Age-Related Slowing: Perceptuomotor, Decision, or Attention Decline?

Age-related slowing is well documented but its origin remains unclear. A first validation study (Study 1) performed in 46 participants examined the effect of attention allocation (manipulated through a dual task) on various portions of individual simple reaction time (SRT) distribution (minimum, centile 5, centile 50, and centile 95 RTs). It showed that attention ‘deprivation’ due to a secondary task is not uniform throughout the distribution but impaired mainly the ability to produce a large number of fast responses. Study 2 investigated in 88 healthy participants age-related slowing of perceptual, motor, decision, and attentional processes using SRT and choice reaction time (CRT), finger tapping, and visual inspection time tests. It showed that the majority of SRT slowing after the age of 40 is due to lengthening of centile 5 RT, suggesting perceptuomotor slowing, an interpretation supported by longer visual inspection time and lower tapping frequency. After 60 years, SRT lengthening was due to a further lengthening of the centile 5–centile 50 SRT index, suggesting the participation of attentional decline. These findings support the hypothesis that age-related slowing in simple repetitive tasks is mainly related to slowing at the stage of perceptuomotor processes, and after 60 years, to additional decline of attention.

[1]  D. Madden,et al.  Age-related differences in the processing of redundant visual dimensions. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[2]  J. Fisk,et al.  Age-Related Impairment in Executive Functioning: Updating, Inhibition, Shifting, and Access , 2004, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[3]  O. Godefroy,et al.  SRT lengthening: role of an alertness deficit in frontal damaged patients , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  T. Braver,et al.  A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[5]  T. Salthouse Aging and measures of processing speed , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[6]  O. Godefroy,et al.  Binary choice in patients with prefrontal or posterior brain damage. A relative judgement theory analysis , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[8]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  Intelligence and inspection time: Achievements, prospects, and problems. , 1996 .

[9]  O. Godefroy,et al.  Reliability of reaction time measurements in brain-damaged patients , 1994, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[10]  O. Godefroy,et al.  Vigilance and effects of fatigability, practice and motivation on simple reaction time tests in patients with lesion of the frontal lobe , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  L. J. Chapman,et al.  Do Children and the Elderly Show Heightened Semantic Priming? How to Answer the Question. , 1994 .

[12]  A D Baddeley,et al.  The decline of working memory in Alzheimer's disease. A longitudinal study. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  B. G. Rule,et al.  Adult age differences in working memory. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[14]  J. Cerella Information processing rates in the elderly. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  R Gottsdanker,et al.  Age and simple reaction time. , 1982, Journal of gerontology.

[16]  P. Panek Age differences in perceptual style, selective attention, and perceptual-motor reaction time. , 1978, Experimental aging research.

[17]  S. Folstein,et al.  “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician , 1975 .

[18]  S. Link The relative judgment theory of two choice response time , 1975 .

[19]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[20]  Shankweiler Dp Effects of success and failure instructions on reaction time in patients with brain damage. , 1959 .

[21]  J. Poitrenaud,et al.  Standardisation et étalonnage français du Mini Mental State (MMS) version GRÉCO , 2003 .

[22]  D. Wechsler,et al.  Echelle d'intelligence de Wechsler pour adultes , 2000 .

[23]  D. Stuss,et al.  Reaction time and variability 5 and 10 years after traumatic brain injury. , 1996, Brain injury.

[24]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Interrelations of age, health, and speed. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[25]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[26]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[27]  C. Villardita,et al.  Neuropsychological test performances and normal aging. , 1985, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[28]  D. Shankweiler Effects of success and failure instructions on reaction time in patients with brain damage. , 1959, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.