Dynamic behavior of buildings with non-uniform stiffness along their height assessed through coupled flexural and shear beams

A novel model for assessing building behavior has been developed by coupling a Bernoulli beam with a quartic stiffness variation and a shear beam with a parabolic stiffness variation, trends that are expected in buildings designed for earthquake actions. Then the partial differential equation of motion governing the behavior of the model has been solved, obtaining analytic expressions (Closed form solutions) for mode shapes in terms of Legendre functions. These closed form solutions were validated with finite element model analyses and effects of non-uniformity of stiffness were assessed in a generalized manner. It was found that period lengthening is mild for the first mode, but for higher modes can be far more noticeable if shear stiffness at beam top is <20 % of its base value. Mode shapes also change notoriously for reductions beyond the same limit, potentially inducing large floor acceleration demands at unexpected locations. Also it was found that drift demands can be noticeably enhanced even if shear stiffness at top is 75 % of the base value, in what would be considered uniform buildings. This model has several applications for assessing the response or large stocks of buildings, calibrate complex models, assess damage on building contents, establishing in short time damage scenarios for large cities, and could be helpful for education, as emphasis is brought back on fundamental concepts.

[1]  Marvin W. Halling,et al.  Near-Source Ground Motion and its Effects on Flexible Buildings , 1995 .

[2]  Wai K. Tso,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Plane Coupled Shear Walls , 1971 .

[3]  Hong Cao,et al.  Static and dynamic analysis of straight bars with variable cross-section , 1996 .

[4]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Approximate Floor Acceleration Demands in Multistory Buildings. I: Formulation , 2005 .

[5]  Bryan Stafford Smith,et al.  Approximate Analysis of Tall Wall-Frame Structures , 1973 .

[6]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  Fragility functions for pre-Northridge welded steel moment-resisting beam-to-column connections , 2012 .

[7]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Approximate Seismic Lateral Deformation Demands in Multistory Buildings , 1999 .

[8]  Letitia Chitty LXXVIII. On the cantilever composed of a number of parallel beams interconnected by cross bars , 1947 .

[9]  W. D. Iwan,et al.  DRIFT SPECTRUM: MEASURE OF DEMAND FOR EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS , 1997 .

[10]  Yutaka Osawa 51. Response Analysis of Tall Buildings to Strong Earthquake Motions. : Part 1 Linear Response of Core-wall Buildings , 1966 .

[11]  Emilio Rosenblueth,et al.  Fundamentals of earthquake engineering , 1971 .

[12]  Jian-Ming Jin,et al.  Computation of special functions , 1996 .

[13]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Evolutionary modal identification utilizing coupled shear–flexural response—implication for multistory buildings. Part II : Application , 2006 .

[14]  Jacobo Bielak,et al.  Base Moment for a Class of Linear Systems , 1969 .

[15]  Lydik S. Jacobsen,et al.  Motion of a soil subjected to a simple harmonic ground vibration , 1930 .

[16]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  Fragility Assessment of Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections , 2010 .

[17]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Approximate Lateral Drift Demands in Multistory Buildings with Nonuniform Stiffness , 2002 .

[18]  M. Biot,et al.  Theory of Elastic Systems Vibrating under Transient Impulse with an Application to Earthquake-Proof Buildings. , 1933, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[20]  Fazlur R. Khan,et al.  Interaction of Shear Walls and Frames , 1964 .

[21]  Ronald F. Boisvert,et al.  NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions , 2010 .

[22]  Laura N. Lowes,et al.  Fragility Functions for Modern Reinforced-Concrete Beam-Column Joints , 2007 .