Objective: The aim of this paper is to assess the accuracy of an algorithm implemented by PRAXIM™ in the SURGETICS™ navigation station for detection of the hip center. This study will assess the robustness and accuracy of the algorithm in various clinical situations such as those involving non-sphericity of the femoral head, motion of the pelvis during hip center detection, and restricted range of motion. Materials and Methods: The localization of the hip center, based on kinematics, relies on the recording of n successive positions of the femoral rigid body in the localizer reference system during a passive circumduction motion of the hip joint. Therefore, the shape of the clouds of points acquired may vary from one acquisition to the next. To allow a comprehensive study of the consequences of these variations for hip center detection, we developed a simulator to generate numerous clouds of points. Results given subsequently for each test are the values of the difference between the femoral mechanical axis computed with Cc, the computed hip center, and the same axis computed with Co, the reference hip center. Results: Test 1: Sensitivity to noise. The errors ranged from 3.33 E − 12 (SD 3.29E − 12) for a noise of 0 mm to 8.18E − 1 (SD − 7.05E − 1) for a noise of 15 mm. Test 2: Sensitivity to the shape of the acquisition motion. All trajectories gave an error < 1°. Test 3: Sensitivity to restricted range of motion. No value > 1° was found during this test. Test 4: Sensitivity to the distance between two points of the cloud. No value > 0.5° was found during this test. Test 5: Sensitivity to the number of points included in the cloud. No value > 1° was found during this test. Conclusions: The Surgetics algorithm is robust to noise, can compensate for pelvic motion, and can be used even in the case of restricted range of motion.
[1]
S. Schmerber,et al.
Accuracy evaluation of a CAS system: laboratory protocol and results with 6D localizers, and clinical experiences in otorhinolaryngology.
,
2001,
Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.
[2]
Cyril Boeri,et al.
Low reproducibility of the intra–operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement
,
2004,
Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.
[3]
Branislav Jaramaz,et al.
Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation.
,
2003,
The Journal of arthroplasty.
[4]
R. Ganz,et al.
Early osteoarthritic changes of human femoral head cartilage subsequent to femoro-acetabular impingement.
,
2003,
Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[5]
J Troccaz,et al.
Bone morphing: 3D morphological data for total knee arthroplasty.
,
2002,
Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.
[6]
B. Jaramaz,et al.
Mini-Incision Techniques and Navigation for Total Hip
,
2004
.