Frequency of movements of small mammals among Atlantic Coastal Forest fragments in Brazil

Rates of interfragment movements were estimated for small mammals inhabiting a group of eight Atlantic Coastal Forest fragments, surrounded by grassland matrix, in order to understand the degree to which each species' population was isolated. Didelphis aurita showed the greatest movement rate (19.4% of recaptures showing interfragment movements), followed by Metachirus nudicaudatus (10.0%), Philander frenata (7.5%), Nectomys squamipes (3.6%), Micoureus demerarae (1.2%) and Akodon cursor (0.25%). Interfragment movements were not detected for Caluromys philander, Oecomys concolor and Oligoryzomys nigripes. Species can be placed along a continuum which goes from species that are represented by a single population in the whole study area, through those with metapopulations, to species that have isolated populations in each fragment. Ability to move among fragments was not related to abundance in the matrix; nevertheless, such ability helps to explain the persistence of species in fragments otherwise too small to support viable populations.

[1]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Habitat Patch Connectivity and Population Survival , 1985 .

[2]  Y. Leite,et al.  Diet and vertical space use of three sympatric opossums in a Brazilian Atlantic forest reserve , 1996, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[3]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Conservation of fragmented populations , 1994 .

[4]  Bruce A. MacAllister,et al.  Forest Fragments in East-central Illinois: Islands or Habitat Patches for Mammals? , 1999 .

[5]  D. Krohne.  Dynamics of Metapopulations of Small Mammals , 1997 .

[6]  A. Liro,et al.  Movements of small mammals in the heterogeneous landscape , 1991, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  B. Weddell.  Distribution and Movements of Columbian Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus (Ord)): Are Habitat Patches Like Islands? , 1991 .

[8]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Metapopulation Viability of Leadbeater's Possum, Gymnobelideus Leadbeateri, in Fragmented Old‐Growth Forests , 1995 .

[9]  Louise H. Emmons,et al.  Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: A Field Guide , 1990 .

[10]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Relevance of the equilibrium theory of island biogeography and species-area relations to conservation with a case from Amazonia , 1986 .

[11]  J. Szacki.  Spatially structured populations: how much do they match the classic metapopulation concept? , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  G. Fonseca.  The vanishing Brazilian Atlantic forest , 1985 .

[13]  James F. Quinn,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation and isolation on species richness: evidence from biogeographic patterns , 1988, Oecologia.

[14]  T. Burkey,et al.  Extinction in nature reserves: the effect of fragmentation and the importance of migration between reserve fragments , 1989 .

[15]  T. Husband,et al.  The influence of edge on small mammals: evidence from Brazilian Atlantic forest fragments , 1998 .

[16]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Minimum viable populations : Processes of species extinction , 1986 .

[17]  Steven N. Austad,et al.  Movement Patterns and Home Range in the Common Opossum (Didelphis marsupialis) , 1987 .

[18]  Richard Shine,et al.  Inbreeding depression in an isolated population of adders Vipera berus , 1996 .

[19]  W. Laurance.  Rainforest fragmentation and the structure of small mammal communities in tropical Queensland , 1994 .

[20]  T. Quental,et al.  Population dynamics of the marsupial Micoureus demerarae in small fragments of Atlantic Coastal Forest in Brazil , 2001, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[21]  M. Soulé,et al.  Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity , 1987 .

[22]  Michael S. Gaines,et al.  Habitat Fragmentation and Movements of Three Small Mammals (Sigmodon, Microtus, and Peromyscus) , 1995 .

[23]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities , 1998 .

[24]  W. Newmark.  A land-bridge island perspective on mammalian extinctions in western North American parks , 1987, Nature.

[25]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Genetics and Conservation@@@Genetics and Conservation, A Reference for Managing Wild Animal and Plant Populations. , 1985 .

[26]  R. Cerqueira,et al.  Movement patterns of five species of small mammals in a Brazilian restinga , 1995, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[27]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[28]  M. Passamani.  Vertical stratification of small mammals in Atlantic Hill forest , 1995 .

[29]  G. Powell,et al.  Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments , 1986 .

[30]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  The Metapopulation Approach, Its History, Conceptual Domain, and Application to Conservation , 1997 .

[31]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Relating Patterns of Land‐Use Change to Faunal Biodiversity in the Central Amazon , 1994 .

[32]  I. Turner.  Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. , 1996 .

[33]  F. Fernandez,et al.  Use of space by the marsupial Micoureus demerarae in small Atlantic Forest fragments in south-eastern Brazil , 1999, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[34]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Effects of forest fragmentation on neotropical fauna: current research and data availability , 1995 .

[35]  Zhibin Zhang,et al.  Dispersal of wood mice and bank voles in an agricultural landscape , 1991 .

[36]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[37]  P. D. M. Junior,et al.  Heterogeneidade estrutural e diversidade de pequenos mamíferos em um fragmento de mata secundária de Minas Gerais, Brasil , 1995 .

[38]  T. Lovejoy,et al.  ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF FOREST FRAGMENTATION IN CENTRAL AMAZONIA , 1998 .

[39]  W. Laurance.  Ecological Correlates of Extinction Proneness in Australian Tropical Rain Forest Mammals , 1991 .