The relationship between the number of editorial board members and the scientific output of universities in the chemistry field

Editorial board members, who are considered the gatekeepers of scientific journals, play an important role in academia, and may directly or indirectly affect the scientific output of a university. In this article, we used the quantile regression method among a sample of 1,387 university in chemistry to characterize the correlation between the number of editorial board members and the scientific output of their universities. Furthermore, we used time-series data and the Granger causality test to explore the causal relationship between the number of editorial board members and the number of articles of some top universities. Our results suggest that the number of editorial board members is positively and significantly related to the scientific output (as measured by the number of articles, total number of citations, citations per paper, and h index) of their universities. However, the Granger causality test results suggest that the causal relationship between the number of editorial board members and the number of articles of some top universities is not obvious. Combining these findings with the results of qualitative interviews with editorial board members, we discuss the causal relationship between the number of editorial board members and the scientific output of their universities.

[1]  T. Burgess,et al.  Editorial Board Membership of Management and Business Journals: A Social Network Analysis Study of the Financial Times 40 , 2010 .

[2]  Jean D. Gibbons,et al.  Rankings of Economics Faculties and Representation on Editorial Boards of Top Journals , 1991 .

[3]  J. T. Pardeck,et al.  Are Social Work Journal Editorial Boards Competent? Some Disquieting Data With Implications for Research on Social Work Practice , 1992 .

[4]  Tove Faber Frandsen,et al.  Praise the bridge that carries you over: Testing the flattery citation hypothesis , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Tindaro Cicero,et al.  A sensitivity analysis of researchers' productivity rankings to the time of citation observation , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[6]  W. Glänzel.  Seven Myths in Bibliometrics About facts and fiction in quantitative science studies , 2008 .

[7]  Cecelia M. Brown.  The role of Web-based information in the scholarly communication of chemists: Citation and content analyses of American Chemical Society Journals , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  F. Urbancic.  Faculty Representation on the Editorial Boards of Leading Marketing Journals: An Update of Marketing Department Rankings , 2005 .

[9]  Marshall H. Medoff,et al.  Editorial Favoritism in Economics , 2003 .

[10]  Joseph Engelberg,et al.  Networks and Productivity: Causal Evidence from Editor Rotations , 2012 .

[11]  Begoña Granadino,et al.  The representation of nationalities on the editorial boards of international journals and the promotion of the scientific output of the same countries , 2010, Scientometrics.

[12]  David N. Laband,et al.  Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  C. Granger.  Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[14]  Jian Wang,et al.  Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation , 2013, Scientometrics.

[15]  Lana Bosnjak,et al.  Analysis of a number and type of publications that editors publish in their own journals: case study of scholarly journals in Croatia , 2010, Scientometrics.

[16]  Hung-Gay Fung,et al.  Membership of editorial boards and rankings of schools with international business orientation , 2005 .

[17]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Citation gamesmanship: testing for evidence of ego bias in peer review , 2012, Scientometrics.

[18]  Kam C. Chan,et al.  Membership On Editorial Boards And Finance Department Rankings , 2003 .

[19]  Sara L. Rynes,et al.  “Getting on Board” with AMJ: Balancing Quality and Innovation in the Review Process , 2006 .

[20]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Gatekeeping indicators exemplified by the main players in the international gatekeeping orchestration of analytical chemistry journals , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Rangan Gupta,et al.  Time-varying causality between research output and economic growth in US , 2014, Scientometrics.

[22]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Editorial gatekeeping patterns in international science journals. A new science indicator , 2005, Scientometrics.

[23]  Tindaro Cicero,et al.  A sensitivity analysis of research institutions' productivity rankings to the time of citation observation , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[24]  P. Bakker,et al.  Editors of medical journals: Who and from where , 2005, Scientometrics.

[25]  P. Willett.  The Characteristics of Journal Editorial Boards in Library and Information Science , 2013 .

[26]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Journal gatekeepers indicator-based top universities of the world, of Europe and of 29 countries — A pilot study , 2007, Scientometrics.

[27]  G. Kaufman,et al.  Rankings of Finance Departments by Faculty Representation on Editorial Boards of Professional Journals: A Note , 1984 .

[28]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[29]  M. Valle,et al.  The etiology of top‐tier publications in management: A status attainment perspective on academic career success , 2011 .

[30]  Ling-Chu Lee,et al.  Research output and economic productivity: a Granger causality test , 2011, Scientometrics.

[31]  J. T. Pardeck,et al.  Scholarly Achievements of the Social Work Editorial Board and Consulting Editors: A Commentary , 1999 .

[32]  B. Martin,et al.  Assessing Basic Research : Some Partial Indicators of Scientific Progress in Radio Astronomy : Research Policy , 1987 .