Singular-value decomposition analysis of source illumination in seismic interferometry by multidimensional deconvolution

We have developed a method to analytically evaluate the relationship between the source-receiver configuration and the retrievedwavefieldinseismicinterferometryperformedbymultidimensional deconvolution (MDD). The MDD method retrieves thewavefieldwiththedesiredsource-receiverconfigurationfrom the observed wavefield without source information. We used a singular-value decomposition (SVD) approach to solve the inverse problem of MDD. By introducing SVD into MDD, we obtained quantities that revealed the characteristics of the MDD inverse problem and interpreted the effect of the initial sourcereceiverconfigurationforasurveydesign.Wenumericallysimulated the wavefield with a 2D model and investigated the rank of the incident field matrix of the MDD inverse problem. With a source array of identical length, a sparse and a dense source distribution resulted in an incident field matrix of the same rank and retrievedthesamewavefield.Therefore,theoptimumsourcedistribution can be determined by analyzing the rank of the incident field matrix of the inverse problem. In addition, the introduction ofscatterersintothemodelimprovedthesourceilluminationand effectively increased the rank, enabling MDD to retrieve a better wavefield. We found that the ambiguity of thewavefield inferred from the model resolution matrix was a good measure of the amount of illumination of each receiver by the sources. We used the field data recorded at the two boreholes from the surface sourcestosupportourresultsofthenumericalmodeling.Weevaluated the rank of incident field matrix with the dense and sparse source distribution. We discovered that these two distributions resulted in an incident field matrix of almost the same rank and retrieved almost the samewavefield as the numerical modeling.Thisiscrucialinformationfordesigningseismicexperiments using the MDD-based approach.

[1]  P. Hansen Discrete Inverse Problems: Insight and Algorithms , 2010 .

[2]  K. Wapenaar Retrieving the elastodynamic Green's function of an arbitrary inhomogeneous medium by cross correlation. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[3]  D. O’Leary,et al.  A Bidiagonalization-Regularization Procedure for Large Scale Discretizations of Ill-Posed Problems , 1981 .

[4]  Rodney Calvert,et al.  he virtual source method : Theory and case study , 2006 .

[5]  L. Yanqin,et al.  Blind seismic deconvolution using variational Bayesian method , 2014 .

[6]  J. Sheng,et al.  Interferometric/daylight seismic imaging , 2004 .

[7]  Toshifumi Matsuoka,et al.  Monitoring seismic velocity change caused by the 2011 Tohoku‐oki earthquake using ambient noise records , 2012 .

[8]  P. M. Prenter,et al.  Numerical iterative filters applied to first kind Fredholm integral equations , 1978 .

[9]  R. Snieder Extracting the Green's function from the correlation of coda waves: a derivation based on stationary phase. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[11]  C. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[12]  Michel Campillo,et al.  High-Resolution Surface-Wave Tomography from Ambient Seismic Noise , 2005, Science.

[13]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[14]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[15]  K. Wapenaar,et al.  A representation for Green's function retrieval by multidimensional deconvolution. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  David Malah,et al.  Rank Estimation and Redundancy Reduction of High-Dimensional Noisy Signals With Preservation of Rare Vectors , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  J. Hunziker,et al.  Seismic interferometry by crosscorrelation and by multidimensional deconvolution: a systematic comparison , 2010 .

[18]  Brett Harris,et al.  Field and synthetic experiments for virtual source crosswell tomography in vertical wells: Perth Basin, Western Australia , 2013 .

[19]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[20]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Improved surface‐wave retrieval from ambient seismic noise by multi‐dimensional deconvolution , 2011 .

[21]  Tad J. Ulrych,et al.  Information theory measures with application to model identification , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[22]  T. Matsuoka,et al.  Crosscorrelation of Earthquake Data Using Stationary Phase Evaluation: Insight into Reflection Structures of Oceanic Crust Surface in the Nankai Trough , 2012 .

[23]  Evert Slob,et al.  Seismic and electromagnetic controlled‐source interferometry in dissipative media , 2008 .

[24]  O. Nishizawa,et al.  A numerical study on finding an optimum model in velocity tomography by using the extended information criterion , 1995 .

[25]  J. Hunziker,et al.  Seismic interferometry using multidimensional deconvolution and crosscorrelation for crosswell seismic reflection data without borehole sources , 2011 .

[26]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Truncated Singular Value Decomposition Solutions to Discrete Ill-Posed Problems with Ill-Determined Numerical Rank , 1990, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[27]  L. Eldén Algorithms for the regularization of ill-conditioned least squares problems , 1977 .

[28]  Christoph Sens-Schönfelder,et al.  Sudden drop of seismic velocity after the 2004 Mw 6.6 mid-Niigata earthquake, Japan, observed with Passive Image Interferometry , 2009 .

[29]  Peter Gerstoft,et al.  Seismic interferometry-turning noise into signal , 2006 .

[30]  Henry F. Knauf Seismic and Electromagnetic Tunnel Detection Investigation , 1975 .

[31]  Michael G. Bostock,et al.  Seismic interferometry using non‐volcanic tremor in Cascadia , 2007 .

[32]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  High-resolution lithospheric imaging with seismic interferometry , 2010 .

[33]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Correlation of random wavefields: An interdisciplinary review , 2006 .

[34]  E. Slob,et al.  Controlled-source interferometric redatuming by crosscorrelation and multidimensional deconvolution in elastic media , 2011 .

[35]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[36]  J. Hunziker,et al.  Application of seismic interferometry by multidimensional deconvolution to crosswell seismic reflection using singular-value decomposition , 2009 .

[37]  Andrew Curtis,et al.  Directional balancing for seismic and general wavefield interferometry , 2010 .

[38]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Acquisition geometry requirements for generating virtual-source data , 2008 .

[39]  H. V. D. Vorst,et al.  SIRT- and CG-type methods for the iterative solution of sparse linear least-squares problems , 1990 .