DDT-based indoor residual spraying suboptimal for visceral leishmaniasis elimination in India

Significance Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), also known as kala-azar, is a major parasitic disease on the Indian subcontinent, with 85% of the disease incidence in India. As with malaria, indoor residual spraying (IRS) can be used to control and, ultimately, eliminate VL as a public health problem. However, in India, widespread resistance to dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), the insecticide used, combined with poor quality assurance (QA) of IRS and limited entomological surveillance, is hindering the VL elimination effort. Here, we present entomological abundance and insecticide resistance data and data arising from QA of IRS to explore these issues and establish an evidence base for improving the Indian VL elimination program. Unless these issues are addressed, the South Asian VL elimination effort will fail. Indoor residual spraying (IRS) is used to control visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in India, but it is poorly quality assured. Quality assurance was performed in eight VL endemic districts in Bihar State, India, in 2014. Residual dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) was sampled from walls using Bostik tape discs, and DDT concentrations [grams of active ingredient per square meter (g ai/m2)] were determined using HPLC. Pre-IRS surveys were performed in three districts, and post-IRS surveys were performed in eight districts. A 20% threshold above and below the target spray of 1.0 g ai/m2 was defined as “in range.” The entomological assessments were made in four districts in IRS and non-IRS villages. Vector densities were measured: pre-IRS and 1 and 3 mo post-IRS. Insecticide susceptibility to 4% DDT and 0.05% deltamethrin WHO-impregnated papers was determined with wild-caught sand flies. The majority (329 of 360, 91.3%) of pre-IRS samples had residual DDT concentrations of <0.1 g ai/m2. The mean residual concentration of DDT post-IRS was 0.37 g ai/m2; 84.9% of walls were undersprayed, 7.4% were sprayed in range, and 7.6% were oversprayed. The abundance of sand flies in IRS and non-IRS villages was significantly different at 1 mo post-IRS only. Sand flies were highly resistant to DDT but susceptible to deltamethrin. The Stockholm Convention, ratified by India in 2006, calls for the complete phasing out of DDT as soon as practical, with limited use in the interim where no viable IRS alternatives exist. Given the poor quality of the DDT-based IRS, ready availability of pyrethroids, and susceptibility profile of Indian sand flies, the continued use of DDT in this IRS program is questionable.

[1]  B. Banerjee National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme—Kala-azar , 2017 .

[2]  M. Coosemans,et al.  Phlebotomus argentipes Seasonal Patterns in India and Nepal , 2010, Journal of medical entomology.

[3]  A. Ranjan,et al.  Seasonal and nocturnal landing/biting behaviour of Phlebotomus argentipes (Diptera: Psychodidae) , 2001, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[4]  J. Cano,et al.  Leishmaniasis Worldwide and Global Estimates of Its Incidence , 2012, PloS one.

[5]  M. Petzold,et al.  The Indian and Nepalese programmes of indoor residual spraying for the elimination of visceral leishmaniasis: performance and effectiveness , 2011, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[6]  A. Joshi,et al.  Can visceral leishmaniasis be eliminated from Asia? , 2008, Journal of vector borne diseases.

[7]  A. Dash,et al.  How Far Are We from Visceral Leishmaniasis Elimination in Bangladesh? An Assessment of Epidemiological Surveillance Data , 2014, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

[8]  A. Ranjan,et al.  Estimation of under-reporting of visceral leishmaniasis cases in Bihar, India. , 2010, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[9]  C. K. Gurung,et al.  Toolkit for Monitoring and Evaluation of Indoor Residual Spraying for Visceral Leishmaniasis Control in the Indian Subcontinent: Application and Results , 2011, Journal of tropical medicine.

[10]  A. Joshi,et al.  Elimination of visceral leishmaniasis in Nepal: pipe-dreams and possibilities. , 2006, Kathmandu University medical journal.

[11]  N. F. Gontijo,et al.  Susceptibility to chemical insecticides of two Brazilian populations of the visceral leishmaniasis vector Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) , 2009, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[12]  C. K. Gurung,et al.  Options for Active Case Detection of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Endemic Districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, Comparing Yield, Feasibility and Costs , 2011, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[13]  R. Dhiman,et al.  Insecticide susceptibility status of Phlebotomus argentipes, a vector of visceral leishmaniasis in different foci in three states of India. , 2012, Journal of vector borne diseases.

[14]  Thakur Cp A new strategy for elimination of kala-azar from rural Bihar. , 2007 .

[15]  T. K. Barik,et al.  A note on the insecticide susceptibility status of principal malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies in four states of India. , 2014, Journal of vector borne diseases.

[16]  C. P. Thakur A new strategy for elimination of kala-azar from rural Bihar. , 2007, The Indian journal of medical research.

[17]  H. Berg Global status of DDT and its alternatives for use in vector control to prevent disease , 2009 .

[18]  D. Perry,et al.  The Role of Palmyra Palm Trees (Borassus flabellifer) and Sand Fly Distribution in Northeastern India , 2012, Journal of vector ecology : journal of the Society for Vector Ecology.

[19]  S. Sundar,et al.  Visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar): challenges ahead. , 2006, The Indian journal of medical research.

[20]  R. Poché,et al.  Bionomics of Phlebotomine Sand Flies from Three Villages in Bihar, India , 2011, Journal of vector ecology : journal of the Society for Vector Ecology.

[21]  Global status of DDT and its alternatives for use in vector control to prevent disease. , 2009 .

[22]  S. Sundar,et al.  Exposure to Phlebotomus argentipes (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) Sand Flies in Rural Areas of Bihar, India: The Role of Housing Conditions , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  M. Petzold,et al.  Chemical and environmental vector control as a contribution to the elimination of visceral leishmaniasis on the Indian subcontinent: cluster randomized controlled trials in Bangladesh, India and Nepal , 2009, BMC medicine.

[24]  S. Sharma,et al.  Resistance of sandflies to DDT in Kala-azar endemic districts of Bihar, India. , 2001, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[25]  A. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Effect of DDT on Phlebotomus sandflies in Kala-Azar endemic foci in West Bengal. , 1996, The Journal of communicable diseases.

[26]  D. Bora Epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in India. , 1999, The National medical journal of India.

[27]  T. Russell,et al.  Evaluating the feasibility of using insecticide quantification kits (IQK) for estimating cyanopyrethroid levels for indoor residual spraying in Vanuatu , 2014, Malaria Journal.

[28]  Lars Eisen,et al.  Multi-Disease Data Management System Platform for Vector-Borne Diseases , 2011, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[29]  A. Dash,et al.  Elimination of neglected tropical diseases in the South-East Asia Region of the World Health Organization. , 2010, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[30]  C. P. Thakur,et al.  Newer strategies for the kala-azar elimination programme in India. , 2009, The Indian journal of medical research.

[31]  A. Dash,et al.  Vector control interventions for visceral leishmaniasis elimination initiative in South Asia, 2005-2010 , 2012, The Indian journal of medical research.

[32]  Diwakar Singh Dinesh,et al.  Insecticide Susceptibility of Phlebotomus argentipes in Visceral Leishmaniasis Endemic Districts in India and Nepal , 2010, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[33]  P. Desjeux Leishmaniasis: current situation and new perspectives. , 2004, Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases.

[34]  M. Muniaraj The lost hope of elimination of Kala-azar (visceral leishmaniasis) by 2010 and cyclic occurrence of its outbreak in India, blame falls on vector control practices or co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus or therapeutic modalities? , 2014, Tropical parasitology.

[35]  Shyam Sundar,et al.  Model-Based Investigations of Different Vector-Related Intervention Strategies to Eliminate Visceral Leishmaniasis on the Indian Subcontinent , 2014, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[36]  S. Kaul,et al.  Impact of DDT indoor residual spraying on Phlebotomus argentipes in a kala-azar endemic village in eastern Uttar Pradesh. , 1994, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[37]  S. Sundar,et al.  Vector control by insecticide‐treated nets in the fight against visceral leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent, what is the evidence? , 2008, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.