The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion

[1]  T. Govier.  Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation , 2018 .

[2]  G. Kutrovátz.  Chapter 12. Expert authority and ad verecundiam arguments , 2012 .

[3]  David Hitchcock,et al.  The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemes , 2011 .

[4]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation , 2010 .

[5]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion , 2006 .

[6]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach , 2003 .

[7]  J. Goodwin.  Forms of Authority and the Real Ad Verecundiam , 1998 .

[8]  Ronald E. Leenes,et al.  Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority , 1997 .

[9]  J. Wagemans.  Argument schemes, topoi, and laws of logic , 2011 .

[10]  R. Pilgram.  A doctor’s argumentation by authority as a strategic manoeuvre , 2011 .

[11]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics: , 2011 .

[12]  Charlie Huenemann.  Why not to trust other philosophers , 2004 .

[13]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Fallacies as derailments of strategic maneuvering: The argumentum ad verecundiam, a case in point , 2003 .

[14]  Van Eemeren.  Crucial concepts in argumentation theory , 2001 .

[15]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective , 1992 .

[16]  J. Locke.  An Essay concerning Human Understanding , 1924, Nature.