Effect size calculations and single subject designs

This study compared visual analyses with five alternative methods for assessing the magnitude of effect with single subject designs. Each method was successful in detecting intervention effect. When rank ordered, each method was consistent in identifying the participants with the largest effect. We recommend the use of the standard mean difference (SMDall) formula and we believe the use of a regression equation for calculating effect size in single subject data should be avoided.

[1]  Mercer Jennifer Ann,et al.  PUBLICATION manual of the American Psychological Association. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  S W Bijou,et al.  A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[3]  J. Gerring A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[4]  B. S. Parsonson,et al.  2 – The Analysis and Presentation of Graphic Data , 1978 .

[5]  Ann Casey,et al.  A Methodology for the Quantitative Synthesis of Intra-Subject Design Research , 1985 .

[6]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  The Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1987 .

[7]  Phillip J. Brantley,et al.  Criterion-related validity of self-report measures of female heterosocial functioning , 1988 .

[8]  D. Crimmins,et al.  Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior , 1988, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[9]  A. Repp,et al.  Reinforcement-Based Reductive Procedures: A Review of 20 Years of their Use with Persons with Severe or Profound Retardation , 1990 .

[10]  B. Gorman,et al.  Calculating effect sizes for meta-analysis: the case of the single case. , 1993, Behaviour research and therapy.

[11]  B. Iwata,et al.  Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[12]  Robert E. O'Neill,et al.  Functional Assessment and Program Development for Problem Behavior: A Practical Handbook , 1996 .

[13]  B. Gorman,et al.  Design and Analysis of Single-Case Research , 1996 .

[14]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Summarizing Single-Subject Research , 1998, Behavior modification.

[15]  Scott L. Hershberger,et al.  Meta-analysis of single-case designs , 1999 .

[16]  A. Baron,et al.  Human sensitivity to reinforcement: A comment on Kollins, Newland, and Critchfield’s (1997) quantitative literature review , 1999, The Behavior analyst.

[17]  Robert H. Horner,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Positive Behavior Support , 2000 .

[18]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  How to Summarize Single-Participant Research: Ideas and Applications , 2001, The Meta-Analysis Research in Special Education.

[19]  T. Conway,et al.  Case study Phonological rehabilitation of acquired phonologic alexia , 2003 .

[20]  Richard I. Parker,et al.  Evaluating Single-Case Research Data: A Comparison of Seven Statistical Methods , 2003 .

[21]  J. Schaller,et al.  Enhancing Appropriate Social Behaviors for Children with Autism in General Education Classrooms: An Analysis of Six Cases , 2003 .