ADAPTABILITY TO CHANGING TASK CONTEXTS: EFFECTS OF GENERAL COGNITIVE ABILITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND OPENNESS TO EXPERIENCE
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Robert C. Mecham,et al. A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ). , 1972 .
[2] Ronald N. Taylor,et al. Relative contribution of decision-maker attributes to decision processes , 1974 .
[3] R. Morrison. Career adaptivity: The effective adaptation of managers to changing role demands. , 1977 .
[4] S. Kiesler,et al. Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .
[5] J. Hunter,et al. Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance , 1984 .
[6] H. Weiss,et al. Routinized behavior in organizations , 1985 .
[7] J. Hunter. Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance , 1986 .
[8] S. Zeger,et al. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .
[9] Alice N. Outerbridge,et al. Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance , 1986 .
[10] K Y Liang,et al. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.
[11] C. Hulin,et al. Stability of skilled performance across time: Some generalizations and limitations on utilities. , 1987 .
[12] J. Hollenbeck,et al. Goal Importance, Self-Focus, and the Goal-Setting Process , 1987 .
[13] P. Ackerman. Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. , 1987 .
[14] R. McCrae. Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. , 1987 .
[15] Eugene F. Stone,et al. Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. , 1989 .
[16] K. Murphy. Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time , 1989 .
[17] L. Offermann,et al. Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. , 1990 .
[18] P. Costa,et al. Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A Revision of the NEO Personality Inventory☆ , 1991 .
[19] Murray R. Barrick,et al. THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .
[20] E. Salas,et al. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. , 1993 .
[21] M. Mumford,et al. Personality, Adaptability, and Performance: Performance on Well-Defined Problem Sovling Tasks , 1993 .
[22] Murray R. Barrick,et al. Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. , 1993 .
[23] P. Ackerman,et al. Goal setting, conditions of practice, and task performance: A resource allocation perspective. , 1994 .
[24] Michele Morales Olea,et al. Predicting pilot and navigator criteria : not much more than g , 1994 .
[25] S. J. Motowidlo,et al. Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. , 1994 .
[26] Daniel R. Ilgen,et al. Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. , 1995 .
[27] M. D. Dunnette,et al. Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less , 1996 .
[28] G. Blickle. Personality traits, learning stratigies, and performance , 1996 .
[29] J. Hogan,et al. Issues and non‐issues in the fidelity–bandwidth trade‐off , 1996 .
[30] Criterion and construct validation of an assessment centre. , 1996 .
[31] Sheri J. Broyles,et al. Creativity and the Five-Factor Model , 1996 .
[32] R. Sternberg. The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success. , 1997 .
[33] Joseph J. Martocchio,et al. Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.
[34] Daniel R. Ilgen,et al. Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams : Much more than g , 1997 .
[35] W. Borman,et al. A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance , 1997 .
[36] R. Hastie,et al. Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments , 1997 .
[37] Steve W. J. Kozlowski,et al. Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategies. , 1997 .
[38] M. Ashton. Personality and job performance: the importance of narrow traits , 1998 .
[39] Murray R. Barrick,et al. FIVE REASONS WHY THE “BIG FIVE” ARTICLE HAS BEEN FREQUENTLY CITED , 1998 .
[40] Gregory J. Feist. A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[41] Daniel R. Ilgen,et al. Extending the Multilevel Theory of Team Decision Making: Effects of Feedback and Experience in Hierarchical Teams , 1998 .
[42] F. Prins,et al. The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education , 1998 .
[43] Daniel R. Ilgen,et al. Accuracy decomposition and team decision making: Testing theoretical boundary conditions. , 1998 .
[44] D. Jackson,et al. Narrow reasoning about the use of broad personality measures for personnel selection , 1999 .
[45] D. Jackson,et al. Meta-Analysis of Bidirectional Relations in Personality-Job Performance Research , 1999 .
[46] James J. Lindsay,et al. Research in the Psychological Laboratory , 1999 .