Perspectives on machine learning-augmented Reynolds-averaged and large eddy simulation models of turbulence
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Marco Davidovic,et al. Using Physics-Informed Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Networks for Subgrid Modeling in Turbulent Reactive Flows , 2019, ArXiv.
[2] G. He,et al. Subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of isotropic turbulent flows using an artificial neural network , 2019, Computers & Fluids.
[3] Yuji Hattori,et al. Searching for turbulence models by artificial neural network , 2016, 1607.01042.
[4] G. Iaccarino,et al. Sensitivity of flow evolution on turbulence structure , 2016 .
[5] Petros Koumoutsakos,et al. Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics , 2019, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics.
[6] Julia Ling,et al. Generalization of machine-learned turbulent heat flux models applied to film cooling flows , 2019, Journal of Turbomachinery.
[7] Justin Sirignano,et al. DPM: A deep learning PDE augmentation method (with application to large-eddy simulation) , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..
[8] M. Giles,et al. Algorithm Developments for Discrete Adjoint Methods , 2003 .
[9] Modeling subgrid-scale stress by deconvolutional artificial neural networks in large eddy simulation of turbulence , 2020 .
[10] T. Poinsot,et al. Training convolutional neural networks to estimate turbulent sub-grid scale reaction rates , 2018, Combustion and Flame.
[11] S. Girimaji,et al. Turbulence closure modeling with data-driven techniques: physical compatibility and consistency considerations , 2020, 2004.03031.
[12] Karthik Duraisamy,et al. Machine Learning-augmented Predictive Modeling of Turbulent Separated Flows over Airfoils , 2016, ArXiv.
[13] Karthik Duraisamy,et al. Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data , 2018, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics.
[14] K. Duraisamy,et al. Non-Markovian Closure Models for Large Eddy Simulations using the Mori-Zwanzig Formalism , 2016, 1611.03311.
[15] S. Balachandar,et al. Machine learning for physics-informed generation of dispersed multiphase flow using generative adversarial networks , 2020, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
[16] Qiqi Wang,et al. Multiple shooting shadowing for sensitivity analysis of chaotic dynamical systems , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..
[17] W. E,et al. Modeling subgrid-scale forces by spatial artificial neural networks in large eddy simulation of turbulence , 2020 .
[18] Julia Ling,et al. Machine learning strategies for systems with invariance properties , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..
[19] Gianluca Geraci,et al. Optimal estimator and artificial neural network as efficient tools for the subgrid-scale scalar flux modeling , 2014 .
[20] Roney L. Thompson,et al. A methodology to evaluate statistical errors in DNS data of plane channel flows , 2016 .
[21] Philippe R. Spalart,et al. Philosophies and fallacies in turbulence modeling , 2015 .
[22] Anand Pratap Singh,et al. New Approaches in Turbulence and Transition Modeling Using Data-driven Techniques , 2015 .
[23] Jinlong Wu,et al. Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework , 2018, Physical Review Fluids.
[24] Karthik Duraisamy,et al. Modal Analysis of Fluid Flows: Applications and Outlook , 2019, AIAA Journal.
[25] Ray W. Grout,et al. Machine Learning of Combustion LES Models from Reacting Direct Numerical Simulation , 2020 .
[26] G. Tryggvason,et al. Using statistical learning to close two-fluid multiphase flow equations for a simple bubbly system , 2015 .
[27] Christophe Eric Corre,et al. Subgrid-scale scalar flux modelling based on optimal estimation theory and machine-learning procedures , 2017 .
[28] Karthik Duraisamy,et al. Towards Integrated Field Inversion and Machine Learning With Embedded Neural Networks for RANS Modeling , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.
[29] Karthik Duraisamy,et al. A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..
[30] Prakash Vedula,et al. A priori analysis on deep learning of subgrid-scale parameterizations for Kraichnan turbulence , 2019, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
[31] F. Sarghini,et al. Neural networks based subgrid scale modeling in large eddy simulations , 2003 .
[33] R. Sandberg,et al. Large eddy simulations of wall jets with coflow for the study of turbulent Prandtl number variations and data-driven modeling , 2020, Physical Review Fluids.
[34] Jinlong Wu,et al. Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data , 2016, 1606.07987.
[35] C. L. Teo,et al. A neural net approach in analyzing photograph in PIV , 1991, Conference Proceedings 1991 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[36] R. Fox,et al. Sparse identification of multiphase turbulence closures for coupled fluid–particle flows , 2020, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[37] Richard D. Sandberg,et al. Turbulence Model Development using CFD-Driven Machine Learning , 2019 .
[38] S. Beetham,et al. Formulating turbulence closures using sparse regression with embedded form invariance , 2020 .
[39] K. Duraisamy,et al. Using field inversion to quantify functional errors in turbulence closures , 2016 .
[40] Petros Koumoutsakos,et al. Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learning , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[41] Xia Hu,et al. Techniques for interpretable machine learning , 2018, Commun. ACM.
[42] J. Templeton,et al. Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance , 2016, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[43] Qiqi Wang,et al. Sensitivity analysis on chaotic dynamical systems by Finite Difference Non-Intrusive Least Squares Shadowing (FD-NILSS) , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..
[44] Karthik Duraisamy,et al. Status, Emerging Ideas and Future Directions of Turbulence Modeling Research in Aeronautics , 2017 .
[45] Omer San,et al. A neural network approach for the blind deconvolution of turbulent flows , 2017, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[46] Julia Ling,et al. Turbulent scalar flux in inclined jets in crossflow: counter gradient transport and deep learning modelling , 2020, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[47] Michele Milano,et al. Neural network modeling for near wall turbulent flow , 2002 .
[48] Paola Cinnella,et al. Quantification of model uncertainty in RANS simulations: A review , 2018, Progress in Aerospace Sciences.
[49] P. Durbin. Some Recent Developments in Turbulence Closure Modeling , 2018 .
[50] K. Duraisamy,et al. Augmentation of turbulence models using field inversion and machine learning , 2017 .
[51] Paola Cinnella,et al. Discovery of Algebraic Reynolds-Stress Models Using Sparse Symbolic Regression , 2019 .
[52] Isabelle Guyon,et al. An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[53] Stefan P. Domino,et al. A Framework for Characterizing Structural Uncertainty in Large-Eddy Simulation Closures , 2018 .
[54] Nils Thürey,et al. tempoGAN: A Temporally Coherent, Volumetric GAN for Super-resolution Fluid Flow , 2018, ACM Trans. Graph..
[55] Todd A. Oliver,et al. Bayesian uncertainty quantification applied to RANS turbulence models , 2011 .
[56] K. Taira,et al. Super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows with machine learning , 2018, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[57] Steven L. Brunton,et al. Data-Driven Identification of Parametric Partial Differential Equations , 2018, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..
[58] Brendan D. Tracey,et al. Application of supervised learning to quantify uncertainties in turbulence and combustion modeling , 2013 .
[59] N. Adams,et al. An approximate deconvolution procedure for large-eddy simulation , 1999 .
[60] P. A. Durbin,et al. Transition modeling using data driven approaches , 2014 .
[61] Hyojin Kim,et al. Unsupervised deep learning for super-resolution reconstruction of turbulence , 2020, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[62] Jonathan R. Holland,et al. Field Inversion and Machine Learning With Embedded Neural Networks: Physics-Consistent Neural Network Training , 2019, AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum.
[63] Heng Xiao,et al. Quantifying and reducing model-form uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations: A data-driven, physics-informed Bayesian approach , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..
[64] G. Tryggvason,et al. Using statistical learning to close two-fluid multiphase flow equations for bubbly flows in vertical channels , 2016 .
[65] K. Duraisamy,et al. Informing turbulence closures with computational and experimental data , 2016 .
[66] Chao Ma,et al. Modeling subgrid-scale force and divergence of heat flux of compressible isotropic turbulence by artificial neural network , 2019, Physical Review Fluids.
[67] Richard D. Sandberg,et al. The development of algebraic stress models using a novel evolutionary algorithm , 2017 .
[68] Michael Schäfer,et al. Data-driven Augmentation of RANS Turbulence Models for Improved Prediction of Separation in Wall-bounded Flows , 2020 .
[69] Andrew Pollard,et al. Evaluation of Turbulence Models Using Direct Numerical and Large-Eddy Simulation Data , 2011 .
[70] Richard Sandberg,et al. A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress-strain relationship , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..
[71] R. Moser,et al. Optimal LES formulations for isotropic turbulence , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[72] Joseph Mathew,et al. A NEW APPROACH TO LES BASED ON EXPLICIT FILTERING , 2006, Proceeding of Fourth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.
[73] Zhixiang Xiao,et al. Improving the k–ω–γ–Ar transition model by the field inversion and machine learning framework , 2020 .
[74] Brendan D. Tracey,et al. A Machine Learning Strategy to Assist Turbulence Model Development , 2015 .
[75] Kai Fukami,et al. Machine-learning-based spatio-temporal super resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows , 2020, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[76] Jian Fang,et al. Iterative Framework of Machine-Learning Based Turbulence Modeling for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations , 2019 .
[77] Qiqi Wang,et al. Quantification of structural uncertainties in the k − ω turbulence model , 2010 .
[78] T. Lund. The use of explicit filters in large eddy simulation , 2003 .
[79] Sravya Nimmagadda,et al. Turbulence Enrichment using Generative Adversarial Networks , 2018 .