Process mining analysis of conceptual modeling behavior of novices - empirical study using JMermaid modeling and experimental logging environment

Feedback is usually available to novices when a task is complete.This research aims at revealing perspectives of process-oriented feedback.We realize this in the context of one learning case - conceptual modelling.We used a novel approach by means of process mining of learners' processes.Findings include patterns that establish a basis for process-oriented feedback. Previous studies on learning challenges in the field of modeling focus on cognitive perspectives, such as model understanding, modeling language knowledge and perceptual properties of graphical notation by novice business analysts as major sources affecting model quality. In the educational context outcome feedback is usually applied to improve learning achievements. However, not many research publications have been written observing the characteristics of a modeling process itself that can be associated with better/worse learning outcomes, nor have any empirically validated results been reported on the observations of modeling activities in the educational context. This paper attempts to cover this gap for conceptual modeling. We analyze modeling behavior (conceptual modeling event data of 20 cases, 10.000 events in total) using experimental logging functionality of the JMermaid modeling tool and process mining techniques. The outcomes of the work include modeling patterns that are indicative for worse/better learning performance. The results contribute to (1) improving teaching guidance for conceptual modeling targeted at process-oriented feedback, (2) providing recommendations on the type of data that can be useful in observing a modeling behavior from the perspective of learning outcomes. In addition, the study provides first insights for learning analytics research in the domain of conceptual modeling.

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[2]  Nianwen Xue,et al.  CoNLL-2011 Shared Task: Modeling Unrestricted Coreference in OntoNotes , 2011, CoNLL Shared Task.

[3]  Søren Lauesen,et al.  Preventing Requirement Defects: An Experiment in Process Improvement , 2001, Requirements Engineering.

[4]  P. Hall Tracing the Progress of Process Tracing , 2012, European Political Science.

[5]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[6]  Jan Recker,et al.  How Novices Model Business Processes , 2010, BPM.

[7]  Arne Sølvberg,et al.  Understanding quality in conceptual modeling , 1994, IEEE Software.

[8]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Handbook of Conceptual Modeling - Theory, Practice, and Research Challenges , 2011 .

[9]  M. Jou,et al.  CREATING INTERACTIVE WEB-BASED ENVIRONMENTS TO SCAFFOLD CREATIVE REASONING AND MEANINGFUL LEARNING : FROM PHYSICS TO PRODUCTS , 2010 .

[10]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Tracing the Process of Process Modeling with Modeling Phase Diagrams , 2011, Business Process Management Workshops.

[11]  Ryan S. Baker,et al.  The State of Educational Data Mining in 2009: A Review and Future Visions. , 2009, EDM 2009.

[12]  Chris Marshall,et al.  Enterprise modeling with UML: designing successful software through business analysis , 2000 .

[13]  Geert Poels,et al.  A visual analysis of the process of process modeling , 2014, Information Systems and e-Business Management.

[14]  George Siemens,et al.  Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education , 2014 .

[15]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  ProM: The Process Mining Toolkit , 2009, BPM.

[16]  S. Narciss Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks , 2007 .

[17]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Requirements Engineering for Embedded Systems: An Investigation of Industry Needs , 2011, REFSQ.

[18]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  The Need for a Process Mining Evaluation Framework in Research and Practice , 2007, Business Process Management Workshops.

[19]  Monique Snoeck,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of feedback enabled simulation in teaching conceptual modeling , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Erik Duval,et al.  Goal-oriented visualizations of activity tracking: a case study with engineering students , 2012, LAK.

[21]  D. DavisFred,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology , 1989 .

[22]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[23]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Reasoning on UML class diagrams , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[24]  B. Zimmerman Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects , 2008, American Educational Research Journal.

[25]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  A Fundamental View on the Process of Conceptual Modeling , 2005, ER.

[26]  Patrick Wessa,et al.  A constructivist approach in a blended e-learning environment for statistics , 2015, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[27]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[28]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[29]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Data mining in education , 2013, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[30]  Albert Endres,et al.  A handbook of software and systems engineering - empirical observations, laws and theories , 2003, The Fraunhofer IESE series on software engineering.

[31]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[32]  Wendy W. Chapman,et al.  A Simple Algorithm for Identifying Negated Findings and Diseases in Discharge Summaries , 2001, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[33]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[34]  George Siemens,et al.  Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration , 2012, LAK.

[35]  Christina Keller,et al.  User Acceptance of Virtual Learning Environments: A Case Study from Three Northern European Universities , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Marek Hatala,et al.  A qualitative evaluation of evolution of a learning analytics tool , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State of the Art , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[38]  Monique Snoeck,et al.  Consistency by Construction: The Case of MERODE , 2003, ER.

[39]  Nicholas P. Vitalari,et al.  Differences Between Novice and Expert Systems Analysts: What Do We Know and What Do We Do? , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Janyce Wiebe,et al.  Learning Subjective Language , 2004, CL.

[41]  John Fritz,et al.  Classroom walls that talk: Using online course activity data of successful students to raise self-awareness of underperforming peers , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[42]  Marian Petre,et al.  Why looking isn't always seeing: readership skills and graphical programming , 1995, CACM.

[43]  Monique Snoeck,et al.  Enterprise Information Systems Engineering : The MERODE Approach , 2014 .

[44]  Marcin Szlenk Formal Semantics and Reasoning about UML Class Diagram , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Dependability of Computer Systems.

[45]  V. Shute Focus on Formative Feedback , 2007 .

[46]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[47]  Yair Wand,et al.  Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[48]  Jan Mendling,et al.  What Makes Process Models Understandable? , 2007, BPM.

[49]  Said Hadjerrouit Object-Oriented Software Development Education: a Constructivist Framework , 2005, Informatics Educ..

[50]  Manfred A. Jeusfeld,et al.  Conceptual Modeling for Novel Application Domains , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[51]  Mario Piattini,et al.  A conceptual modeling quality framework , 2011, Software Quality Journal.

[52]  John P. Buerck,et al.  Facilitating Self-Regulated Learning With Technology , 2011 .

[53]  Jochen De Weerdt,et al.  Process Mining for the multi-faceted analysis of business processes - A case study in a financial services organization , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[54]  H. Mcclelland,et al.  Learning environments. , 2004, Accident and emergency nursing.