Comparison in net solar efficiency between the use of concentrating and non-concentrating solar collectors in solar aided power generation systems

Abstract Solar Aided Power Generation (SAPG) technology offers the promise of a higher energy efficacy and lower carbon emissions. In virtually all pilot-scale SAPG projects, concentrating solar collectors (e.g. parabolic trough collectors) are used to produce solar heat with a temperature ranging from 300 °C to 350 °C, to replace the feed water pre-heating in high pressure feed-heaters (HPH) in regenerative Rankine steam cycles. Although concentrating solar collectors offer a higher solar thermal efficiency, whether the use of this type of solar collector in a SAPG system can still offer both higher net solar thermal and net solar to power efficiencies remains unknown. This paper investigates the performance of an SAPG with either concentrating collectors or non-collectors (evacuated tube collectors). It was found that non-concentrating collectors are able to generate more power through the SAPG mechanism and exhibit higher net solar efficiencies than concentrating collectors on the per unit land area basis. This outcome suggests that the use of non-concentrating collectors in SAPG systems is more efficient than the use of concentrating collectors.

[1]  A. Kouzani,et al.  Multi-point and multi-level solar integration into a conventional coal-fired power plant , 2010 .

[2]  S. C. Kaushik,et al.  Exergetic utilization of solar energy for feed water preheating in a conventional thermal power plant , 2009 .

[3]  You Ying,et al.  Thermodynamic advantages of using solar energy in the regenerative Rankine power plant , 1999 .

[4]  D. Kearney,et al.  Test results: SEGS LS-2 solar collector , 1994 .

[5]  Yang Yongping,et al.  Performance evaluation of solar aided feedwater heating of coal-fired power generation (SAFHCPG) system under different operating conditions , 2013 .

[6]  Yongping Yang,et al.  Solar thermal aided power generation , 2010 .

[7]  Graham L. Morrison,et al.  Performance of a Water-in-Glass Evacuated Tube Solar Water Heater , 2001 .

[8]  A. Patnode Simulation and Performance Evaluation of Parabolic Trough Solar Power Plants , 2006 .

[9]  Gregory J. Kolb Economic evaluation of solar-only and hybrid power towers using molten salt technology , 1996 .

[10]  T. Stuetzle,et al.  Automatic control of a 30 MWe SEGS VI parabolic trough plant , 2004 .

[11]  Mohan Kolhe,et al.  An experimental platform for heat pipe solar collector testing , 2013 .

[12]  Eric Hu,et al.  An Efficient Method to Generate Power from Low to Medium Temperature Solar and Geothermal Resources , 2010 .

[13]  Yongping Yang,et al.  An efficient way to use medium-or-low temperature solar heat for power generation – integration into conventional power plant , 2011 .

[14]  Yongping Yang,et al.  Evaluation of solar aided thermal power generation with various power plants , 2011 .

[15]  P. G. Vidal,et al.  Characterization of the insulation and leakage currents of PV generators: Relevance for human safety , 2010 .

[16]  R. Bird,et al.  Simplified clear sky model for direct and diffuse insolation on horizontal surfaces , 1981 .

[17]  R. J. Zoschak,et al.  Studies of the direct input of solar energy to a fossil-fueled central station steam power plant , 1975 .

[18]  C. Mota,et al.  Glycerin Derivatives as Fuel Additives: The Addition of Glycerol/Acetone Ketal (Solketal) in Gasolines , 2010 .