Influence of stream geomorphic condition on fish communities in Vermont, U.S.A.

SUMMARY 1. Evaluations of stream geomorphic condition may increase our understanding of the composite effects of human-induced habitat change on fish communities. Using systematic sampling of 44 reaches spread across 26 rivers in Vermont from 2002 through 2004, we tested the hypothesis that stream reaches in reference geomorphic condition would support fish assemblages that differed in diversity and productivity from fish communities found in reaches of poorer geomorphic condition. 2. At each study reach, we sampled the fish community, identified the morphological unit according to common stream classification systems and then evaluated the extent of deviation from reference geomorphic condition using a regionally adapted geomorphic assessment methodology. 3. We used principal component analysis (PCA) and linear regression to build exploratory models linking stream geomorphic condition to fish community characteristics. 4. Our results suggest that geomorphic condition significantly influences fish community diversity, productivity and condition. Geomorphic condition was a significant factor in all of our fish community models. In conjunction with additional reach characteristics, geomorphic condition explained up to 31% of the total variance observed in models for species diversity of fish communities, 44% of the variance in assemblage biomass and 45% of the variance in a regional index of biotic integrity. 5. Our work builds on single-species evidence that geomorphic characteristics represent important local-scale fish-habitat variables, showing that stream geomorphic condition is a dominant factor affecting entire fish communities. Our results enhance our understanding of the hierarchy of factors that influences fish community diversity and organisation and support the use of geomorphic condition assessments in stream management.

[1]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins , 1997 .

[2]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Linking River Channel Form and Process: Time, Space and Causality Revisited , 1997 .

[3]  A. C. Rencher Methods of multivariate analysis , 1995 .

[4]  P. Hodson,et al.  A Tier-Testing Strategy for Managing Programs of Environmental Effects Monitoring , 1996 .

[5]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Lakes and rivers as islands: species-area relationships in the fish faunas of Ontario , 1986, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[6]  L. Fahrig How much habitat is enough , 2001 .

[7]  S. Johnson,et al.  Comparison of Three Techniques to Estimate Juvenile Coho Salmon Populations in Small Streams , 1992 .

[8]  D. Montgomery PROCESS DOMAINS AND THE RIVER CONTINUUM 1 , 1999 .

[9]  Russell G. Death,et al.  Predictive modelling of freshwater fish as a biomonitoring tool in New Zealand , 2002 .

[10]  J. Deacon,et al.  Effects of water quality and habitat on composition of fish communities in the Upper Colorado River Basin , 1997 .

[11]  M. Fukushima SALMONID HABITAT–GEOMORPHOLOGY RELATIONSHIPS IN LOW-GRADIENT STREAMS , 2001 .

[12]  W. Hession,et al.  Understanding Stream Geomorphic State in Relation to Ecological Integrity: Evidence Using Habitat Assessments and Macroinvertebrates , 2004, Environmental management.

[13]  K. Fausch,et al.  Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones , 2005 .

[14]  Paul V. Bolstad,et al.  Effects of Riparian Forest Removal on Fish Assemblages in Southern Appalachian Streams , 1999 .

[15]  K. Fausch,et al.  Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes , 2002 .

[16]  David P. Larsen,et al.  Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potentials , 1986 .

[17]  R. Norris,et al.  What is river health , 1999 .

[18]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[19]  Y. Kawaguchi,et al.  Contribution of terrestrial invertebrates to the annual resource budget for salmonids in forest and grassland reaches of a headwater stream , 2001 .

[20]  Thomas F. Waters,et al.  Sediment in streams: Sources, biological effects, and control , 1995 .

[21]  Y. Kawaguchi,et al.  TERRESTRIAL INVERTEBRATE INPUTS DETERMINE THE LOCAL ABUNDANCE OF STREAM FISHES IN A FORESTED STREAM , 2003 .

[22]  James R. Karr,et al.  Biological Integrity versus Biological Diversity as Policy DirectivesProtecting biotic resources , 1994 .

[23]  M. Wolman A method of sampling coarse river‐bed material , 1954 .

[24]  S. Schumm The Fluvial System , 1977 .

[25]  Patricia A. Flebbe,et al.  Trout Use of Woody Debris and Habitat in Appalachian Wilderness Streams of North Carolina , 1995 .

[26]  D. Barton,et al.  Associations between stream fish and benthos across environmental gradients in southern Ontario, Canada , 1999 .

[27]  E. W. Lane The Importance of Fluvial Morphology in Hydraulic Engineering , 1955 .

[28]  Edward P. Gardiner,et al.  Effects of land cover on sediment regime and fish assemblage structure in four southern Appalachian streams , 2002 .

[29]  K. Fausch,et al.  Large Woody Debris and Salmonid Habitat in a Small Coastal British Columbia Stream , 1992 .

[30]  James R. Karr,et al.  Regional Applications of an Index of Biotic Integrity for Use in Water Resource Management , 1988 .

[31]  M. Collares-Pereira,et al.  Gradients in stream fish assemblages across a Mediterranean landscape: contributions of environmental factors and spatial structure , 2002 .

[32]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Species-Area Relationship for Stream Fishes , 1989 .

[33]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[34]  N. Lamouroux,et al.  INTERCONTINENTAL CONVERGENCE OF STREAM FISH COMMUNITY TRAITS ALONG GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC GRADIENTS , 2002 .

[35]  J. Newbold,et al.  Riparian deforestation, stream narrowing, and loss of stream ecosystem services. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  C. Baxter,et al.  Geomorphology, hyporheic exchange, and selection of spawning habitat by bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) , 2000 .

[37]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  Influence of Drainage Connectivity, Drainage Area and Regional Species Richness on Fishes of the Interior Highlands in Arkansas , 1998 .

[38]  G. Wilde,et al.  Seasonal and spatial variation in a prairie stream-fish assemblage , 2002 .

[39]  J. Karr Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities , 1981 .

[40]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors , 2001 .

[41]  J. Magnuson,et al.  The Importance of Ecoregion Versus Drainage Area on Fish Distributions in the St. Croix River and its Wisconsin Tributaries , 1999, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[42]  Daniel R. Miller,et al.  The Network Dynamics Hypothesis: How Channel Networks Structure Riverine Habitats , 2004 .

[43]  P. Bayley,et al.  The effect of habitat in biasing fish abundance and species richness estimates when using various sampling methods in streams , 1993 .

[44]  M. Hutchison Spatial variation in composition and richness of fish communities in a southwestern Australian river system , 1993, Ecological Research.

[45]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Pool Spacing in Forest Channels , 1995 .

[46]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Measuring Nutrient Spiralling in Streams , 1981 .

[47]  Rob J. Reash Physiochemical Factors Affecting the Abundance and Species Richness of Fishes in the Cimarron River , 1990 .

[48]  G. Likens,et al.  Linkages between Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems , 1974 .

[49]  James R. Karr,et al.  Habitat Structure and Stream Fish Communities , 1978 .

[50]  M. Power,et al.  HOW FINE SEDIMENT IN RIVERBEDS IMPAIRS GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF JUVENILE SALMONIDS , 2004 .

[51]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications , 1953 .

[52]  Kenneth G. Gerow,et al.  Effort Needed to Estimate Species Richness in Small Streams on the Great Plains in Wyoming , 2000 .

[53]  S. L. Lewis Physical Factors Influencing Fish Populations in Pools of a Trout Stream , 1969 .

[54]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  Influence of Physico-chemical Factors on Habitat Selection by Red Shiners, Notropis lutrensis (Pisces: Cyprinidae) , 1979 .

[55]  Gary Brierley,et al.  Post-European changes to the fluvial geomorphology of Bega catchment, Australia: implications for river ecology , 1999 .

[56]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  Patterns in Freshwater Fish Ecology , 1998, Springer US.

[57]  Calvin Zippin,et al.  The Removal Method of Population Estimation , 1958 .

[58]  Dennis L. Scarnecchia,et al.  Habitat use and population structure of four native minnows (family Cyprinidae) in the upper Missouri and lower Yellowstone rivers, North Dakota (USA) , 2004 .

[59]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance , 1999 .

[60]  M. Freeman,et al.  Geomorphology and fish assemblages in a Piedmont river basin, U.S.A , 2003 .

[61]  O. Soderstrom,et al.  Upstream movements of invertebrates in running waters: a review , 1987 .

[62]  T. Reynoldson,et al.  The Reference Condition: A Comparison of Multimetric and Multivariate Approaches to Assess Water-Quality Impairment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[63]  B. Mcintosh,et al.  Historical changes in pool habitats in the Columbia River basin , 2000 .

[64]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Re‐establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[65]  K. Tockner,et al.  Physico-chemical heterogeneity in a glacial riverscape , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[66]  D. Rosgen A classification of natural rivers , 1994 .

[67]  G. W. Snedecor STATISTICAL METHODS , 1967 .

[68]  Richard H. Norris,et al.  Prediction and assessment of local stream habitat features using large‐scale catchment characteristics , 2000 .

[69]  J. Allan,et al.  Catchment-scale analysis of aquatic ecosystems , 1997 .

[70]  Hilary E. Berkman,et al.  Effect of siltation on stream fish communities , 1987, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[71]  D. Rosgen Applied River Morphology , 1996 .