]  S. Sledge.  Does Porter's Diamond Hold in the Global Automotive Industry? , 2005 .

[10]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[11]  Larry O'Connell,et al.  Industry Clusters in Ireland: An Application of Porter's Model of National Competitive Advantage to Three Sectors , 2001 .

[12]  Ian Clark,et al.  A ‘Borderless World’? , 2000 .

[13]  Thomas W. Lee,et al.  Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research , 1998 .

[14]  P. Cooke.  Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy , 2001 .

[15]  John H. Dunning,et al.  Internationalizing Porter's Diamond , 1993 .

[16]  Krishna G. Palepu,et al.  Product and Labor Market Globalization & Convergence of Corporate Governance: Evidence from Infosys and the Indian Software Industry , 2001 .

[17]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Technology, International Business and Porter's "Diamond": Synthesizing a Dynamic Competitive Development Model 1 , 1993 .

[18]  J. H. Frey,et al.  How To Conduct Interviews by Telephone and In Person. The Survey Kit, Volume 4. , 1995 .

[19]  Andreas F. Grein,et al.  Economic performance over time: Does porter's diamond hold at the national level? , 1996 .

[20]  Rhonda W Jones,et al.  Diamond in the rough. , 2005, Nursing.

[21]  R. Grant.  Contemporary Strategy Analysis , 2005 .

[22]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[23]  F. Bosch,et al.  European management: An emerging competitive advantage of European nations , 1992 .

[24]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Foreign Subsidiaries and Multinational Strategic Management: An Extension and Correction of Porter's Single Diamond Framework , 1993 .

[25]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Business strategies in transition economies , 2001 .

[26]  J. Mathews.  A Silicon Valley of the East: Creating Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry , 1997 .

[27]  T. Padmore,et al.  Modelling systems of innovation:: II. A framework for industrial cluster analysis in regions , 1998 .

[28]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[29]  Srilata Zaheer,et al.  Concentration and Dispersion in Global Industries: Remote Electronic Access and the Location of Economic Activities , 2001 .

[30]  S. Zyglidopoulos,et al.  The internationalization journey of a high‐tech cluster , 2005 .

[31]  Haiyan Song,et al.  China and the multinationals—A winning combination , 1997 .

[32]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[33]  Özlem Öz.  Assessing Porter's framework for national advantage: the case of Turkey , 2002 .

[34]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[35]  A. Arora,et al.  The Indian Software Services Industry , 1999 .

[36]  F. Bosch,et al.  Government's impact on the business environment and strategic management , 1994 .

[37]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[38]  K. M. Mital,et al.  Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach , 2006 .

[39]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Porter's ‘competitive advantage of nations’: An assessment , 1991 .

[40]  Deli Yang,et al.  Competitive analysis of the software industry in China , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[41]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  ‘Old Economy’ Inputs for ‘New Economy’ Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New Silicon Valleys , 2001 .

[42]  Howard Davies,et al.  Porter’s Competitive Advantage Of Nations: Time For The Final Judgement? , 2000 .

[43]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage , 2004 .

[44]  N. O'shaughnessy.  Michael Porter’s Competitive Advantage revisited , 1996 .

[45]  Christian Zeller.  North Atlantic Innovative Relations of Swiss Pharmaceuticals and the Proximities with Regional Biotech Arenas , 2004 .

[46]  Donald J. Daly,et al.  Porter's Diamond and Exchange Rates , 1993 .

[47]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[48]  Deepak Kumar,et al.  IT Experience in India: Bridging the Digital Divide , 2004 .