Uptake of psychosocial referrals in an outpatient cancer setting: improving service accessibility via the referral process

Abstract. The object of this study was to identify factors which influence the uptake of psychosocial services in an ambulatory cancer setting and to identify potential barriers to the access of support services in the referral process. To this end, 202 individuals attending outpatient clinics of a cancer hospital were randomised to the intervention arm of a study to assess the impact of providing co-ordinated, targeted psychosocial referrals and interventions. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the reasons for failure to offer services and for nonacceptance of services was undertaken. Individuals accepted 22% of offered services, refused 38% of offered services, indicated that services were in place in 31% of cases, and were not offered 9% of identified services. The major response from patients refusing services was "not now". Female patients (P<0.01), and individuals with a moderate to high level of depression (P=0.02), were more likely to accept services. A variety of factors impact on decisions on utilisation of support services. Recommendations on how individuals' access to these services might be improved are offered, based on an analysis of the reasons given by patients for refusal.

[1]  C. Green,et al.  Gender, psychosocial factors and the use of medical services: a longitudinal analysis. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Suzanne M. Miller,et al.  Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management , 1995, Cancer.

[3]  A. Beck,et al.  An inventory for measuring depression. , 1961, Archives of general psychiatry.

[4]  P Maguire,et al.  Helping cancer patients disclose their concerns. , 1996, European journal of cancer.

[5]  S. Fosså,et al.  Prevalence of anxiety and depression in cancer patients seen at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[6]  K. Wells,et al.  Psychiatric disorder in a sample of the general population with and without chronic medical conditions. , 1988, The American journal of psychiatry.

[7]  J. Holland,et al.  Depression and the cancer patient. , 1990, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[8]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  D. G. Altman,et al.  Assessment of and intervention for psychosocial problems in routine oncology practice. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  D. Roter,et al.  Psychosocial problem disclosure by primary care patients. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[11]  R. Sanson-Fisher,et al.  Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer , 2000, Cancer.

[12]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.

[13]  J. Zalcberg,et al.  Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  R. Sanson-Fisher,et al.  The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer , 2000, Cancer.

[15]  W. Söllner,et al.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine by cancer patients is not associated with perceived distress or poor compliance with standard treatment but with active coping behavior , 2000, Cancer.

[16]  N. Aaronson,et al.  How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients' and oncologists' preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.