A Coupled Meshfree/Finite Element Method for Automotive Crashworthiness Simulations

Mesh distortion induced numerical instability is a major roadblock in automotive crashworthiness finite element simulations. Remedies such as wrapping elements with null shells and deletion of distorted meshes have been adopted but none of them seems robust enough to survive various scenarios. Meshfree methods have been developed over the past almost twenty years in view of their capabilities in dealing with large material deformation and separation, but have remained in academic research due to their unaffordable high computational cost in solving large-scale industrial applications. This paper presents a coupled meshfree/finite-element method which allows engineers to model the severe deformation area with the meshfree method while keeping the remaining area modeled by the finite element methods. The method is implemented into LS-DYNA version 971 and its later versions so that it is available for automotive crashworthiness simulations. In the paper, one linear patch test and three crash examples are presented to demonstrate the accuracy of the meshfree formulation, its effectiveness in resolving mesh distortion difficulty, and the efficiency of the coupled meshfree/finite element solver in handling large-scale models.

[1]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A coupled finite element-element-free Galerkin method , 1995 .

[2]  Oden,et al.  An h-p adaptive method using clouds , 1996 .

[3]  Robert R. Mayer,et al.  Characterization of Aluminum Honeycomb Material Failure in Large Deformation Compression, Shear, and Tearing , 2002 .

[4]  Mark A Fleming,et al.  ENRICHED ELEMENT-FREE GALERKIN METHODS FOR CRACK TIP FIELDS , 1997 .

[5]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  A comparison of two formulations to blend finite elements and mesh-free methods , 2004 .

[6]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  EFG approximation with discontinuous derivatives , 1998 .

[7]  Michael A. Puso,et al.  Meshfree and finite element nodal integration methods , 2008 .

[8]  Gregory J. Wagner,et al.  Application of essential boundary conditions in mesh-free methods: a corrected collocation method , 2000 .

[9]  Gui-Rong Liu,et al.  Mesh Free Methods for Engineering Problems , 2002 .

[10]  L. Libersky,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Some recent improvements and applications , 1996 .

[11]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Stable particle methods based on Lagrangian kernels , 2004 .

[12]  Jiun-Shyan Chen,et al.  Non‐linear version of stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin mesh‐free methods , 2002 .

[13]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  Coupling of mesh‐free methods with finite elements: basic concepts and test results , 2006 .

[14]  Antonio Huerta,et al.  Enrichment and coupling of the finite element and meshless methods , 2000 .

[15]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Reproducing Kernel Particle Methods for large deformation analysis of non-linear structures , 1996 .

[16]  Jiun-Shyan Chen,et al.  A stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin mesh-free methods , 2001 .

[17]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A unified stability analysis of meshless particle methods , 2000 .

[18]  H. Karutz,et al.  A quadtree data structure for the coupled finite‐element/element‐free Galerkin method , 2002 .

[19]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Element‐free Galerkin methods , 1994 .

[20]  I. Babuska,et al.  The partition of unity finite element method: Basic theory and applications , 1996 .

[21]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Reproducing kernel particle methods , 1995 .

[22]  Hui-Ping Wang,et al.  New boundary condition treatments in meshfree computation of contact problems , 2000 .

[23]  T. Rabczuk,et al.  Coupling of meshfree methods with finite elements : Basic concepts and test results , 2006 .

[24]  Qiong Zhou,et al.  Sled tests and simulations of offset deformable barrier , 2005 .