Using queuing theory to describe steady‐state runoff‐runon phenomena and connectivity under spatially variable conditions

[1] Runoff-runon occurs when spatially variable infiltration capacities result in runoff generated in one location potentially infiltrating downslope in an area with higher infiltration capacity. The runoff-runon process is invoked to explain field observations of runoff ratios that decline with plot length and steady-state infiltration rates that increase gradually with rainfall intensity. To illustrate the influence of spatial variability and runoff-runon on net infiltration and runoff generation, we use both (i) field rainfall simulation on soil with a high infiltration capacity and (ii) numerical rainfall-runoff-runon simulations over a spatially variable area. Numerical simulations have shown that the spatial variability of soil infiltration properties affects surface runoff generation; however, it has proven difficult to represent analytically the associated runoff-runon process. We argue that given some simplifying assumptions, the runoff-runon phenomenon can be represented by queuing theory, well known in the literature on stochastic processes. Using this approach we report simple analytic expressions derived from the queuing literature that quantify the total runoff under steady-state conditions from a spatially variable tilted 2-D plane, and the runoff produced by the area connected with the lower boundary of the plane under these conditions. These quantities are shown to be equal to the waiting time and the “sampled” busy period, respectively, of a first-in first-out queue with exponentially distributed arrivals and service times. The queuing theory model is shown to be consistent with field observations of runoff; however, the approach requires some simplifying assumptions and restrictions that may negate the benefits of the reported analytic solutions.

[1]  P. Nyman,et al.  Synergistic effects of water repellency and macropore flow on the hydraulic conductivity of a burned forest soil, south‐east Australia , 2010 .

[2]  R. Loch,et al.  Use of laboratory-scale rill and interill erodibility measurements for the prediction of hillslope-scale erosion on rehabilitated coal mine soils and overburdens , 2000 .

[3]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Soil degradative effects of slope length and tillage methods on alfisols in Western Nigeria. I. Runoff, erosion and crop response , 1997 .

[4]  R. H. Hawkins,et al.  STEADY‐STATE ANALYSIS OF INFILTRATION AND OVERLAND FLOW FOR SPATIALLY‐VARIED HILLSLOPES , 1987 .

[5]  Phaedon C. Kyriakidis,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability in the R‐5 infiltration data set: Déjà vu and rainfall‐runoff simulations , 1997 .

[6]  Bofu Yu,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE GREEN-AMPT AND A SPATIALLY VARIABLE INFILTRATION MODEL FOR NATURAL STORM EVENTS , 1999 .

[7]  A. Park,et al.  The influence of canopy traits on throughfall and stemflow in five tropical trees growing in a Panamanian plantation , 2008 .

[8]  V. Ferro,et al.  Analysis of soil loss data from plots of differing length for the Sparacia experimental area, Sicily, Italy. , 2010 .

[9]  Bofu Yu,et al.  Evaluation of eight different methods to predict hillslope runoff rates for a grazing catchment in Australia , 2002 .

[10]  David Dunkerley,et al.  Rain event properties in nature and in rainfall simulation experiments: a comparative review with recommendations for increasingly systematic study and reporting , 2008 .

[11]  G. Wilson,et al.  Infiltration, macroporosity, and mesoporosity distributions on two forested watersheds , 1988 .

[12]  Jean Poesen,et al.  Laboratory experiments on the influence of slope length on runoff, percolation and rill development , 1989 .

[13]  William G. Marchal,et al.  An Approximate Formula for Waiting Time in Single Server Queues , 1976 .

[14]  P. Milly An analytic solution of the stochastic storage problem applicable to soil water , 1993 .

[15]  K. D. Sharma Runoff behaviour of water harvesting microcatchments , 1986 .

[16]  R. Lal Effects of slope length on runoff from alfisols in Western Nigeria , 1983 .

[17]  Yuichi Onda,et al.  Dynamic runoff connectivity of overland flow on steep forested hillslopes: Scale effects and runoff transfer , 2008 .

[18]  Sلأren Asmussen,et al.  Applied Probability and Queues , 1989 .

[19]  A. Price Measurement and variability of physical properties and soil water distribution in a forest podzol , 1994 .

[20]  N. C. Van de Giesen,et al.  Scale effects of Hortonian overland flow and rainfall–runoff dynamics in a West African catena landscape , 2000 .

[21]  John Wainwright,et al.  Scale relationships in hillslope runoff and erosion , 2006 .

[22]  A. Joel,et al.  Measurement of surface water runoff from plots of two different sizes , 2002 .

[23]  J. Nicolau,et al.  Plot‐scale effects on runoff and erosion along a slope degradation gradient , 2010 .

[24]  Baoyuan Liu,et al.  Slope Length Effects on Soil Loss for Steep Slopes , 2000 .

[25]  Bofu Yu,et al.  Plot-scale rainfall-runoff characteristics and modeling at six sites in Australia and Southeast Asia , 1997 .

[26]  B. Bridge,et al.  A multi-purpose rainfall simulator for field infiltration and erosion studies , 2001 .

[27]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties , 1973 .

[28]  W. Green,et al.  Studies on Soil Phyics. , 1911, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[29]  Peter Wallbrink,et al.  Preferential Flow and Hydraulic Conductivity of Forest Soils , 1986 .

[30]  Bofu Yu,et al.  An assessment of methods for estimating runoff rates at the plot scale , 1998 .

[31]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  Role of run-on for describing field-scale infiltration and overland flow over spatially variable soils , 2004 .

[32]  Bofu Yu,et al.  Runoff and water erosion on road side-slopes: Effects of rainfall characteristics and slope length , 2009 .

[33]  Ward Whitt,et al.  APPROXIMATIONS FOR THE GI/G/m QUEUE , 1993 .

[34]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  A field‐scale infiltration model accounting for spatial heterogeneity of rainfall and soil saturated hydraulic conductivity , 2006 .

[35]  Gerard Govers,et al.  Experimental rainfall–runoff data: Reconsidering the concept of infiltration capacity , 2011 .

[36]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  Scaling from process timescales to daily time steps: A distribution function approach , 2005 .