The Challenge of Follow-Up in a Low-Income Colposcopy Clinic: Characteristics Associated With Noncompliance in High-Risk Populations
暂无分享,去创建一个
K. Osann | L. Wenzel | D. Chase | K. Tewari | Nicole Sepina
[1] M. Mareel,et al. Opioids affect focal contact-mediated cell–substrate adhesion , 2010, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.
[2] Á. D. de Miguel,et al. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Spain and predictors of adherence , 2010, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.
[3] H. Bernard,et al. Recombination of human papillomavirus‐16 and host DNA in exfoliated cervical cells: A pilot study of L1 gene methylation and chromosomal integration as biomarkers of carcinogenic progression , 2010, Journal of medical virology.
[4] A. Kessel,et al. Cervical screening: Perceptions and barriers to uptake among Somali women in Camden. , 2009, Public health.
[5] B. Spring,et al. Predicting the stages of adoption of cervical cancer screening among Korean women. , 2009, Preventive medicine.
[6] P. Disaia,et al. Colposcopy to evaluate abnormal cervical cytology in 2008. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[7] A. Giuliano,et al. Incidence trends of invasive cervical cancer in the United States by combined race and ethnicity , 2009, Cancer Causes & Control.
[8] S. Wacholder,et al. Grading the severity of cervical neoplasia based on combined histopathology, cytopathology, and HPV genotype distribution among 1,700 women referred to colposcopy in Oklahoma , 2009, International journal of cancer.
[9] E. Lara-Torre,et al. Follow-up compliance of adolescents with cervical dysplasia in an inner-city population. , 2008, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.
[10] L. Clegg,et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study , 2008, Cancer Causes & Control.
[11] M. Steben,et al. Human papillomavirus infection: epidemiology and pathophysiology. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.
[12] F. Meier,et al. Frequency and outcome of cervical cancer prevention failures in the United States. , 2007, American journal of clinical pathology.
[13] Diane Solomon,et al. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[14] T. Wright,et al. 2006 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women With Abnormal Cervical Screening Tests , 2007, Journal of lower genital tract disease.
[15] Diane Solomon,et al. 2006 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Adenocarcinoma In Situ , 2007, Journal of lower genital tract disease.
[16] R. Kahn,et al. Sociodemographic Factors Associated With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[17] Jennifer S. Smith,et al. Factors underlying disparities in cervical cancer incidence, screening, and treatment in the United States. , 2007, Current problems in cancer.
[18] R. Pretorius,et al. Subsequent Risk and Presentation of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 3 or Cancer after a Colposcopic Diagnosis of CIN 1 or Less , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[19] Ramon M. Cestero. Risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) or cancer during follow-up of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection or CIN 1. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[20] S. Garland,et al. A study of women's knowledge regarding human papillomavirus infection, cervical cancer and human papillomavirus vaccines , 2006, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.
[21] M Arbyn,et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2006, The Lancet.
[22] M. Manos,et al. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[23] S. Newmann,et al. Social inequities along the cervical cancer continuum: a structured review , 2005, Cancer Causes & Control.
[24] K. Behbakht,et al. Social and Cultural Barriers to Papanicolaou Test Screening in an Urban Population , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[25] S. Lebaron,et al. Attitudes Toward Cervical Cancer Screening Among Muslim Women: A Pilot Study , 2004, Women & health.
[26] Ahmedin Jemal,et al. Cancer Disparities by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status , 2004, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[27] A. El-Shalakany,et al. Direct Visual Inspection of the Cervix for the Detection of Premalignant Lesions , 2004, Journal of lower genital tract disease.
[28] N. Khanna,et al. Adherence to care plan in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a review of barriers and interventions. , 2001, The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice.
[29] Hagerstoten. American society for colposcopy and cervical pathology. , 1999, Journal of lower genital tract disease.
[30] L. Massad,et al. Knowledge of cervical cancer screening among women attending urban colposcopy clinics. , 1997, Cancer detection and prevention.
[31] L. Brinton,et al. The epidemiology of cervical carcinogenesis , 1995, Cancer.
[32] R. Hiatt,et al. Misconceptions about cancer among Latinos and Anglos. , 1992, JAMA.
[33] A. Zauber,et al. Determinants of late stage diagnosis of breast and cervical cancer: the impact of age, race, social class, and hospital type. , 1991, American journal of public health.
[34] G. Matanoski,et al. Inner-city women at risk for cervical cancer: behavioral and utilization factors related to inadequate screening. , 1990, Preventive medicine.