Self-organization in automation - the IDEAS pre-demonstrator

While the application of IT in automation gains traction, mostly motivated by the introduction of Service Orientated Approaches and Multiagent modelling, it is sometimes unclear to practitioners what is the full potential and boundaries of such concepts and technologies. The FP7 IDEAS project is focused in the design and development of Multiagent systems in a Mechatronic context which, to a great extent, implies that Mechatronic Agents must consider and respect mechanical/physical constraints while delivering the widely acknowledged (yet elusively demonstrated) characteristics that may render Agent-based control unique in respect to tolerance to disturbances, plug-ability and scalability. In this context, the present paper details the preliminary proof of concept prototype that validates the IDEAS Mechatronic Agent Architecture. The focus of this early demonstrator is to enlighten on how self-organization, inspired by the Evolvable Assembly System (EAS) Paradigm, can be exploited towards promoting the above mentioned characteristics. The main lessons learned, open points and future developing directions are distilled as the prototype is presented.

[1]  Mauro Onori,et al.  Evolvable Production Systems: An Integrated View on Recent Developments , 2009, DET.

[2]  M. Onori,et al.  An architecture development approach for evolvable assembly systems , 2005, (ISATP 2005). The 6th IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning: From Nano to Macro Assembly and Manufacturing, 2005..

[3]  Kanji Ueda,et al.  A Concept for Bionic Manufacturing Systems Based on DNA-type Information , 1992, PROLAMAT.

[4]  Marie-Pierre Gleizes,et al.  Self-Organisation and Emergence in MAS: An Overview , 2006, Informatica.

[5]  Agostino Poggi,et al.  Developing Multi-agent Systems with JADE , 2007, ATAL.

[6]  L. Ribeiro,et al.  An architecture for a fault tolerant highly reconfigurable shop floor , 2008, 2008 6th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics.

[7]  A. Hofmann,et al.  IT support of mechatronic networks: A brief survey , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Volodymyr Vasyutynskyy,et al.  Software Agents in Industry: A Customized Framework in Theory and Praxis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[9]  Sanja Petrovic,et al.  SURVEY OF DYNAMIC SCHEDULING IN MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[10]  Bernd Scholz-Reiter,et al.  Dynamic flexible flow shop problems—Scheduling heuristics vs. autonomous control , 2010 .

[11]  Damien Trentesaux,et al.  A stigmergic approach for dynamic routing of active products in FMS , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[12]  Radu F. Babiceanu,et al.  Development and Applications of Holonic Manufacturing Systems: A Survey , 2006, J. Intell. Manuf..

[13]  F. Musharavati RECONFIGURABLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 2010 .

[14]  W. Xiang,et al.  Ant colony intelligence in multi-agent dynamic manufacturing scheduling , 2008, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[15]  Jose Barata,et al.  Where evolvable production systems meet complexity science , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM).