Human Remains and Identity

Before even studying human remains, it may be necessary to search for them. This implies using the discipline of forensic archaeology in order to detect anomalies which may indicate a burial site and subsequently dig that particular site and recover possible remains. Methods commonly applied for searching are aerial photography, field walking, cadaver dogs, and geophysical techniques. Once the remains have been found, recovery must occur according to archaeological techniques—not with shovels and picks but with trowels and brushes. This is crucial in order to subsequently register and preserve every single bone so that all possible diagnoses may be correctly performed (identification, possible cause of death, and time since death) along with proper interpretation of trauma. In case of charred bodies, bone fragments are often fragile and sometimes need specific treatment. In case of discovery of human remains in urban contexts, for example during the excavation of buildings, an on-site assessment of the minimum number of individuals may already help to indicate whether the remains are of forensic interest or if they belong to an older burial contexts. Keywords: forensic anthropology; forensic archaeology; field walking; excavation; cadaver dogs; stratigraphy

[1]  V. Bryant,et al.  Forensic palynology: why do it and how it works. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[2]  P. Wiltshire Consideration of some taphonomic variables of relevance to forensic palynological investigation in the United Kingdom. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[3]  Alastair Ruffell,et al.  Searching for the IRA "disappeared": ground-penetrating radar investigation of a churchyard burial site, Northern Ireland. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  H. Voorde,et al.  Evaluation of microbial soil identity in forensic science , 2004, Zeitschrift für Rechtsmedizin.

[5]  C E Moore,et al.  Analysis of pilot-related equipment and archaeological strategy in the recovery of aircrew losses from the Vietnam War. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  C. Campobasso,et al.  The forensic entomologist in the context of the forensic pathologist's role. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[7]  M. Sorg,et al.  Advances in Forensic Taphonomy : Method, Theory, and Archaeological Perspectives , 2001 .

[8]  A D Webster,et al.  Excavation of a Vietnam-era aircraft crash site: use of cross-cultural understanding and dual forensic recovery methods. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  L. M. Hoshower Forensic archeology and the need for flexible excavation strategies: a case study. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  P. S. Miller Disturbances in the soil: finding buried bodies and other evidence using ground penetrating radar. , 1996, Journal of forensic sciences.

[11]  D. Spennemann,et al.  Archaeological techniques for exhumations: a unique data source for crime scene investigations. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[12]  D. Ubelaker,et al.  The role of forensic anthropology in the recovery and analysis of Branch Davidian Compound victims: techniques of analysis. , 1995, Journal of forensic sciences.

[13]  D H Ubelaker,et al.  The role of forensic anthropology in the recovery and analysis of Branch Davidian Compound victims: recovery procedures and characteristics of the victims. , 1995, Journal of forensic sciences.