DO HIGHWAYS FRAGMENT SMALL MAMMAL POPULATIONS

Small mammal populations separated by highways may be partially or completely isolated from one another due to low dispersal capabilities, low probability of surviving highway crossing attempts, and/or avoidance of areas adjacent to highways. Threats to small mammals are problematic at the ecosystem level because of their importance as seed dispersers and their role as prey for predators, such as marten, wolverine, and raptors. Our objective is to determine how movement and gene flow are affected by two- and four-lane highways for small mammals in forested areas of western Montana. We trapped small mammals at five highways sites for two summers using a mark-recapture protocol. We gave each animal an individual mark so that we could follow their movements through time and collected either hair or a small tissue sample for genetic analyses. We are assessing potential fragmentation of small mammals populations by comparing movement rates and gene flow adjacent to the highway versus across the highway. Our preliminary results suggest that highways inhibit movement of small mammals. Movement was hindered more by four-lane than by two-lane highways. We observed stronger effects on redbacked voles and chipmunks, and weaker effects on deer mice. Deer mice were responsible for the vast majority of highway crossings, while only one vole and no chipmunks crossed four-lane

[1]  P. Jarne,et al.  Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  Annabelle Andrews,et al.  Fragmentation of Habitat by Roads and Utility Corridors: A Review , 1990 .

[3]  L. Tevis.  Stomach Contents of Chipmunks and Mantled Squirrels in Northeastern California , 1953 .

[4]  B. D. Dow,et al.  The use of microsatellite analysis in population biology: background, methods and potential applications. , 1994, EXS.

[5]  H. Mader,et al.  Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields , 1984 .

[6]  M. Fenton,et al.  The Effects of Roads on Populations of Small Mammals , 1974 .

[7]  N. Slade,et al.  Road Crossing in Sigmodon hispidus and Microtus ochrogaster , 1984 .

[8]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[9]  T. Kozlowski,et al.  Ectomycorrhizae: their ecology and physiology , 1973 .

[10]  P. Waser,et al.  Genetic signatures of interpopulation dispersal. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Andrew F. Bennett,et al.  ROADS, ROADSIDES AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION: A REVIEW , 1991 .

[12]  I. Spellerberg.  Ecological effects of roads and traffic: a literature review , 1998 .

[13]  C. Maser,et al.  Mycophagy of red-backed voles in Oregon and Washington , 1982 .

[14]  J. Trappe,et al.  FUNGAL-SMALL MAMMAL INTERRELATIONSHIPS WITH EMPHASIS ON OREGON CONIFEROUS FORESTS" , 1978 .

[15]  W. Sheppe.  ISLAND POPULATIONS AND GENE FLOW IN THE DEER MOUSE, PEROMYSCUS LEUCOPUS , 1965 .

[16]  L. Adams.  Consumption of Ponderosa Pine seed by small mammals. , 1950 .

[17]  S. Wright.  Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volume 3: Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions , 1977 .

[18]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites , 1994, Nature.

[19]  D. C. Andersen,et al.  Blarina brevicauda and Peromyscus leucopus Reduce Overwinter Survivorship of Acorn Weevils in an Indiana Hardwood Forest , 1993 .

[20]  W. Werner.  Mammals of the Thousand Islands Region, New York , 1956 .

[21]  The Effect of Pupal Predators on a Population of Winter Moth, Operophtera brumata (L.) (Hydriomenidae) , 1967 .

[22]  C. Frissell,et al.  Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities , 2000 .

[23]  C. Maser,et al.  Role of three rodents in forest nitrogen fixation in western Oregon: another aspect of mammal-mycorrhizal fungus-tree mutualism , 1986 .

[24]  Brenda S. Horn,et al.  Small Mammal Populations and Food Selection in Relation to Timber Harvest Practices in the Western Cascade Mountains , 1983 .

[25]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  CAPTURE-RECAPTURE STUDIES FOR MULTIPLE STRATA INCLUDING NON-MARKOVIAN TRANSITIONS , 1993 .

[26]  R. P. Weckworth,et al.  Marten food habits and population fluctuations in Montana. , 1962 .

[27]  G. Gerlach,et al.  Fragmentation of Landscape as a Cause for Genetic Subdivision in Bank Voles , 2000 .

[28]  E. Korpimäki,et al.  DOES MOBILITY OR SEX OF VOLES AFFECT RISK OF PREDATION BY MAMMALIAN PREDATORS , 1998 .

[29]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: Volume 2, The Theory of Gene Frequencies , 1968 .

[30]  F. Allendorf,et al.  The One‐Migrant‐per‐Generation Rule in Conservation and Management , 1996 .

[31]  C. Johnson.  Interactions between mammals and ectomycorrhizal fungi. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  B. Rannala,et al.  Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Gregory D. Hayward,et al.  Ecology of Boreal Owls in the Northern Rocky Mountains, Usa , 1993 .

[34]  J. Hayes,et al.  Seasonal Variation in Mycophagy by the Western Red-backed Vole, Clethrionomys californicus, in Southwestern Oregon. , 1986 .

[35]  J. Trappe,et al.  Food habits of the northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus) in Oregon , 1985 .

[36]  James D. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATES OF MOVEMENT AND SITE FIDELITY USING MARK-RESIGHT DATA OF WINTERING CANADA GEESE' , 1991 .