Receptor flexibility for large-scale in silico ligand screens: chances and challenges.

An important contribution to today's computer-aided drug design is the automated screening of large compound databases against structurally resolved protein receptors targets. The introduction of ligand flexibility has, by now, become a standardized procedure. In contrast, a general approach to treat target degrees of freedom is still to be found, a consequence of the extreme increase of computational complexity, which comes along with the relaxation of protein degrees of freedom. In this chapter, we discuss in some detail both benefits and present limitations of target flexibility for high-throughput in silico database screens. Among the benefits are an improved diversity of binding modes, which allows one to identify a wider class of drug candidates. The limitations are related to a diminishing docking accuracy and an increased number of false hits. Using the thymidine kinase receptor and ten known inhibitors as an example, we describe in detail how target flexibility was implemented and how it affected the screening performance.

[1]  P Schelling,et al.  Nucleoside binding site of Herpes simplex type 1 thymidine kinase analyzed by X‐ray crystallography , 2000, Proteins.

[2]  R. Cramer,et al.  Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  W. Wenzel,et al.  Comparison of stochastic optimization methods for receptor-ligand docking , 2002 .

[4]  R Abagyan,et al.  High-throughput docking for lead generation. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[5]  E. Fischer.  Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme , 1894 .

[6]  N. Metropolis,et al.  The Monte Carlo method. , 1949 .

[7]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Increasing Diversity in In-silico Screening with Target Flexibility , 2005, CompLife.

[8]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Impact of receptor conformation on in silico screening performance , 2004 .

[10]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Application of the stochastic tunneling method to high throughput database screening , 2003 .

[11]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[12]  G Folkers,et al.  The effect of substrate binding on the conformation and structural stability of Herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[13]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Fluctuation analysis and accuracy of a large‐scale in silico screen , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[14]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Development of an all-atom force field for heterocycles. Properties of liquid pyridine and diazenes , 1998 .

[15]  D. Rognan,et al.  Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Yang Yang,et al.  An extensible and systematic force field, ESFF, for molecular modeling of organic, inorganic, and organometallic systems , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[17]  George W. A. Milne,et al.  National Cancer Institute Drug Information System 3D Database , 1994, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[18]  R M Knegtel,et al.  Efficacy and selectivity in flexible database docking , 1999, Proteins.

[19]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998 .

[20]  W. Wenzel,et al.  Stochastic Tunneling Approach for Global Minimization of Complex Potential Energy Landscapes , 1999 .