To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the application of guidelines in the decision making process leading to medical or surgical treatment for aortic stenosis in elderly patients. DESIGN Cohort analysis based on a prospective inclusive registry. SETTING 205 consecutive patients (⩾ 70 years) with clinically relevant isolated aortic stenosis and without serious comorbidity, seen for the first time in the Doppler-echocardiographic laboratories of three university hospitals in the Netherlands. RESULTS The initial choice was surgery in 94 patients and medical treatment in 111. Only 59% of the patients who should have had valve replacement according to the practice guidelines were actually offered surgical treatment. These were mainly symptomatic patients under 80 years of age with a high gradient. Operative mortality (30 days) was only 2%. The three year survival was 80% in the surgical group (17 deaths among 94 patients) and 49% in the medical group (43/111). Multivariate analysis showed that only patients with a high baseline risk, mainly determined by impaired left ventricular function, had a significantly better three year survival with surgical treatment than with medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS In daily practice, elderly patients with clinically relevant symptomatic aortic stenosis are often denied surgical treatment. This study indicates that a surgical approach, especially where there is impaired systolic left ventricular function, is associated with better survival.

[1]  E. Antman,et al.  Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary , 1998, Circulation.

[2]  R. Gibbons,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Executive Summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). , 1998, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[3]  M. McLain.  Specific activity. , 1998, Health physics.

[4]  J. Seward,et al.  Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators. , 1997, Circulation.

[5]  J. Hung,et al.  A specific activity questionnaire to measure the functional capacity of cardiac patients. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  A. J. Dunning,et al.  Analysis of risk factors for excess mortality after aortic valve replacement. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  J. Forfar,et al.  How should we manage symptomatic aortic stenosis in the patient who is 80 or older? , 1995, British heart journal.

[8]  T. Bashore,et al.  Left ventricular performance improves late after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and reduced ejection fraction. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  J. Daubert,et al.  Surgery for Aortic Stenosis in Elderly Patients: A study of Surgical Risk and Predictive Factors , 1994, Circulation.

[10]  L. Cohn,et al.  Aortic Valve Replacement in the Elderly Effect of Gender and Coronary Artery Disease on Operative Mortality , 1993, Circulation.

[11]  P. Ruygrok,et al.  Aortic valve replacement in the elderly. , 1993, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[12]  K. Hiduchenko.  Do health maintenance organizations control costs or shift costs? , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  J. Heikkilä,et al.  Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  G. Thibault,et al.  Too old for what? , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S Greenfield,et al.  The Importance of Co-existent Disease in the Occurrence of Postoperative Complications and One-Year Recovery in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement: Comorbidity and Outcomes After Hip Replacement , 1993, Medical care.

[16]  S. Pauker,et al.  You're never too old. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  M. Rosenqvist,et al.  Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians with aortic stenosis: a case-control study. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  M. Quiñones,et al.  Determination of severity of valvular aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography and relation of findings to clinical outcome and agreement with hemodynamic measurements determined at cardiac catheterization. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  O. Lund.  Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Reasons for earlier operative intervention. , 1990, Circulation.

[20]  K. Bailey,et al.  The natural history of adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  A. Galloway,et al.  Ten-year experience with aortic valve replacement in 482 patients 70 years of age or older: operative risk and long-term results. , 1990, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  I. Palacios,et al.  Octogenarians with aortic stenosis. Outcome after aortic valve replacement. , 1989, Circulation.

[23]  C. Otto,et al.  Doppler echocardiography in adults with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness. , 1988, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Clinical, haemodynamic and angiographic predictors of survival in unoperated patients with aortic stenosis , 1988 .

[25]  D. Kaiser,et al.  Comparison of outcome of asymptomatic to symptomatic patients older than 20 years of age with valvular aortic stenosis. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  K. Bailey,et al.  Natural history of candidates for balloon aortic valvuloplasty. , 1987, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[27]  A. Selzer.  Changing aspects of the natural history of valvular aortic stenosis. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  N C Nanda,et al.  Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  L. Hatle,et al.  Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1985, Circulation.

[30]  J. Seward,et al.  Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. , 1985, Circulation.

[31]  S. Rich,et al.  Determination of left ventricular ejection fraction by visual estimation during real-time two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1982, American heart journal.

[32]  M. A. Chizner,et al.  The natural history of aortic stenosis in adults. , 1980, American heart journal.

[33]  M. Quiñones,et al.  Percentage of shortening of the echocardiographic left ventricular dimension. Its use in determining ejection fraction and stroke volume. , 1978, Chest.

[34]  E. H. Estes,et al.  A point-score system for the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. , 1968, American heart journal.

[35]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Impaired Rate of Left Ventricular Filling in Idiopathic Hypertrophic Subaortic Stenosis and Valvular Aortic Stenosis , 1968, Circulation.

[36]  B. Carabello,et al.  Aortic stenosis , 2018, Rapid Cardiac Care.

[37]  J. Rankin.  Cerebral Vascular Accidents in Patients over the Age of 60: II. Prognosis , 1957, Scottish medical journal.

[38]  S. Takagi,et al.  Natural History , 2019, Nature.

[39]  D. Faxon,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) , 1998 .