EEG alpha power changes reflect response inhibition deficits after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in humans

Brain damage due to traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been associated with deficits in executive functions and the dynamic control of behaviour. Event-related brain potentials and spectral power data were recorded from eight TBI participants and eight matched controls while they completed a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. The TBI group was found to be significantly impaired at the task compared to controls, and exhibited abnormal N2 and P3 waveform components in response to NoGo stimuli relative to controls. Significant correlations were also found between alpha power, Go-trial RT and errors. We conclude that abnormal activity in the structures damaged in this group may render such patients less capable of maintaining a state of alpha desynchronisation compared to controls, resulting in poorer performance on the task.

[1]  G. Huston.  The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. , 1987, The Journal of rheumatology.

[2]  C. Carter,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex activity and impaired self-monitoring of performance in patients with schizophrenia: an event-related fMRI study. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Saccadic disinhibition in schizophrenia patients and their first-degree biological relatives , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  D. Stuss,et al.  Assessment of strategic self-regulation in traumatic brain injury: its relationship to injury severity and psychosocial outcome. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[5]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Implication of right frontostriatal circuitry in response inhibition and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[6]  I. Nimmo-Smith,et al.  The structure of normal human attention: The Test of Everyday Attention , 1996, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[7]  H. Garavan,et al.  Dissociable Executive Functions in the Dynamic Control of Behavior: Inhibition, Error Detection, and Correction , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  O. Andreassen,et al.  Mice Deficient in Cellular Glutathione Peroxidase Show Increased Vulnerability to Malonate, 3-Nitropropionic Acid, and 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,5,6-Tetrahydropyridine , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Parieto‐occipital ∼1 0Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of visual attention mechanisms , 1998 .

[10]  K. Konrad,et al.  Inhibitory control in children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). , 2000, Brain injury.

[11]  I. Robertson,et al.  `Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Changing plans: a high density electrical mapping study of cortical control. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  Relative contributions of intracortical and thalamo-cortical processes in the generation of alpha rhythms, revealed by partial coherence analysis. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  S. Scott,et al.  Enhancing the Sensitivity of a Sustained Attention Task to Frontal Damage: Convergent Clinical and Functional Imaging Evidence , 2003, Neurocase.

[15]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Shane M. O’Mara,et al.  Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.