Using nine degrees-of-freedom registration to correct for changes in voxel size in serial MRI studies.

Quantitative longitudinal brain magnetic resonance (MR) studies may be confounded by scanner-related drifts in voxel sizes. Total intracranial volume (TIV) normalisation is commonly used to correct serial cerebral volumetric measurements for these drifts. We hypothesised that automated rigid-body registration of whole brain incorporating automatic scaling correction might also correct for such fluctuations, and might be a more practical alternative. Twenty-three subjects (12 patients with Alzheimer's disease [AD] and 11 controls) had at least two serial T1-weighted volumetric brain MR scans. Ten scans from the control subjects were artificially scaled (stretched) by 1.5, 3.0, 4.6 and 6.1%. A 9-degrees-of-freedom (9dof) registration was used to register the scaled scans back onto the original scans and corresponding scaling factors compared to TIV measurements. A further nine 1-year repeat scans from the AD subjects were artificially scaled and registered (9dof) to baseline. The two correction methods were further assessed using multiple serial scans for each of the 23 subjects (resulting in 49 scan pairs). All serial scans were registered (9dof) to baseline. TIV was measured on all scans. It was found that the 9dof registration successfully recovered the artificially generated scaling changes. Scaling correction using 9dof registration did not alter the amount of brain atrophy measured over the 1-year period in the AD subjects. The 9dof volume scaling factors were very similar to the TIV ratios (repeat TIV over baseline TIV), but less variable (p < 0.001), in both artificial and 'real' scenarios. In the latter, the volume scaling factors allowed identification of two time-points in which a 3% change in voxel size had occurred. Both the 9dof brain registration and TIV correction were successfully able to correct for these fluctuations. Significant shifts in voxel size are a problem in longitudinal brain imaging studies. It is important that such changes are adjusted for: 9dof registration, which is automated and computationally inexpensive, may be superior to the more labour-intensive TIV correction for this purpose.

[1]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Accurate registration of serial 3D MR brain images and its application to visualizing change in neurodegenerative disorders. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  M N Rossor,et al.  Intracranial volume and Alzheimer disease: evidence against the cerebral reserve hypothesis. , 2000, Archives of neurology.

[3]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[4]  G J Barker,et al.  Reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging measurements of spinal cord atrophy: the role of quality assurance. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  A Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain: Theory and Rationale for Its Development The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) , 1995, NeuroImage.

[6]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Modeling brain deformations in Alzheimer disease by fluid registration of serial 3D MR images. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  A. Burns Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1991 .

[9]  P. Maruff,et al.  An optimized method for estimating intracranial volume from magnetic resonance images , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Normalization of cerebral volumes by use of intracranial volume: implications for longitudinal quantitative MR imaging. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Brain atrophy progression measured from registered serial MRI: Validation and application to alzheimer's disease , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Using serial registered brain magnetic resonance imaging to measure disease progression in Alzheimer disease: power calculations and estimates of sample size to detect treatment effects. , 2000, Archives of neurology.

[13]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Interactive algorithms for the segmentation and quantitation of 3-D MRI brain scans. , 1997, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[14]  G J Barker,et al.  Measurement of small inter-scan fluctuations in voxel dimensions in magnetic resonance images using registration. , 1998, Medical physics.

[15]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  S. Rose,et al.  MR image-based measurement of rates of change in volumes of brain structures. Part II: application to a study of Alzheimer's disease and normal aging. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  Nick C. Fox,et al.  The boundary shift integral: an accurate and robust measure of cerebral volume changes from registered repeat MRI , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Mapping the evolution of regional atrophy in Alzheimer's disease: Unbiased analysis of fluid-registered serial MRI , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (2) , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Visualisation and quantification of rates of atrophy in Alzheimer's disease , 1996, The Lancet.