Evaluating the theoretical performance of aircraft wastewater monitoring as a tool for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance

Background Air travel plays an import role in the cross-border spread of infectious diseases. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic many countries introduced strict border testing protocols to monitor the incursion of the virus. However, the high implementation cost and significant inconvenience to passengers has led public health authorities to consider alternative methods of disease surveillance at borders. Aircraft wastewater monitoring has been proposed as one such alternative. In this paper we assess the theoretical limits of aircraft wastewater monitoring and compare its performance to post-arrival border screening approaches. Methods We use an infectious disease model to simulate an unmitigated SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in a seed country. Seeding of the epidemic into the United Kingdom (UK) is simulated through daily flights between the two countries. We use a probabilistic approach to estimate the time of first detection of the disease in the UK in both aircraft wastewater and respiratory swab screening at the border. Results For simulations across a broad range of model parameters, our analysis indicates that the median time between the first incursion of a pathogen and its detection in wastewater would be approximately 17 days (IQR: 7 - 28 days), resulting in a median of 25 cumulative cases (IQR: 6 - 84 cases) in the UK at the point of detection. Comparisons to respiratory swab screening suggest that aircraft wastewater monitoring is as effective as screening of 20% of passengers at the border, using a test with 95% sensitivity. For testing regimes with sensitivity of 85% or less, the required coverage to outperform wastewater monitoring increases to 30%. These results demonstrate the potential use cases of aircraft wastewater monitoring and its utility in a wider system of public health surveillance.

[1]  Davey L. Jones,et al.  Wastewater-based monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 at UK airports and its potential role in international public health surveillance , 2023, PLOS global public health.

[2]  S. Malham,et al.  Suitability of aircraft wastewater for pathogen detection and public health surveillance , 2022, Science of The Total Environment.

[3]  N. French,et al.  Tracing the international arrivals of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants after Aotearoa New Zealand reopened its border , 2022, Nature Communications.

[4]  B. La Scola,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Aircraft Wastewater Shows That Mandatory Tests and Vaccination Pass before Boarding Did Not Prevent Massive Importation of Omicron Variant into Europe , 2022, Viruses.

[5]  Lukas Feddern,et al.  Did border closures slow SARS-CoV-2? , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Anyu Liu,et al.  Corrigendum to “Covid-19 and the aviation industry: The interrelationship between the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic and the frequency of flights on the EU Market” [Ann. Tour. Res., Volume 91, November 2021, 103298] , 2022, Annals of Tourism Research.

[7]  W. Ahmed,et al.  Wastewater surveillance demonstrates high predictive value for COVID-19 infection on board repatriation flights to Australia , 2021, Environment International.

[8]  G. Williams,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 testing and sequencing for international arrivals reveals significant cross border transmission of high risk variants into the United Kingdom , 2021, EClinicalMedicine.

[9]  A. Zhang,et al.  COVID-19 pandemic and air transportation: Successfully navigating the paper hurricane , 2021, Journal of Air Transport Management.

[10]  O. Horstick,et al.  Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: an evidence map , 2021, BMJ Open.

[11]  Kelley Lee,et al.  Evidence of the effectiveness of travel-related measures during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid systematic review , 2020, BMJ Global Health.

[12]  K W Heaton,et al.  Defecation frequency and timing, and stool form in the general population: a prospective study. , 1992, Gut.