From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: The choice of a relevant benchmark

Abstract This article deals with efficiency improvement and how to identify appropriate benchmarks for inefficient firms to imitate. We argue that the most relevant benchmark is the most similar efficient firm. Having interpreted similarity in terms of input endowments, the problem reduces to find the closest reference firm on the efficient subset of the isoquant. To such an end, we introduce the concept of input-specific contractions. This concept allows to find the shortest path to the efficient subset. This information can be used to advise inefficient firms about which efficient firm to visit in order to detect its mistakes and to learn better managerial practices.

[1]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[2]  Diana L. Day,et al.  Strategic leaders or strategic groups: A longitudinal data envelopment analysis of the U.S. brewing industry , 1995 .

[3]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models , 1998, Oper. Res. Lett..

[4]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[5]  R. Kopp The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: A Reconsideration , 1981 .

[6]  Peter Secretan Learning , 1965, Mental Health.

[7]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Projections Onto Efficient Frontiers: Theoretical and Computational Extensions to DEA , 1999 .

[8]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Production Efficiency , 1957 .

[9]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[10]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  Incentive efficient production frontiers: an agency perspective on DEA , 1994 .

[11]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Measures of technical efficiency , 1985 .

[12]  Hurvey Leibenstein Allocative efficiency vs. X-Efficiency , 1966 .

[13]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Efficiency and the production function , 1975 .

[14]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[15]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[16]  Jens Leth Hougaard,et al.  Efficiency Evaluations Based on Potential (Non-Proportional) Improvements , 1999 .

[17]  K. Zieschang An extended farrell technical efficiency measure , 1984 .

[18]  O. H. Brownlee,et al.  ACTIVITY ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION AND ALLOCATION , 1952 .

[19]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Radial and nonradial static efficiency decompositions: A focus on congestion measurement , 1998 .