MicroRNAs to Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 coding regions modulate embryonic stem cell differentiation

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short RNAs that direct messenger RNA degradation or disrupt mRNA translation in a sequence-dependent manner. For more than a decade, attempts to study the interaction of miRNAs with their targets were confined to the 3′ untranslated regions of mRNAs, fuelling an underlying assumption that these regions are the principal recipients of miRNA activity. Here we focus on the mouse Nanog, Oct4 (also known as Pou5f1) and Sox2 genes and demonstrate the existence of many naturally occurring miRNA targets in their amino acid coding sequence (CDS). Some of the mouse targets analysed do not contain the miRNA seed, whereas others span exon–exon junctions or are not conserved in the human and rhesus genomes. miR-134, miR-296 and miR-470, upregulated on retinoic-acid-induced differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells, target the CDS of each transcription factor in various combinations, leading to transcriptional and morphological changes characteristic of differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells, and resulting in a new phenotype. Silent mutations at the predicted targets abolish miRNA activity, prevent the downregulation of the corresponding genes and delay the induced phenotype. Our findings demonstrate the abundance of CDS-located miRNA targets, some of which can be species-specific, and support an augmented model whereby animal miRNAs exercise their control on mRNAs through targets that can reside beyond the 3′ untranslated region.

[1]  V. Ambros,et al.  The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14 , 1993, Cell.

[2]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[3]  F. Slack,et al.  The lin-41 RBCC gene acts in the C. elegans heterochronic pathway between the let-7 regulatory RNA and the LIN-29 transcription factor. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[4]  T. Tuschl,et al.  RNA interference is mediated by 21- and 22-nucleotide RNAs. , 2001, Genes & development.

[5]  T. Tuschl,et al.  Identification of Novel Genes Coding for Small Expressed RNAs , 2001, Science.

[6]  G. Hannon RNA interference : RNA , 2002 .

[7]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[8]  J. Nichols,et al.  Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2003, Cell.

[9]  D. Bartel MicroRNAs Genomics, Biogenesis, Mechanism, and Function , 2004, Cell.

[10]  John L. Bowman,et al.  Gene regulation: Ancient microRNA target sequences in plants , 2004, Nature.

[11]  R. Plasterk,et al.  Substrate requirements for let-7 function in the developing zebrafish embryo. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  R. Pillai MicroRNA function: multiple mechanisms for a tiny RNA? , 2005, RNA.

[13]  Motoki Saito,et al.  Oct-3/4 and Sox2 Regulate Oct-3/4 Gene in Embryonic Stem Cells* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Isaac Bentwich Available online , 2005 .

[15]  S. Hammond Dicing and slicing , 2005, FEBS letters.

[16]  R. Humphries,et al.  Correlation of Murine Embryonic Stem Cell Gene Expression Profiles with Functional Measures of Pluripotency , 2005, Stem cells.

[17]  A. Thomson,et al.  The Acute Box cis-Element in Human Heavy Ferritin mRNA 5′-Untranslated Region Is a Unique Translation Enhancer That Binds Poly(C)-binding Proteins* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  X. Chen,et al.  The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Yvonne Tay,et al.  A Pattern-Based Method for the Identification of MicroRNA Binding Sites and Their Corresponding Heteroduplexes , 2006, Cell.

[20]  Oliver Hobert,et al.  Perfect seed pairing is not a generally reliable predictor for miRNA-target interactions , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[21]  Austin G Smith,et al.  Nanog promotes transfer of pluripotency after cell fusion , 2006, Nature.

[22]  N. Rajewsky microRNA target predictions in animals , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Guangjin Pan,et al.  Nanog and transcriptional networks in embryonic stem cell pluripotency , 2007, Cell Research.

[24]  J. Steitz,et al.  Target mRNAs are repressed as efficiently by microRNA-binding sites in the 5′ UTR as in the 3′ UTR , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  W. Filipowicz,et al.  Repression of protein synthesis by miRNAs: how many mechanisms? , 2007, Trends in cell biology.

[26]  George Easow,et al.  Isolation of microRNA targets by miRNP immunopurification. , 2007, RNA.

[27]  Subramanya,et al.  p16 Translation Suppressed by miR-24 , 2008 .

[28]  J. George,et al.  MicroRNA‐134 Modulates the Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells, Where It Causes Post‐Transcriptional Attenuation of Nanog and LRH1 , 2008, Stem cells.

[29]  Reuven Agami,et al.  miR-148 targets human DNMT3b protein coding region. , 2008, RNA.

[30]  Kotb Abdelmohsen,et al.  p16INK4a Translation Suppressed by miR-24 , 2008, PloS one.

[31]  O. Hobert Gene Regulation by Transcription Factors and MicroRNAs , 2008, Science.