Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations

Although Mendeley bookmarking counts appear to correlate moderately with conventional citation metrics, it is not known whether academic publications are bookmarked in Mendeley in order to be read or not. Without this information, it is not possible to give a confident interpretation of altmetrics derived from Mendeley. In response, a survey of 860 Mendeley users shows that it is reasonable to use Mendeley bookmarking counts as an indication of readership because most (55%) users with a Mendeley library had read or intended to read at least half of their bookmarked publications. This was true across all broad areas of scholarship except for the arts and humanities (42%). About 85% of the respondents also declared that they bookmarked articles in Mendeley to cite them in their publications, but some also bookmark articles for use in professional (50%), teaching (25%), and educational activities (13%). Of course, it is likely that most readers do not record articles in Mendeley and so these data do not represent all readers. In conclusion, Mendeley bookmark counts seem to be indicators of readership leading to a combination of scholarly impact and wider professional impact.

[1]  Mary F. Casserly,et al.  Usage and Usability Assessment: Library Practices and Concerns , 2002 .

[2]  Diego Ponte,et al.  Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers' Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation and Dissemination , 2011 .

[3]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Scholarly Reading by Academic Staff: Summary Results of a Study Conducted in 2012 at Two Universities in Australia , 2014 .

[4]  Helen Belefant-Miller Ms,et al.  How, What, and Why Science Faculty Read , 2000 .

[5]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  The use and value of scientific journals: past, present and future , 2001 .

[7]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Electronic journals and user behavior: A review of recent research , 2007 .

[8]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal: Book Reviews , 2005 .

[9]  Nirmali Chakraborty,et al.  Activities and Reasons for Using Social Networking Sites by Research Scholars in NEHU: A Study on Facebook and ResearchGate , 2012 .

[10]  C. Laymon.  A. study , 2018, Predication and Ontology.

[11]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Patterns in Electronic Journal Usage: Challenging the Composition of Geographic Consortia , 2002 .

[12]  E. Smith.  Changes in Faculty Reading Behaviors: The Impact of Electronic Journals on the University of Georgia , 2003 .

[13]  Oliver Obst.  Patterns and costs of printed and online journal usage. , 2003, Health information and libraries journal.

[14]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement , 2011, Scientometrics.

[15]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Diversity in the e-journal use and information-seeking behaviour of UK researchers , 2010, J. Documentation.

[16]  K. T. L. Vaughan.  Changing use patterns of print journals in the digital age: Impacts of electronic equivalents on print chemistry journal use , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  User diversity: as demonstrated by deep log analysis , 2008, Electron. Libr..

[18]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Electronic Journals and Changes in Scholarly Article Seeking and Reading Patterns , 2008, D Lib Mag..

[20]  James H. Walther.  Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians and Publishers , 2001 .

[21]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Using and Reading Scholarly Literature. , 1999 .

[22]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Reading behaviour and electronic journals , 2002, Learn. Publ..

[23]  David King,et al.  Identifying Audiences of E-Infrastructures - Tools for Measuring Impact , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  Kristy Lundahl,et al.  Residents’ Patient-Specific Clinical Questions: Opportunities for Evidence-Based Learning , 2005, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[25]  Stella Korobili,et al.  Factors that Influence Information-Seeking Behavior: The Case of Greek Graduate Students , 2011 .

[26]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact , 2012, ArXiv.

[27]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  A study of factors that affect the information-seeking behavior of academic scientists , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Using Twitter During an Academic Conference: The #iswc2009 Use-Case , 2010, ICWSM.

[29]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Relying on electronic journals: Reading patterns of astronomers , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Henk Voorbij,et al.  The Use of Electronic Journals by Dutch Researchers: A Descriptive and Exploratory Study , 2006 .

[31]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Cross Country Comparison of Scholarly E-Reading Patterns in Australia, Finland, and the United States , 2010 .

[33]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines , 2003, J. Documentation.

[34]  Sibele Fausto,et al.  Blogging : Indexing and Registering the Change in Science 2 . 0 , 2012 .

[35]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Article and book reading patterns of scholars: findings for publishers , 2012, Learn. Publ..

[36]  Christine Urquhart,et al.  Understanding student information behavior in relation to electronic information services: Lessons from longitudinal monitoring and evaluation, Part 1 , 2007 .

[37]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Evaluating altmetrics , 2013, Scientometrics.

[38]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Open access scientometrics and the UK Research Assessment Exercise , 2007, Scientometrics.

[39]  Ziming Liu,et al.  Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years , 2005, J. Documentation.

[40]  Gunilla Widén,et al.  Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: A Finnish case study , 2011, Electron. Libr..

[41]  W. Shelburne.  E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and behaviors , 2009 .

[42]  Christine Urquhart,et al.  Understanding student information behavior in relation to electronic information services: Lessons from longitudinal monitoring and evaluation, Part 2 , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[43]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Journal reading patterns and preferences of pediatricians. , 2007, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[44]  Martin J. Brennan,et al.  A Snapshot of Early Adopters of E-Journals: Challenges to the Library , 2002 .

[45]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? , 2014, Scientometrics.

[46]  Judit Bar-Ilan.  JASIST 2001–2010 , 2012 .

[47]  Paul Ginsparg,et al.  Positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[48]  Xuemei Ge.  Information-Seeking Behavior in the Digital Age: A Multidisciplinary Study of Academic Researchers , 2010, Coll. Res. Libr..

[49]  Nancy Jane Butkovich.  Use studies : A selective review , 1996 .

[50]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  Users, narcissism and control – tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century , 2012 .

[51]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  The information-seeking practices of engineers: searching for documents as well as for people , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[52]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Exploring the Virtual Space of Academia , 2012, COOP.

[53]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Academia.edu: Social network or Academic Network? , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[54]  Ian Graham,et al.  Evidence-based medicine and the practicing clinician , 1999, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[55]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Social media use in the research workflow , 2011, Inf. Serv. Use.

[56]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching: An automatic analysis of online syllabuses , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[57]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[58]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[59]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[60]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Usage bibliometrics , 2011, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[61]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: What makes a difference? , 2009 .

[62]  Christine Urquhart,et al.  Understanding student information behavior in relation to electronic information services: Lessons from longitudinal monitoring and evaluation, Part 1 , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[63]  David Pullinger,et al.  Electronic Journals and User Behaviour: Learning for the Future from the Superjournal Project , 2002 .

[64]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  What is the impact of the publications read by the different Mendeley users? Could they help to identify alternative types of impact? PLoS ALM Workshop, San Francisco , 2013 .

[65]  R. Procter,et al.  Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[66]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Modeling the information behaviour of software engineers using a work - task framework , 2006, ASIST.

[67]  Mike Thelwall.  Journal impact evaluation: a webometric perspective , 2012, Scientometrics.

[68]  Daril A. Vilhena.  Beyond bibliometrics : Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact , 2022 .

[69]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies , 2003 .

[70]  Lishi Kwasitsu,et al.  Information-seeking behavior of design, process, and manufacturing engineers , 2003 .

[71]  図書館情報大学.  Proceedings of International Symposium on Research, Development and Practice in Digital Libraries 1997 : ISDL'97 : November, 18-21, 1997, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan , 1997 .

[72]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[73]  Gloria J. Leckie,et al.  Modeling the Information Seeking of Professionals: A General Model Derived from Research on Engineers, Health Care Professionals, and Lawyers , 1996, The Library Quarterly.

[74]  Stephen S. Murray,et al.  The bibliometric properties of article readership information , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[75]  Diego Ponte,et al.  Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers' Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation and Dissemination , 2011 .

[76]  Rachael Green Clemens.  Usage and Usability Assessment , 2003 .

[77]  P. B. Boyce,et al.  Relying on electronic journals: Reading patterns of astronomers: Research Articles , 2005 .

[78]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[79]  Stephen S. Murray,et al.  The bibliometric properties of article readership information: Research Articles , 2005 .

[80]  Mohd Rafiz Salji,et al.  Information Seeking Behavior , 2012 .

[81]  Lei Wu,et al.  Scholarly journal information‐seeking and reading patterns of faculty at five US universities , 2009, Learn. Publ..

[82]  Matthew C Kiernan,et al.  What is impact? , 2011, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[83]  Tina E. Chrzastowski.  Assessing the Value of Ebooks to Academic Libraries and Users , 2011 .

[84]  C. Tenopir,et al.  UK scholarly reading and the value of library resources , 2012 .

[85]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services , 2013, PloS one.