Global plasticity in adult visual cortex following reversal of visual input

THE reversal or displacement of the retinal image by prism spectacles leads to extreme disruption of visually guided behaviour, but after an extended period of visual transformation normal behaviour is gradually restored. It is unclear whether this adaptation involves a change in visual perception1–5, the learning of new motor responses6, a modification of the sensori-motor control system7 or a proprioceptive change in the perceived positions of the body parts8. Here I describe the effects of visual field reversal on neuronal activity in the monkey visual cortex. After a few months of wearing reversing spectacles, some cells in the primary visual cortex began to respond to stimuli presented not only in the contralateral visual field but also in the ipsilateral field. These cells were not selective for orientation or direction of motion, but responded well to a light flash. This result suggests that adaptation to visual field reversal is mediated, at least in part, by a large-scale functional reorganization at an early stage in the visual processing pathway.

[1]  Robert B. Ammons,et al.  Motor Skills , 1951 .

[2]  James G. Taylor The behavioral basis of perception , 1962 .

[3]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co‐ordinates and optics , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  R. Held,et al.  PLASTICITY IN HUMAN SENSORIMOTOR CONTROL. , 1963, Science.

[5]  C. S. Harris Adaptation to Displaced Vision: Visual, Motor, or Proprioceptive Change? , 1963, Science.

[6]  R H Day,et al.  Sensory adaptation and behavioral compensation with spatially transformed vision and hearing. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  S Shimojo,et al.  Adaptation to the Reversal of Binocular Depth Cues: Effects of Wearing Left-Right Reversing Spectacles on Stereoscopic Depth Perception , 1981, Perception.

[8]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  W. B. Spatz,et al.  Area 17 of anthropoid primates does participate in visual callosal connections , 1984, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  J. Kaas,et al.  Interhemispheric connections of visual cortex of owl monkeys (Aotus trivirgatus), marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), and galagos (Galago crassicaudatus) , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  M. Lévesque Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[12]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Occlusion‐related cue used for analysis of motion in the primate visual cortex , 1991, Neuroreport.

[13]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex , 1992, Nature.

[14]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of object motion in the ventral part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque visual cortex. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Y. Sugita Visual Evoked Potentials of Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Vision , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.