Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage computed tomography (CT) angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with a 64-section CT scanner using following tube voltages: 140 kVp (Protocol A), 120 kVp (Protocol B), 100 kVp (Protocol C), and 80 kVp (Protocol D). To achieve similar noise, combined z-axis and xy-axes automatic tube current modulation was applied. Effective dose (ED) for the four tube voltages was assessed. Three plastic vials filled with different concentrations of iodinated solution were placed on the phantom's abdomen to obtain attenuation measurements. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated and a figure of merit (FOM) for each iodinated solution was computed as SNR(2)/ED. RESULTS The ED was kept similar for the four different tube voltages: (A) 5.4 mSv +/- 0.3, (B) 4.1 mSv +/- 0.6, (C) 3.9 mSv +/- 0.5, and (D) 4.2 mSv +/- 0.3 (P > .05). As the tube voltage decreased from 140 to 80 kVp, image noise was maintained (range, 13.8-14.9 HU) (P > .05). SNR increased as the tube voltage decreased, with an overall gain of 119% for the 80-kVp compared to the 140-kVp protocol (P < .05). The FOM results indicated that with a reduction of the tube voltage from 140 to 120, 100, and 80 kVp, at constant SNR, ED was reduced by a factor of 2.1, 3.3, and 5.1, respectively, (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS As tube voltage decreases, automatic tube current modulation for CT angiography yields either a significant increase in image quality at constant radiation dose or a significant decrease in radiation dose at a constant image quality.

[1]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  16-MDCT aortography with a low-dose contrast material protocol. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Annet Waaijer,et al.  Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality--reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings. , 2007, Radiology.

[4]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Effect of X-ray Tube Parameters, Iodine Concentration, and Patient Size on Image Quality in Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Chest-Phantom-Study , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[5]  C. Heyer,et al.  Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: prospective randomized study. , 2007, Radiology.

[6]  Greta Toncheva,et al.  Effective Dose Determination Using an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor Technology for Clinical Adult Body Multidetector Array Computed Tomography Protocols , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  S. Schaller,et al.  Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose , 2005, European Radiology.

[8]  W Huda,et al.  Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[9]  R. Sinert,et al.  The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in trauma patients , 2006, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[10]  Bernhard Schmidt,et al.  Pediatric cardiovascular CT angiography: radiation dose reduction using automatic anatomic tube current modulation. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  J. Staessen,et al.  Progress in cardiovascular diseases: cognitive function in essential hypertension. , 2006, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[12]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[14]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[15]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Contrast agent--associated nephrotoxicity. , 2003, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[16]  K. Togashi,et al.  Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac MDCT angiography using reduced dose of contrast material. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Takeshi Nakaura,et al.  Lower tube voltage reduces contrast material and radiation doses on 16-MDCT aortography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. , 2006, Radiology.

[19]  16-MDCT angiography in living kidney donors at various tube potentials: impact on image quality and radiation dose. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Ulf Nyman,et al.  Eighty-peak kilovoltage 16-channel multidetector computed tomography and reduced contrast-medium doses tailored to body weight to diagnose pulmonary embolism in azotaemic patients , 2006, European Radiology.

[21]  D. Sahani,et al.  Using the K-edge to Improve Contrast Conspicuity and to Lower Radiation Dose With a 16-MDCT: a Phantom and Human Study , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.