Simultaneous Multislice Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Kidney: A Systematic Analysis of Image Quality

Objectives The aims of this study were to implement a protocol for simultaneous multislice (SMS) accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the kidneys and to perform a systematic analysis of image quality of the data sets. Materials and Methods Ten healthy subjects and 5 patients with renal masses underwent DWI of the kidney in this prospective institutional review board–approved study on a 3 T magnetic resonance scanner. Simultaneous multislice DWI echo-planar sequences (acceleration factors [AFs] 2 and 3) were compared with conventional echo-planar DWI as reference standard for each acquisition scheme. The following 3 acquisition schemes were applied: comparison A, with increased number of acquisitions at constant scan time; comparison B, with reduction of acquisition time; and comparison C, with increased slice resolution (constant acquisition time, increasing number of slices). Interreader reliability was analyzed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Qualitative image quality features were evaluated by 2 independent radiologists on a 5-point Likert scale. Quantification accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were assessed by region of interest analysis. Furthermore, lesion conspicuity in the 5 patients was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale by 2 independent radiologists. Results Interreader agreement was substantial with an ICC of 0.68 for the overall image quality and an ICC of 0.73 for the analysis of artifacts. In comparison A, AF2 resulted in increased SNR (P < 0.05) by 21% at stable image quality scores (image quality: P = 0.76, artifacts: P = 0.21). In comparison B, applying AF2, the scan time could be reduced by 46% without significant reduction in qualitative image quality scores (P = 0.059) or SNR (P = 0.126). In comparison C, slice resolution could be improved by 28% using AF2 with stable image quality scores and SNR. In general, AF3 resulted in reduced image quality and SNR. Significantly reduced ADC values were observed for AF3 in comparison C (cortex: P = 0.003; medulla: P = 0.001) compared with the standard echo-planar imaging sequence. The conventional DWI and the SMS DWI with AF2 showed stable lesion conspicuity ([AF1/AF2]: reader 1 [1.8/1.4] and reader 2 [1.8/1.4]). The lesion conspicuity was lower using AF3 (reader 1: 2.2 and reader 2: 1.8). Conclusions In conclusion, SMS DWI of the kidney is a potential tool to substantially reduce scan time without negative effects on SNR, ADC quantification accuracy, and image quality if an AF2 is used. Although AF3 results in even higher scan time reduction, a negative impact on image quality, SNR, ADC quantification accuracy, and lesion conspicuity must be considered.

[1]  Magalie Viallon,et al.  Improvement of renal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 3T. , 2015, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  Yulian Mytsyk,et al.  Value of the Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Differential Diagnostics of Malignant and Benign Kidney Neoplasms – Our Clinical Experience , 2014, Polish journal of radiology.

[3]  Zbigniew Serafin,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of transplanted kidneys: Preliminary report , 2014, Polish journal of radiology.

[4]  P. Weibl,et al.  Utility and limitations of 3-Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation of renal tumors. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[5]  B. K. Park,et al.  Subtype differentiation of renal cell carcinoma using diffusion-weighted and blood oxygenation level-dependent MRI. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Value of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for the Detection of Nephritis , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[7]  V. Jha,et al.  Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives , 2013, The Lancet.

[8]  Mirace Yasemin Karadeniz Bilgili,et al.  Reproductibility of apparent diffusion coefficients measurements in diffusion-weighted MRI of the abdomen with different b values. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[9]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) for multi‐slice imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  O. Kilickesmez,et al.  Non-breath-hold high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI with parallel imaging technique: apparent diffusion coefficient determination in normal abdominal organs. , 2008, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[11]  J. Polimeni,et al.  Blipped‐controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g‐factor penalty , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Justin M Ream,et al.  Simultaneous Multislice Accelerated Free-Breathing Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Liver at 3T , 2015, Abdominal Imaging.

[13]  S. Luk,et al.  MR diffusion-weighted imaging of kidney: differentiation between hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis. , 2001, Clinical imaging.

[14]  M. Erb,et al.  Simultaneous multislice diffusion‐weighted MRI of the liver: Analysis of different breathing schemes in comparison to standard sequences , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Val M Runge,et al.  Simultaneous Multislice Echo Planar Imaging With Blipped Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging Results in Higher Acceleration: A Promising Technique for Accelerated Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Skeletal Muscle , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Byung Kwan Park,et al.  Assessment of early renal allograft dysfunction with blood oxygenation level-dependent MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[17]  Roland Bammer,et al.  Single breath‐hold diffusion‐weighted imaging of the abdomen , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  M. Erb,et al.  Scan time minimization in hepatic diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of the simultaneous multislice acceleration technique with different acceleration factors and gradient preparation schemes , 2016, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[19]  Andreas Boss,et al.  Systematic analysis of the intravoxel incoherent motion threshold separating perfusion and diffusion effects: Proposal of a standardized algorithm , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Xiaoying Wang,et al.  Relationship between the renal apparent diffusion coefficient and glomerular filtration rate: Preliminary experience , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[22]  E. Hocaoğlu,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of primary solid and cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[23]  Y. Ohgiya,et al.  Utility of apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of solid renal tumors at 3T. , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[24]  M. Wyss,et al.  Whole-Body Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Feasibility Study , 2016, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[25]  Minming Zhang,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing renal pathology of chronic kidney disease: A preliminary clinical study. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[26]  G. Clarke,et al.  Measuring signal-to-noise ratio in partially parallel imaging MRI. , 2011, Medical physics.

[27]  Mengqiu Cao,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of bilateral kidneys at 3 T MRI: effects of age, gender, and laterality in healthy adults. , 2014, Clinical radiology.

[28]  Xinchun Li,et al.  In vivo evaluation of renal function using diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in type 2 diabetics with normoalbuminuria versus microalbuminuria , 2014, Frontiers of Medicine.

[29]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of focal renal lesions: a meta-analysis , 2013, European Radiology.

[30]  G H Glover,et al.  Phase‐offset multiplanar (POMP) volume imaging: A new technique , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  Moon‐gyu Lee,et al.  IgG4-related kidney disease: MRI findings with emphasis on the usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[32]  T. Kalayci,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Kidneys with Obstructive Uropathy: Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Etiology , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[33]  Wei Liu,et al.  Simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo planar imaging for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast. , 2016, European journal of radiology.

[34]  G. Remuzzi,et al.  The contribution of chronic kidney disease to the global burden of major noncommunicable diseases. , 2011, Kidney international.

[35]  H. Kundel,et al.  Measurement of observer agreement. , 2003, Radiology.