ADAPTABILITY TO CHANGING TASK CONTEXTS: EFFECTS OF GENERAL COGNITIVE ABILITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND OPENNESS TO EXPERIENCE

We examined the extent to which cognitive ability, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience predict decision-making performance prior to and after unforeseen changes in the task context. Seventy-three undergraduates made decisions on a series of 75 problems during a 3-hour computerized simulation. Unbeknownst to participants, the rules used in determining correct decisions changed after problems 25 and 50. Effects of the individual differences on decision-making performance became significantly stronger after the changes. Only cognitive ability explained variance in prechange performance. Individuals with higher cognitive ability made better decisions. After the change, the cognitive ability effect increased and the effects of Conscientiousness and Openness became statistically significant. As expected, those with high Openness made better decisions. Unexpectedly, those with low Conscientiousness made better decisions. Subsequent analyses revealed that this surprising effect for Conscientiousness was due to the traits reflecting dependability (i.e., order, dutiful-ness, deliberation) rather than volition (i.e., competence, achievement striving, self-discipline).

[1]  Robert C. Mecham,et al.  A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ). , 1972 .

[2]  Ronald N. Taylor,et al.  Relative contribution of decision-maker attributes to decision processes , 1974 .

[3]  R. Morrison.  Career adaptivity: The effective adaptation of managers to changing role demands. , 1977 .

[4]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .

[5]  J. Hunter,et al.  Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance , 1984 .

[6]  H. Weiss,et al.  Routinized behavior in organizations , 1985 .

[7]  J. Hunter.  Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance , 1986 .

[8]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[9]  Alice N. Outerbridge,et al.  Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance , 1986 .

[10]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[11]  C. Hulin,et al.  Stability of skilled performance across time: Some generalizations and limitations on utilities. , 1987 .

[12]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  Goal Importance, Self-Focus, and the Goal-Setting Process , 1987 .

[13]  P. Ackerman.  Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. , 1987 .

[14]  R. McCrae.  Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. , 1987 .

[15]  Eugene F. Stone,et al.  Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. , 1989 .

[16]  K. Murphy.  Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time , 1989 .

[17]  L. Offermann,et al.  Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. , 1990 .

[18]  P. Costa,et al.  Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A Revision of the NEO Personality Inventory☆ , 1991 .

[19]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[20]  E. Salas,et al.  Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. , 1993 .

[21]  M. Mumford,et al.  Personality, Adaptability, and Performance: Performance on Well-Defined Problem Sovling Tasks , 1993 .

[22]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. , 1993 .

[23]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Goal setting, conditions of practice, and task performance: A resource allocation perspective. , 1994 .

[24]  Michele Morales Olea,et al.  Predicting pilot and navigator criteria : not much more than g , 1994 .

[25]  S. J. Motowidlo,et al.  Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. , 1994 .

[26]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. , 1995 .

[27]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less , 1996 .

[28]  G. Blickle.  Personality traits, learning stratigies, and performance , 1996 .

[29]  J. Hogan,et al.  Issues and non‐issues in the fidelity–bandwidth trade‐off , 1996 .

[30]  Criterion and construct validation of an assessment centre. , 1996 .

[31]  Sheri J. Broyles,et al.  Creativity and the Five-Factor Model , 1996 .

[32]  R. Sternberg.  The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success. , 1997 .

[33]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams : Much more than g , 1997 .

[35]  W. Borman,et al.  A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance , 1997 .

[36]  R. Hastie,et al.  Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments , 1997 .

[37]  Steve W. J. Kozlowski,et al.  Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategies. , 1997 .

[38]  M. Ashton.  Personality and job performance: the importance of narrow traits , 1998 .

[39]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  FIVE REASONS WHY THE “BIG FIVE” ARTICLE HAS BEEN FREQUENTLY CITED , 1998 .

[40]  Gregory J. Feist.  A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[41]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Extending the Multilevel Theory of Team Decision Making: Effects of Feedback and Experience in Hierarchical Teams , 1998 .

[42]  F. Prins,et al.  The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education , 1998 .

[43]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Accuracy decomposition and team decision making: Testing theoretical boundary conditions. , 1998 .

[44]  D. Jackson,et al.  Narrow reasoning about the use of broad personality measures for personnel selection , 1999 .

[45]  D. Jackson,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Bidirectional Relations in Personality-Job Performance Research , 1999 .

[46]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Research in the Psychological Laboratory , 1999 .