Hydraulic conductivity field characterization from the joint inversion of hydraulic heads and self‐potential data

Pumping tests can be used to estimate the hydraulic conductivity field from the inversion of hydraulic head data taken intrusively in a set of piezometers. Nevertheless, the inverse problem is strongly underdetermined. We propose to add more information by adding self-potential data taken at the ground surface during pumping tests. These self-potential data correspond to perturbations of the electrical field caused directly by the flow of the groundwater. The coupling is electrokinetic in nature that is due to the drag of the excess of electrical charges existing in the pore water. These self-potential signals can be easily measured in field conditions with a set of the nonpolarizing electrodes installed at the ground surface. We used the adjoint-state method for the estimation of the hydraulic conductivity field from measurements of both hydraulic heads and self potential during pumping tests. In addition, we use a recently developed petrophysical formulation of the streaming potential problem using an effective charge density of the pore water derived directly from the hydraulic conductivity. The geostatistical inverse framework is applied to five synthetic case studies with different number of wells and electrodes and thickness of the confining unit. To evaluate the benefits of incorporating the self-potential data in the inverse problem, we compare the cases in which the data are combined or not. Incorporating the self-potential information improves the estimate of hydraulic conductivity field in the case where the number of piezometers is limited. However, the uncertainty of the characterization of the hydraulic conductivity from the inversion of the self-potential data is dependent on the quality of the distribution of the electrical conductivity used to solve the Poisson equation. Consequently, the approach discussed in this paper requires a precise estimate of the electrical conductivity distribution of the subsurface and requires therefore new strategies to be developed for the joint inversion of the hydraulic and electrical conductivity distributions.

[1]  André Revil,et al.  Streaming potential in porous media: 2. Theory and application to geothermal systems , 1999 .

[2]  Minghui Jin,et al.  AN ITERATIVE STOCHASTIC INVERSE METHOD: CONDITIONAL EFFECTIVE TRANSMISSIVITY AND HYDRAULIC HEAD FIELDS , 1995 .

[3]  Jet-Chau Wen,et al.  Joint interpretation of sequential pumping tests in unconfined aquifers , 2013 .

[4]  M. Meju,et al.  Characterization of heterogeneous near‐surface materials by joint 2D inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data , 2003 .

[5]  Calvin G. Clyde,et al.  Evaluation of the rate of flow through porous media using electrokinetic phenomena , 1969 .

[6]  Jörg Renner,et al.  Self‐potential signals induced by periodic pumping tests , 2008 .

[7]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  Rapid field application of hydraulic tomography for resolving aquifer heterogeneity in unconsolidated sediments , 2013 .

[8]  A. Hördt,et al.  Hydraulic conductivity estimation from induced polarisation data at the field scale — the Krauthausen case history , 2007 .

[9]  D. Chapman,et al.  LI. A contribution to the theory of electrocapillarity , 1913 .

[10]  André Revil,et al.  Tomography of the Darcy velocity from self‐potential measurements , 2007 .

[11]  J. Friborg.  Experimental and theoretical investigations into the streaming potential phenomenon with special reference to applications in glaciated terrain , 1997 .

[12]  Kristopher L. Kuhlman,et al.  Theory of transient streaming potentials associated with axial-symmetric flow in unconfined aquifers , 2009 .

[13]  M. Riva,et al.  Joint Inversion of Steady-State Hydrologic and Self-Potential Data for 3D Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site , 2011 .

[14]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Laboratory sandbox validation of transient hydraulic tomography , 2007 .

[15]  T.-C. Jim Yeh,et al.  An iterative geostatistical inverse method for steady flow in the vadose zone , 1996 .

[16]  Chunmiao Zheng,et al.  Geophysical constraints on contaminant transport modeling in a heterogeneous fluvial aquifer. , 2006, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[17]  Niklas Linde,et al.  Derivation of Soil‐Specific Streaming Potential Electrical Parameters from Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Partially Saturated Soils , 2012, 1209.6335.

[18]  Salvatore Straface,et al.  Application of kriging with external drift to estimate hydraulic conductivity from electrical-resistivity data in unconsolidated deposits near Montalto Uffugo, Italy , 2000 .

[19]  M. R. Sheffer,et al.  Forward modelling and inversion of streaming potential for the interpretation of hydraulic conditions from self-potential data , 2007 .

[20]  S. Hubbard,et al.  Petrophysical properties of saprolites from the Oak Ridge Integrated Field Research Challenge site, Tennessee , 2013 .

[21]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Inverse stochastic moment analysis of steady state flow in randomly heterogeneous media , 2006 .

[22]  Kristopher L. Kuhlman,et al.  Basin‐Scale Transmissivity and Storativity Estimation Using Hydraulic Tomography , 2008, Ground water.

[23]  James J. Butler,et al.  Inherent Limitations of Hydraulic Tomography , 2010, Ground water.

[24]  Steven M. Gorelick,et al.  Inferring the relation between seismic slowness and hydraulic conductivity in heterogeneous aquifers , 2000 .

[25]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[26]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Reconstruction of the Water Table from Self‐Potential Data: A Bayesian Approach , 2009, Ground water.

[27]  G. Petiau,et al.  NOISE, TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT, AND LONG TIME STABILITY OF ELECTRODES FOR TELLURIC OBSERVATIONS* , 1980 .

[28]  Marian Smoluchowski,et al.  Contribution à la théorie de l'endosmose électrique et de quelques phénomènes corrélatifs , 1924 .

[29]  G. Quincke.  Ueber eine neue Art elektrischer Ströme , 1859 .

[30]  A. Revil,et al.  Stochastic joint inversion of temperature and self-potential data to determine the permeability of geological units in sedimentary basins , 2009 .

[31]  S. Finsterle,et al.  Electrokinetic coupling in unsaturated porous media. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[32]  M. Karaoulis,et al.  Review: Some low-frequency electrical methods for subsurface characterization and monitoring in hydrogeology , 2012, Hydrogeology Journal.

[33]  André Revil,et al.  A Sandbox Experiment of Self‐Potential Signals Associated with a Pumping Test , 2004 .

[34]  Moid U. Ahmad.  A LABORATORY STUDY OF STREAMING POTENTIALS , 1964 .

[35]  Akhil Datta-Gupta,et al.  Resolution and uncertainty in hydrologic characterization , 1997 .

[36]  A. Ogilvy,et al.  DEFORMATIONS OF NATURAL ELECTRIC FIELDS NEAR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES , 1973 .

[37]  A. Revil,et al.  Coupled hydromechanical and electromagnetic disturbances in unsaturated porous materials , 2013, Water resources research.

[38]  C. Doussan,et al.  Streaming current generation in two‐phase flow conditions , 2007 .

[39]  B. Malama.  Theory of transient streaming potentials in coupled unconfined aquifer‐unsaturated zone flow to a well , 2014 .

[40]  P. Kitanidis.  On the geostatistical approach to the inverse problem , 1996 .

[41]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Sequential aquifer tests at a well field, Montalto Uffugo Scalo, Italy , 2007 .

[42]  Nicolas Florsch,et al.  Determination of permeability from spectral induced polarization in granular media , 2010 .

[43]  B. Hubbard,et al.  Cross‐coupled flow modeling of coincident streaming and electrochemical potentials and application to subglacial self‐potential data , 2003 .

[44]  Po-zen Wong,et al.  Determination of rock properties by low‐frequency AC electrokinetics , 1999 .

[45]  W. R. Sill,et al.  Self-potential modeling from primary flows , 1983 .

[46]  A. Revil,et al.  Effective conductivity and permittivity of unsaturated porous materials in the frequency range 1 mHz–1GHz , 2013, Water resources research.

[47]  Zhenya Zhu,et al.  Experimental measurements of the streaming potential and seismoelectric conversion in Berea sandstone , 2013 .

[48]  A. Jardani,et al.  Self‐potential tomography applied to the determination of cavities , 2006 .

[49]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Comparison of aquifer characterization approaches through steady state groundwater model validation: A controlled laboratory sandbox study , 2010 .

[50]  Shuyun Liu,et al.  Effectiveness of hydraulic tomography: Sandbox experiments , 2001 .

[51]  Karl E. Butler,et al.  Cancellation of multiple harmonic noise series in geophysical records , 2003 .

[52]  Olaf A. Cirpka,et al.  Fully coupled hydrogeophysical inversion of synthetic salt tracer experiments , 2010 .

[53]  Kristopher L. Kuhlman,et al.  A semi-analytical solution for transient streaming potentialsassociated with confined aquifer pumping tests , 2009 .

[54]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  Coupled inverse problems in groundwater modeling: 2. Identifiability and experimental design , 1990 .

[55]  Walter A. Illman,et al.  Steady-state hydraulic tomography in a laboratory aquifer with deterministic heterogeneity: Multi-method and multiscale validation of hydraulic conductivity tomograms , 2007 .

[56]  H. Helmholtz,et al.  Studien über electrische Grenzschichten , 1879 .

[57]  W. Durand.  Dynamics of Fluids , 1934 .

[58]  G. Petiau.  Second Generation of Lead-lead Chloride Electrodes for Geophysical Applications , 2000 .

[59]  J. Avouac,et al.  Streaming potential measurements 1. Properties of the electrical double layer from crushed rock samples , 1999 .

[60]  R. Brauchler,et al.  Structure-coupled joint inversion of geophysical and hydrological data , 2013, 1701.01360.

[61]  E. Rizzo,et al.  Estimation of hydraulic conductivity and water table map in a large‐scale laboratory model by means of the self‐potential method , 2010 .

[62]  A Revil,et al.  A Potential‐Based Inversion of Unconfined Steady‐State Hydraulic Tomography , 2009, Ground water.

[63]  M. Jackson,et al.  Multiphase streaming potential in sandstones saturated with gas/brine and oil/brine during drainage and imbibition , 2011 .

[64]  André Revil,et al.  Principles of electrography applied to self‐potential electrokinetic sources and hydrogeological applications , 2003 .

[65]  M. Gouy,et al.  Sur la constitution de la charge électrique à la surface d'un électrolyte , 1910 .

[66]  S. Troisi,et al.  Numerical modelling of self-potential signals associated with a pumping test experiment , 2005 .

[67]  Michael A. Mooney,et al.  Saline pulse test monitoring with the self‐potential method to nonintrusively determine the velocity of the pore water in leaking areas of earth dams and embankments , 2012 .

[68]  Salvatore Straface,et al.  Self‐potential signals associated with pumping tests experiments , 2004 .

[69]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  A field proof‐of‐concept of aquifer imaging using 3‐D transient hydraulic tomography with modular, temporarily‐emplaced equipment , 2012 .

[70]  Ludovic Métivier,et al.  Two-dimensional permittivity and conductivity imaging by full waveform inversion of multioffset GPR data: a frequency-domain quasi-Newton approach , 2014 .

[71]  M. Voltz,et al.  Monitoring of an infiltration experiment using the self‐potential method , 2006 .

[72]  André Revil,et al.  Streaming potentials of granular media: Influence of the Dukhin and Reynolds numbers , 2007 .

[73]  Y. Rubin,et al.  Estimating the hydraulic conductivity at the south oyster site from geophysical tomographic data using Bayesian Techniques based on the normal linear regression model , 2001 .