Comparing acquisition of and preference for manual signs, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices in nine children with autism spectrum disorder

Abstract Objective: To compare how quickly children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) acquired manual signs, picture exchange, and an iPad®/iPod®-based speech-generating device (SGD) and to compare if children showed a preference for one of these options. Method: Nine children with ASD and limited communication skills received intervention to teach requesting preferred stimuli using manual signs, picture exchange, and a SGD. Intervention was evaluated in a non-concurrent multiple-baseline across participants and alternating treatments design. Results: Five children learned all three systems to criterion. Four children required fewer sessions to learn the SGD compared to manual signs and picture exchange. Eight children demonstrated a preference for the SGD. Conclusion: The results support previous studies that demonstrate children with ASD can learn manual signs, picture exchange, and an iPad®/iPod®-based SGD to request preferred stimuli. Most children showed a preference for the SGD. For some children, acquisition may be quicker when learning a preferred option.

[1]  Janice Light,et al.  Putting People First: Re-Thinking the Role of Technology in Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention , 2013, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[2]  Miriam C. Boesch,et al.  Comparative Efficacy of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) versus a Speech-Generating Device: Effects on Social-communicative Skills and Speech Development , 2013, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[3]  Janice Light,et al.  The iPad and Mobile Technology Revolution: Benefits and Challenges for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2013, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[4]  Miriam C. Boesch,et al.  Comparative efficacy of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on requesting skills , 2013 .

[5]  Donald A. Hantula,et al.  Evaluating Picture Exchange and the iPad™ as a Speech Generating Device to Teach Communication to Young Children with Autism , 2013 .

[6]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders , 2012 .

[7]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Speech-generating devices versus manual signing for children with developmental disabilities. , 2012, Research in developmental disabilities.

[8]  Margaret M. Flores,et al.  A Comparison of Communication Using the Apple iPad and a Picture-based System , 2012, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[9]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Comparing Three Augmentative and Alternative Communication Modes for Children with Developmental Disabilities , 2012 .

[10]  M. Fried-Oken,et al.  AAC and ICF: A Good Fit to Emphasize Outcomes , 2012, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[11]  Mandy Rispoli,et al.  Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: A review of the literature , 2010, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[12]  L. Watson,et al.  Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) on communication and speech for children with autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis. , 2010, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[13]  Samuel C. Sennott,et al.  Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go , 2009 .

[14]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: an overview of the literature. , 2007, Research in developmental disabilities.

[15]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative & Alternative Communication: Supporting Children & Adults With Complex Communication Needs , 2006 .

[16]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism , 2006, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[17]  Craig H. Kennedy,et al.  Single-Case Designs for Educational Research , 2004 .

[18]  Janice Light,et al.  Enhancing the Appeal of AAC Technologies for Young Children: Lessons from the Toy Manufacturers , 2004 .

[19]  Pat Mirenda,et al.  Toward Functional Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Students With Autism: Manual Signs, Graphic Symbols, and Voice Output Communication Aids. , 2003, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[20]  A. Bondy,et al.  The Picture Exchange Communication System , 2002 .

[21]  Kathryn Drager,et al.  Effects of AAC interventions on communication and language for young children with complex communication needs. , 2010, Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine.