The Early Growth and Development Study: A Prospective Adoption Design

Abstract The Early Growth and Development Study is a prospective adoption study of birth parents, adoptive parents, and adopted children (N = 359 triads) that was initiated in 2003. The primary study aims are to examine how family processes mediate or moderate the expression of genetic influences in order to aid in the identification of specific family processes that could serve as malleable targets for intervention. Participants in the study are recruited through adoption agencies located throughout the United States, following the birth of a child. Assessments occur at 6-month intervals until the child reaches 3 years of age. Data collection includes the following primary constructs: infant and toddler temperament, social behavior, and health; birth and adoptive parent personality characteristics, psychopathology, competence, stress, and substance use; adoptive parenting and marital relations; and prenatal exposure to drugs and maternal stress. Preliminary analyses suggest the representativeness of the sample and minimal confounding effects of current trends in adoption practices, including openness and selective placement. Future plans are described.

[1]  W. Iacono,et al.  The Environments of Adopted and Non-adopted Youth: Evidence on Range Restriction From the Sibling Interaction and Behavior Study (SIBS) , 2007, Behavior genetics.

[2]  R. Krukowski,et al.  Assessment of adult psychopathology: meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  P. McGuffin,et al.  Family Dysfunction Interacts with Genes in the Causation of Antisocial Symptoms , 2005, Behavior genetics.

[4]  D. Shaw,et al.  Codevelopment of externalizing and internalizing problems in early childhood , 2004, Development and Psychopathology.

[5]  T. B. Üstün,et al.  The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) , 2004, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[6]  C. Hazan,et al.  Adoption as a natural experiment , 2003, Development and Psychopathology.

[7]  A. Caspi,et al.  Can women provide reliable information about their children's fathers? cross-informant agreement about men's lifetime antisocial behaviour. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[8]  A. Caspi,et al.  Personality Development Across the Life Course:The Argument for Change and Continuity , 2001 .

[9]  K. Deater-Deckard,et al.  Parent-child mutuality in early childhood: two behavioral genetic studies. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[10]  K. Deater-Deckard,et al.  Parenting and child behavioral adjustment in early childhood: a quantitative genetic approach to studying family processes. , 2000, Child development.

[11]  M. Stoolmiller,et al.  Implications of the restricted range of family environments for estimates of heritability and nonshared environment in behavior-genetic adoption studies. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  M. Rutter,et al.  Genotype-environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[13]  R. Cadoret,et al.  Depression spectrum disease, I: The role of gene-environment interaction. , 1996, The American journal of psychiatry.

[14]  R. Cadoret,et al.  The developmental interface between nature and nurture: A mutual influence model of child antisocial behavior and parent behaviors. , 1996 .

[15]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[16]  R. Cadoret,et al.  Genetic-environmental interaction in the genesis of aggressivity and conduct disorders. , 1995, Archives of general psychiatry.

[17]  Phil A. Silva,et al.  Temperamental origins of child and adolescent behavior problems: from age three to age fifteen. , 1995, Child development.

[18]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[19]  A. Beck,et al.  Depression versus anxiety: a test of the content-specificity hypothesis. , 1989, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[20]  A. Beck,et al.  An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[21]  R. Plomin,et al.  Consistency and change in mothers' behavior toward young siblings. , 1986, Child development.

[22]  R. Cadoret,et al.  Evidence for gene-environment interaction in the development of adolescent antisocial behavior , 1983, Behavior genetics.

[23]  R. Cadoret.  Genotype–environment interaction in antisocial behaviour , 1982, Psychological Medicine.

[24]  R. Cadoret,et al.  Genetic and environmental factors in adoptee antisocial personality , 2005, European archives of psychiatry and neurological sciences.

[25]  M. Reiser,et al.  Longitudinal relations among parental emotional expressivity, children's regulation, and quality of socioemotional functioning. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[26]  J. J. Ryan,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III , 2001 .

[27]  D. Reiss,et al.  The relationship code: Deciphering genetic and social patterns in adolescent development , 2000 .

[28]  R. Plomin,et al.  Nature and Nurture During Middle Childhood , 1994 .

[29]  A. Beck,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation , 1988 .

[30]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  R. Plomin,et al.  Origins of individual differences in infancy : the Colorado Adoption Project , 1985 .