Spatially Compact MR-Guided Kernel EM for PET Image Reconstruction

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a highly sensitive functional and molecular imaging modality which can measure picomolar concentrations of an injected radionuclide. However, the physical sensitivity of PET is limited, and reducing the injected dose leads to low count data and noisy reconstructed images. A highly effective way of reducing noise is to reparameterize the reconstruction in terms of MR-derived spatial basis functions. Spatial basis functions derived using the kernel method have demonstrated excellent noise reduction properties and maintain shared PET-MR detailed structures. However, as previously shown in the literature, the MR-guided kernel method may lead to excessive smoothing of structures that are only present in the PET data. This paper makes two main contributions in order to address this problem: first, we exploit the potential of the MR-guided kernel method to form more spatially compact basis functions which are able to preserve PET-unique structures, and second, we consider reconstruction at the native MR resolution. The former contribution notably improves the recovery of structures which are unique to the PET data. These adaptations of the kernel method were compared to the conventional implementation of the MR-guided kernel method and also to maximum likelihood expectation maximization, in terms of ability to recover PET unique structures for both simulated and real data. The spatially compact kernel method showed clear visual and quantitative improvements in the reconstruction of the PET unique structures, relative to the conventional kernel method for all sizes of PET unique structures investigated, whilst maintaining to a large extent the impressive noise mitigating and detail preserving properties of the conventional MR-guided kernel method. We therefore conclude that a spatially compact parameterization of the MR-guided kernel method, should be the preferred implementation strategy in order to obviate unnecessary losses in PET-unique details.

[1]  J. Bowsher,et al.  Utilizing MRI information to estimate F18-FDG distributions in rat flank tumors , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[2]  Charles A Mistretta,et al.  Dynamic PET Denoising with HYPR Processing , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of MRI-guided attenuation correction techniques in time-of-flight brain PET/MRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[4]  G. Strang,et al.  The solution of nonlinear finite element equations , 1979 .

[5]  Kernelised EM image reconstruction for dual-dataset PET studies , 2016, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[6]  P. Green On Use of the EM Algorithm for Penalized Likelihood Estimation , 1990 .

[7]  E U Mumcuoğlu,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction of PET images: methodology and performance analysis. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Andrew J Reader,et al.  Patch-based image reconstruction for PET using prior-image derived dictionaries , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  David Atkinson,et al.  Joint reconstruction of PET-MRI by exploiting structural similarity , 2014, Inverse Problems.

[10]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  BrainWeb: Online Interface to a 3D MRI Simulated Brain Database , 1997 .

[11]  Shuhang Chen,et al.  Sparse representation and dictionary learning penalized image reconstruction for positron emission tomography , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  MR-Guided Kernel EM Reconstruction for Reduced Dose PET Imaging , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[14]  Vesna Sossi,et al.  Incorporating HYPR de-noising within iterative PET reconstruction (HYPR-OSEM). , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Dynamic PET Image reconstruction for parametric imaging using the HYPR kernel method , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[16]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[17]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Jianfeng Gao,et al.  Scalable training of L1-regularized log-linear models , 2007, ICML '07.

[19]  Florian Wiesinger,et al.  Joint estimation of activity and attenuation for PET using pragmatic MR-based prior: application to clinical TOF PET/MR whole-body data for FDG and non-FDG tracers , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Anatomically-aided PET reconstruction using the kernel method , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Unconstrained image reconstruction with resolution modelling does not have a unique solution , 2014, EJNMMI Physics.

[24]  Yue Zhao,et al.  Application of kernel method in fluorescence molecular tomography , 2017, BiOS.

[25]  E. Levitan,et al.  A Maximum a Posteriori Probability Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Image Reconstruction in Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Philip Novosad,et al.  MR-guided dynamic PET reconstruction with the kernel method and spectral temporal basis functions , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Guobao Wang,et al.  PET Image Reconstruction Using Kernel Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI: A Novel Approach Combining Pattern Recognition and Atlas Registration , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  Alex Smola,et al.  Kernel methods in machine learning , 2007, math/0701907.

[30]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[31]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A non-local algorithm for image denoising , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[32]  H. Herzog,et al.  Alternative methods for attenuation correction for PET images in MR-PET scanners , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[33]  P. Green Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[34]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Kernel-based anatomically-aided diffuse optical tomography reconstruction , 2017, BiOS.

[35]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Direct Patlak Reconstruction From Dynamic PET Data Using the Kernel Method With MRI Information Based on Structural Similarity , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Yue Zhao,et al.  Anatomical image-guided fluorescence molecular tomography reconstruction using kernel method , 2017, Journal of biomedical optics.

[37]  Jieqing Jiao,et al.  Detail-Preserving PET Reconstruction with Sparse Image Representation and Anatomical Priors , 2015, IPMI.

[38]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Bayesian PET image reconstruction incorporating anato-functional joint entropy , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[39]  J. Nocedal Updating Quasi-Newton Matrices With Limited Storage , 1980 .

[40]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  Fast Quasi-Newton Algorithms for Penalized Reconstruction in Emission Tomography and Further Improvements via Preconditioning , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[41]  Claude Comtat,et al.  Practical considerations for image-based PSF and blobs reconstruction in PET , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  J. Nuyts The use of mutual information and joint entropy for anatomical priors in emission tomography , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.