The relationship between network capabilities and innovation performance

Innovation networks provide an efficient mechanism for organizations to realize their potential for knowledge learning and innovation improvement. Firms situated within innovation networks require specific abilities to acquire the knowledge and the complementary assets that facilitate their innovation performance. Motivated by recent research studies in the area of social network and RBV, the purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of the precise manner in which network capability affects a firm’s innovation performance.,Based on the data obtained from Chinese high-tech firms, the hypotheses are tested by using hierarchical multiple regressions.,This study identifies two types of network capabilities: network structural capability and network relational capability. The findings suggest that network structural capability has a greater positive impact on innovation performance than network relational capability does within an exploration-orientated network. However, network relational capability is more positively associated with innovation performance within an exploitation-orientated network.,A firm can enhance the value of its ego network by shaping and adjusting network configurations, rather than by passively reaping the benefits from existing relationships or ties with partners.,This paper contributes to strategic management theory and social network theory by illustrating how a networked firm can enable network value and appropriate this value according to its strategic purposes and by suggesting that a firm can improve its ego network’s value through exerting its network capabilities to shape and adjust network configurations. This paper also advances the contingent approach within social network research by offering a new complementary perspective and new evidence from a Chinese context.

[1]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[2]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships , 1998 .

[3]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Leveraging tacit knowledge in alliances: The importance of using relational capabilities to build and leverage relational capital , 2006 .

[4]  Wenpin Tsai.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[5]  Véronique Ambrosini,et al.  What are Dynamic Capabilities and are They a Useful Construct in Strategic Management? , 2009 .

[6]  Nadine Roijakkers,et al.  Inter-Firm R&D Networks: The Importance of Strategic Network Capabilities for High-Tech Partnership Formation , 2006 .

[7]  C. Freeman.  Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[8]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[9]  P. Cooke.  Global Bioregions: Knowledge Domains, Capabilities and Innovation System Networks , 2006 .

[10]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[11]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[12]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[13]  D. Ernst,et al.  The way to win in cross-border alliances. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[14]  Geoffrey G. Bell.  Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness , 2005 .

[15]  Enno Siemsen,et al.  Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quadratic, and Interaction Effects , 2010 .

[16]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[17]  H. Gemünden,et al.  The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success , 2004 .

[18]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[19]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[20]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  EMBEDDED TIES AND THE ACQUISITION OF COMPETITIVE CAPABILITIES , 2005 .

[21]  K. Tsekouras,et al.  R&D collaborations: Is diversity enhancing innovation performance? , 2017 .

[22]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[23]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[24]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[25]  C. Phelps.  A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation , 2009 .

[26]  Daniel Baier,et al.  Success Factors for Innovation Management in Networks of Small and Medium Enterprises , 2011 .

[27]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[28]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management , 1992 .

[29]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[30]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[31]  K. Möller,et al.  Business Relationships and Networks: Managerial Challenge of Network Era , 1999 .

[32]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[33]  A. Neely,et al.  Networking and Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence , 2004 .

[34]  Julían Andrés,et al.  La gestión del conocimiento y su influencia en las capacidades dinámicas: Contrastación empírica en Empresas Colombianas Intensivas en uso de conocimiento , 2020 .

[35]  周青,et al.  A firm’s competitive advantage can come not only from internal resources but also from inter-firm innovation networks. This paper shows that network capabilities (i.e., network visioning capability, network constructing capability, network operating , 2014 .

[36]  J. Farley,et al.  Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis , 1993 .

[37]  Sebastian Forkmann,et al.  Networking capability in business relationships - Concept and scale development , 2012 .

[38]  Thomas Ritter.  The Networking Company , 1999 .

[39]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[40]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[41]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: a Structural Embeddedness Perspective , 2001 .

[42]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[43]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  M. Dayan,et al.  Impact of network capability on small business performance , 2015 .

[45]  Liqin Ren,et al.  Antecedents of Network Capability and Their Effects on Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test of Hi‐Tech Firms in China , 2014 .

[46]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[47]  Z. Torres,et al.  Fortalecimiento de los procesos de gestión del conocimiento en los grupos de investigación de los departamentos de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Estudio de caso: Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica y Electrónica , 2020 .

[48]  Ishtiaq P. Mahmood,et al.  Where can capabilities come from? network ties and capability acquisition in business groups , 2011 .

[49]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[50]  Geoffrey G. Bell.  RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMENTARIES:CLUSTERS, NETWORKS, AND FIRM INNOVATIVEN ESS , 2005 .

[51]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[52]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[53]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[54]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents , 2003 .

[55]  R. Burt.  The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[56]  A. Goerzen,et al.  Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships , 2007 .

[57]  Tello Clavijo,et al.  Propuesta para la estructuración de ecosistemas regionales de innovación a partir del rol de Instituciones educativas con base en el enfoque de gestión por competencias , 2020 .

[58]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[59]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[60]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[61]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[62]  A. Karamanos,et al.  Leveraging Micro‐ and Macro‐Structures of Embeddedness in Alliance Networks for Exploratory Innovation in Biotechnology , 2012 .

[63]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  Measuring network competence: some international evidence (Измерение компетенции сети фирм: несколько международных примеров) , 2002 .

[64]  A. Lewin,et al.  The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[65]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[66]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[67]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[68]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[69]  Ossi Pesämaa,et al.  Network capability, innovativeness, and performance: a multidimensional extension for entrepreneurship , 2017 .

[70]  Marcus A. Bellamy,et al.  The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation , 2014 .

[71]  David Obstfeld.  KNOWLEDGE CREATION, SOCIAL NETWORKS AND INNOVATION: AN INTEGRATIVE STUDY. , 2002 .

[72]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance , 2006 .

[73]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[74]  B. Nooteboom,et al.  Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology , 2005 .

[75]  Eva Niesten,et al.  The Impact of Alliance Management Capabilities on Alliance Attributes and Performance: A Literature Review , 2015 .

[76]  Timothy R. Hinkin.  A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations , 1995 .

[77]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[78]  Chun-Chieh Wang,et al.  Strong ties and weak ties of the knowledge spillover network in the semiconductor industry , 2017 .