Comparative Study of Groundwater-Induced Subsidence for London and Delhi Using PSInSAR

Groundwater variation can cause land-surface movement, which in turn can cause significant and recurrent harm to infrastructure and the water storage capacity of aquifers. The capital cities in the England (London) and India (Delhi) are witnessing an ever-increasing population that has resulted in excess pressure on groundwater resources. Thus, monitoring groundwater-induced land movement in both these cities is very important in terms of understanding the risk posed to assets. Here, Sentinel-1 C-band radar images and the persistent scatterer interferometric synthetic aperture radar (PSInSAR) methodology are used to study land movement for London and National Capital Territory (NCT)-Delhi from October 2016 to December 2020. The land movement velocities were found to vary between −24 and +24 mm/year for London and between −18 and +30 mm/year for NCT-Delhi. This land movement was compared with observed groundwater levels, and spatio-temporal variation of groundwater and land movement was studied in conjunction. It was broadly observed that the extraction of a large quantity of groundwater leads to land subsidence, whereas groundwater recharge leads to uplift. A mathematical model was used to quantify land subsidence/uplift which occurred due to groundwater depletion/rebound. This is the first study that compares C-band PSInSAR-derived land subsidence response to observed groundwater change for London and NCT-Delhi during this time-period. The results of this study could be helpful to examine the potential implications of ground-level movement on the resource management, safety, and economics of both these cities.

[1]  Pabitra Mitra,et al.  Spatial-Correlation Based Persistent Scatterer Interferometric Study for Ground Deformation , 2017, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing.

[2]  Y. Maghsoudi,et al.  Extreme subsidence in a populated city (Mashhad) detected by PSInSAR considering groundwater withdrawal and geotechnical properties , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[3]  S. Marsh,et al.  Monitoring of Ground Movement and Groundwater Changes in London Using InSAR and GRACE , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[4]  Francesca Cigna,et al.  Characterisation of hydraulic head changes and aquifer properties in the London Basin using Persistent Scatterer Interferometry ground motion data , 2016 .

[5]  L. Bateson,et al.  Terrafirma : London H-3 Modelled Product : comparison of PS data with the results of a groundwater abstraction related subsidence model , 2009 .

[6]  A. Novellino,et al.  Modelling groundwater rebound in recently abandoned coalfields using DInSAR , 2020 .

[7]  Yasser Maghsoudi,et al.  How Groundwater Level Fluctuations and Geotechnical Properties Lead to Asymmetric Subsidence: A PSInSAR Analysis of Land Deformation over a Transit Corridor in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[8]  M. Puma,et al.  Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade , 2017, Nature.

[9]  Hehua Zhu,et al.  Land subsidence due to groundwater drawdown in Shanghai , 2004 .

[10]  Mahdi Motagh,et al.  Multi-sensor remote sensing analysis of coal fire induced land subsidence in Jharia Coalfields, Jharkhand, India , 2021, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[11]  R. Dearden,et al.  A geological model of London and the Thames Valley, southeast England , 2014 .

[12]  C. Keller,et al.  Multivariate interpolation to incorporate thematic surface data using inverse distance weighting (IDW) , 1996 .

[13]  Fabio Rocca,et al.  Nonlinear subsidence rate estimation using permanent scatterers in differential SAR interferometry , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Jun Yang,et al.  Risk assessment of mega-city infrastructures related to land subsidence using improved trapezoidal FAHP. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Philippa Jane Mason,et al.  Retrospective InSAR Analysis of East London during the Construction of the Lee Tunnel , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[16]  T. Burbey,et al.  Review: Regional land subsidence accompanying groundwater extraction , 2011 .

[17]  S. Shekhar,et al.  Groundwater Environment in Delhi, India , 2016 .

[18]  Mingliang Gao,et al.  Analysis of the influence of groundwater on land subsidence in Beijing based on the geographical weighted regression (GWR) model. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  Hongdong Fan,et al.  Monitoring and Analysis of Surface Deformation in Mining Area Based on InSAR and GRACE , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Katherine Royse,et al.  Geological 3D modelling : scientific discovery and enhanced understanding of the subsurface, with examples from the UK , 2010 .

[21]  Chaofeng Zeng,et al.  Influence of the opening timing of recharge wells on settlement caused by dewatering in excavations , 2019, Journal of Hydrology.

[22]  Eloise Kendy,et al.  Groundwater depletion: A global problem , 2005 .

[23]  José Tuxpan-Vargas,et al.  Land subsidence by groundwater over-exploitation from aquifers in tectonic valleys of Central Mexico: A review , 2018, Engineering Geology.

[24]  Jinjian Chen,et al.  Effects of groundwater exploitation and recharge on land subsidence and infrastructure settlement patterns in Shanghai , 2021 .

[25]  Elisabeth Simonetto,et al.  An Overview on Interferometric SAR Software and a Comparison Between DORIS and SARSCAPE Packages , 2009, OGRS.