Impact of Labeling, Legislation, and Accommodations on the Academic Achievement of African American Students with Learning Disabilities

During the last three decades, public schools have positively contemplated the concepts of mainstreaming, least restrictive environment and inclusion and have begun to serve more students with disabilities in K-12 general education classes (Hicks-Coolick & Kurtz, 1996). There has been a corresponding increase in the number of students with disabilities who attend colleges and universities. However, at the postsecondary level, issues of educating students with disabilities are often different than those affecting K-12 education, and the instructional climate is much more challenging. Therefore, this trend calls for a more systematic method of assessing needed accommodations for diverse learning needs. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of labeling, legislation, and accommodations on the postsecondary academic success of African-American students with learning disabilities (LD). An in-depth analysis of the academic interventions and accommodations that postsecondary students with LD received that contributed to their academic success and barriers that LD students experienced in accessing an appropriate postsecondary education were identified. The participants of the study were three African-American students who were classified as LD and attend Albany State University (ASU), a small public historically Black University (HBCU) in Southwest Georgia (SOWEGA). Participants were interviewed using a two-part survey questionnaire associated with postsecondary success. The interviews were tape recorded to ensure accuracy of description of students’ educational experiences. Further, each participant was observed in an academic setting. Interviews, observations, and field notes were coded and organized. Through questioning the data and reflecting upon the research objectives, interviews, educational records, and observations, emergent themes relevant to academic interventions and accommodations that the three postsecondary students with LD received that contributed to their academic success were obtained and interpretations discussed with participants. By revealing the academic interventions and accommodations that contributed to their academic success, as well as identifying barriers and issues that they experienced in accessing an appropriate postsecondary education, it is hoped that faculty and staff who work in institutions of higher learning will take into consideration the suggested recommendations for increasing the success of students with LD on their campus. Specifically for the participants, their stories will help other students with LD to examine their personal and professional lives. Finally, findings of this study will offer practical implications for educators to improve instruction and create equal opportunities for students with LD. INDEX WORDS: Labeling, Legislation, Accommodations, Academic achievement, Postsecondary African American students, Learning disabilities

[1]  P. Sitlington,et al.  Transition Education and Services for Adolescents with Disabilities. Third Edition. , 1999 .

[2]  Ann,et al.  Truth and method , 1994, Journal of Religion and Health.

[3]  Joan M. McGuire,et al.  Universal Design for Instruction: The Paradigm, Its Principles, and Products for Enhancing Instructional Access. , 2003 .

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[5]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty Phenomenology of Perception , 1964 .

[6]  S. Sarason Revisiting "The culture of the school and the problem of change" , 1971 .

[7]  B. Harry The Disproportionate Representation of Minority Students in Special Education: Theories and Recommendations. Project FORUM. Final Report. , 1994 .

[8]  S. Vogel A Retrospective and Prospective View of Postsecondary Education for Adults with Learning Disabilities , 1993 .

[9]  D. Hammill,et al.  On Defining Learning Disabilities: , 1990, Journal of learning disabilities.

[10]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[11]  L. Delbeke Quasi-experimentation - design and analysis issues for field settings - cook,td, campbell,dt , 1980 .

[12]  Holly B. Lane,et al.  Empowering Teachers and Students with Instructional Choices in Inclusive Settings , 1996 .

[13]  J. Sartre,et al.  Being and Nothingness , 2022 .

[14]  M. Manen Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy , 1990 .

[15]  J. Mcguire,et al.  Promoting Access, Accommodations, and Independence for College Students with Learning Disabilities , 1992, Journal of learning disabilities.

[16]  Joan M. McGuire,et al.  Postsecondary Education and Transition for Students with Learning Disabilities. Second Edition. , 2002 .

[17]  Richard N. Apling Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) , 2002 .

[18]  M West,et al.  Beyond Section 504: Satisfaction and Empowerment of Students with Disabilities in Higher Education , 1993, Exceptional children.

[19]  J. Kauffman Inclusion of All Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders? Let's Think Again. , 1995 .

[20]  P. Swank,et al.  Correlates of Postsecondary Employment Outcomes for Young Adults with Learning Disabilities , 1991, Journal of learning disabilities.

[21]  S. Jacob-Timm,et al.  Ethics and law for school psychologists , 1994 .

[22]  S. Alper,et al.  Postsecondary Education for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Literature , 2001 .

[23]  P. Sitlington,et al.  Are Adolescents with Learning Disabilities Successfully Crossing the Bridge into Adult Life? , 1990 .

[24]  Jacqueline S. Thousand,et al.  Creating a Responsive Curriculum for Inclusive Schools , 1996 .

[25]  P. Gerber,et al.  Instructional strategies for long-term success , 1994, Annals of dyslexia.

[26]  G. Orfield Schools More Separate: Consequences of a Decade of Resegregation , 2001 .

[27]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[28]  Daniel J. Losen,et al.  Racial inequity in special education , 2002 .

[29]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[30]  M. E. Skinner,et al.  Counseling the College-Bound Student with a Learning Disability. , 1992 .

[31]  R. Stodden,et al.  Current status of educational support provision to students with disabilities in postsecondary education , 2001 .

[32]  S. Shaw,et al.  Practices and Attitudes of Postsecondary LD Service Providers in North America , 1994, Journal of learning disabilities.

[33]  C. Maddux,et al.  Individualized Transition Planning for Students With Learning Disabilities , 2000 .

[34]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[35]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[36]  N. Smart The World's Religions , 1989 .

[37]  M. A. Yahaya,et al.  Nationwide Survey of Postsecondary Education Services for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1989, Exceptional children.

[38]  F. Gresham,et al.  Discrepancy Between Definitions of Learning Disabilities and School Practices , 1998, Journal of learning disabilities.

[39]  Jennifer Berktold,et al.  Students with Disabilities in Postsecondary Education: A Profile of Preparation, Participation, and Outcomes. , 1999 .

[40]  David W. Jardine,et al.  Speaking with a Boneless Tongue , 1992 .

[41]  Corrine Glesne,et al.  Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction , 1991 .

[42]  J. Derrida Writing and Difference , 1967 .

[43]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[44]  D. Sands,et al.  Students' Participation in Transition-Related Actions , 1999 .

[45]  W. Stainback,et al.  Educating All Students in the Mainstream of Regular Education , 1989 .

[46]  S. Scott A Change in Legal Status: An Overlooked Dimension in the Transition to Higher Education , 1991, Journal of learning disabilities.

[47]  W. Stainback,et al.  Controversial Issues Confronting Special Education: Divergent Perspectives , 1992 .

[48]  J. Berry,et al.  Transitioning College Bound Students with LD , 1991 .

[49]  David R. Geelan,et al.  Writing Our Lived Experience: Beyond the (Pale) Hermeneutic?. , 1998 .

[50]  J. Lerner Learning disabilities : theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies / Janet W. Lerner , 1981 .

[51]  I. Learning Disabilities: Issues on Definition , 1983 .

[52]  P. Adelman,et al.  Extrinsic and intrinsic factors in graduation and academic failure among LD college students , 1990, Annals of Dyslexia.

[53]  S L Day,et al.  Assistive Technology For Postsecondary Students With Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[54]  D. Hallahan,et al.  Exceptional Learners: Introduction to Special Education , 2011 .

[55]  M. Heidegger,et al.  Introduction to Metaphysics , 2017 .

[56]  D. Hart,et al.  Research to Practice: Postsecondary Education as a Critical Step Toward Meaningful Employment: Vocational Rehabilitation's Role , 2001 .

[57]  J. Mcguire,et al.  A Decision-Making Process for the College-Bound Student: Matching Learner, Institution, and Support Program , 1987 .

[58]  Richard E. Palmer,et al.  Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger and Gadamer , 1969 .

[59]  S. Vogel The Continuum of University Responses to Section 504 for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1993 .

[60]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[61]  N. Kober Twenty-Five Years of Educating Children with Disabilities: The Good News and the Work Ahead. , 2002 .

[62]  Henry B. Reiff,et al.  Learning Disabilities in Adulthood: Persisting Problems and Evolving Issues , 1994 .

[63]  Carl Brown,et al.  Computer Access in Higher Education for Students with Disabilities , 1989 .

[64]  S. Scott,et al.  Educating College Students With Disabilities: What Academic & Fieldwork Educators Need to Know , 1997 .

[65]  J. Steeves Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics , 1998 .

[66]  L. Delpit The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People's Children , 1988 .

[67]  J. Mcguire,et al.  An Investigation of Documentation Submitted by University Students to Verify Their Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[68]  John Sallis Radical hermeneutics: Repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project , 1989 .

[69]  F. Michael Connelly,et al.  Personal experience methods. , 1994 .

[70]  Lloyd M. Dunn,et al.  Special Education for the Mildly Retarded—Is Much of it Justifiable? , 1968, Exceptional children.

[71]  G. G. Fonosch,et al.  ATTITUDES OF SELECTED UNIVERSITY FACULTY MEMBERS TOWARD DISABLED STUDENTS. , 1979 .

[72]  Hermeneutic Phenomenology: An Approach to Understanding Families , 1995 .

[73]  Z. Zainal Case Study As a Research Method , 2007 .

[74]  Pamela Luft Addressing Minority Overrepresentation in Special Education: Cultural Barriers to Effective Collaboration. , 1995 .

[75]  G. O. Johnson,et al.  Special Education for the Mentally Handicapped—A Paradox , 1962 .

[76]  E. Edgar,et al.  The Postsecondary School Attendance and Completion Rates of High School Graduates With Learning Disabilities , 2000 .

[77]  Philippa H. Campbell,et al.  Technology For Persons with Severe Disabilities , 1987 .

[78]  Norma Jean Stodden,et al.  Secondary School Curricula Issues: Impact on Postsecondary Students with Disabilities , 2003 .

[79]  P. Ricoeur Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences , 1981 .

[80]  D. Smith Mind World: Essays in Phenomenology and Ontology , 2004 .

[81]  W. Sedlacek,et al.  Attitudes of Male and Female University Students toward Students with Different Physical Disabilities. Research Report No. 10-81. , 1981 .

[82]  Peter H. Irons Jim Crow's Children: The Broken Promise of the Brown Decision , 2002 .

[83]  Anne Meyer,et al.  Learning to Read in the Computer Age , 1999 .

[84]  J. Weinsheimer,et al.  Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics , 1994 .

[85]  Darrell Anthony Luzzo,et al.  The Career Development Needs of College Students with Learning Disabilities: In Their Own Words , 2001 .