Absorptive Capacity and Ambidexterity in R&D: Linking Technology Alliance Diversity and Firm Innovation

The aim of this study is to examine how firms realize the benefits associated with a diverse range of technology alliances. We propose and test the hypothesis that firms’ knowledge combinative capabilities mediate the relationship between technology alliance diversity and innovation. Using panel data for Spanish manufacturing companies during the period 2004–2011, we provide evidence that firms’ absorptive capacity and ambidexterity in R&D serve as mediating mechanisms between technology alliance diversity and innovative performance. Our study advances the literature on technology alliances by showing how firms use their portfolios of technology alliances to form their combinative capabilities, and subsequently, to enhance innovation outcomes.

[1]  P. Blau.  Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure , 1978 .

[2]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[3]  Andrew A. King,et al.  Prospects for Developing Absorptive Capacity Through Internal Information Provision , 2004 .

[4]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Organizational designs and innovation streams , 2010 .

[5]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[6]  A. Tiwana.  Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity , 2008 .

[7]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance , 2010 .

[8]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A dynamic Theory of Business Institutions , 1995 .

[9]  Matthew S. Fritz,et al.  Mediation analysis. , 2019, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Alliance Portfolio Internationalization and Firm Performance , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[11]  J. Shaver.  Testing for Mediating Variables in Management Research: Concerns, Implications, and Alternative Strategies , 2005 .

[12]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[13]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Returns to alliance portfolio diversity : The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity , 2014 .

[15]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[16]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[17]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[18]  J. Lejarraga,et al.  Size, R&D productivity and Decision Styles , 2014 .

[19]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[20]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Do alliances promote knowledge flows , 2006 .

[21]  B. Looy,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach , 2005 .

[22]  M. Nieto,et al.  The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation , 2007 .

[23]  H. Greve.  Exploration and exploitation in product innovation , 2007 .

[24]  Ignacio Fernández-de-Lucio,et al.  Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry , 2009 .

[25]  C. V. Beers,et al.  R&D Cooperation, Partner Diversity, and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Analysis† , 2014 .

[26]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[27]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[28]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Exploring the Antecedents of Potential Absorptive Capacity and Its Impact on Innovation Performance , 2008 .

[29]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[30]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  Alliance portfolio diversity, radical and incremental innovation : The moderating role of technology management , 2013 .

[31]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  Personnel Economics for Managers , 1997 .

[32]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Managing External Knowledge Flows: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[33]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[34]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[35]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[36]  Zeki Simsek.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding , 2009 .

[37]  Ram Mudambia,et al.  Proactive R&D management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model , 2015 .

[38]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[39]  R. Dodhia.  A Review of Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.) , 2005 .

[40]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Location, Decentralization, and Knowledge Sources for Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Geert Duysters,et al.  *Alliance Capability as a Mediator between Experience and Alliance Performance: An Empirical Investigation into the Alliance Capability Development Process , 2005 .

[42]  C. A. Benavides-Velasco,et al.  Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification , 2008 .

[43]  HolmqvistMikael.  Experiential Learning Processes of Exploitation and Exploration Within and Between Organizations , 2004 .

[44]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[45]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[46]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[47]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[48]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Mediation with Dichotomous Outcomes , 2013 .

[49]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-Enhancing and Cost-Increasing Effects of Open Innovation* , 2010 .

[50]  Tony Davila,et al.  Making Innovation Work: How to Manage It, Measure It, and Profit from It , 2005 .

[51]  Arvind Parkhe.  Interfirm Diversity, Organizational Learning, and Longevity in Global Strategic Alliances , 1991 .

[52]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Advancing the Conceptualization and Operationalization of Novelty in Organizational Research , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[54]  R. Jacobson.  Unobservable Effects and Business Performance , 1990 .

[55]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Organizational designs for R&D , 2002 .

[56]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[57]  Priit Vahter,et al.  Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages , 2014 .

[58]  F. Malerba.  Innovation and the dynamics and evolution of industries: Progress and challenges , 2007 .

[59]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[60]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[61]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[62]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[63]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Manage Alliance Portfolio Diversity? The Diversity‐Performance Relationship and the Moderating Effects of Experience and Capability , 2012 .

[64]  Tianjiao Xia,et al.  Unpacking Open Innovation: Absorptive Capacity, Exploratory and Exploitative Openness, and the Growth of Entrepreneurial Biopharmaceutical Firms , 2016 .

[65]  Jaider Vega Jurado,et al.  Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry , 2009 .

[66]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  D. Third.  OECD/Eurostat . Oslo Manual-Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Paris, France: , 2005 .

[68]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[69]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  The Initial Conditions Problem in Dynamic, Nonlinear Panel Data Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity , 2002 .

[70]  J. Walsh,et al.  The Academy of Management annals , 2008 .

[71]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Fortune favors the prepared firm , 1994 .

[72]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Unravelling the Process from Closed to Open Innovation: Evidence from Mature, Asset-Intensive Industries , 2010 .

[73]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[74]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[75]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Resource Orchestration to Create Competitive Advantage , 2010 .

[76]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[77]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[78]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[79]  Xiaoming He,et al.  Firm resources, competitive actions and performance: investigating a mediated model with evidence from the in‐vitro diagnostics industry , 2011 .

[80]  Arie Y. Lewin,et al.  Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[81]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[82]  E. Thiry,et al.  Something old, something new , 2015, Journal of feline medicine and surgery.

[83]  Qing Cao,et al.  Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[84]  R. Katila,et al.  Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations , 2004 .

[85]  Abel Lucena,et al.  The Organizational Designs of R&D Activities and their Performance Implications: Empirical Evidence for Spain , 2009 .

[86]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[87]  Dovev Lavie.  The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[88]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[89]  Warren B. Powell.  Exploration vs. Exploitation , 2007 .

[90]  Michael Dinger,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and Information Systems Research: Review, Synthesis, and Directions for Future Research , 2012, MIS Q..

[91]  Charlene L. Nicholls-Nixon.  Responding to technological change: Why some firms do and others die , 1995 .

[92]  S. Zahra,et al.  The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance A study of biotechnology firms , 2001 .

[93]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[94]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[95]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Determinants of Alliance Portfolio Complexity and its Effect on Innovative Performance of Companies , 2008 .

[96]  Aija Leiponen,et al.  Skills and innovation , 2005 .

[97]  Rachelle C. Sampson.  R&D Alliances and Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation , 2007 .

[98]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[99]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[100]  C. Bloch,et al.  Oslo Manual - Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edition: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data , 2005 .