SHIRC: A simultaneous sparsity model for histopathological image representation and classification

Automated classification of histopathological images is an important research problem in medical imaging. Digital histopathology exhibits two principally distinct characteristics: 1) invariably histopathological images are multi-channel (color) with key geometric information spread across the color channels instead of being captured by luminance alone, and 2) the richness of geometric structures in such tissue imagery makes feature extraction for classification very demanding. Inspired by recent work in the use of sparsity for single channel image classification, we propose a new simultaneous Sparsity model for multi-channel Histopathological Image Representation and Classification (SHIRC). Essentially, we represent a multi-channel histopathological image as a sparse linear combination of training examples under suitable channel-wise constraints and classification is performed by solving a newly formulated simultaneous sparsity-based optimization problem. Experiments on two challenging real-world image databases: 1) provided by pathologists of the Animal Diagnostics Lab (ADL) at Pennsylvania State University, and 2) histopathological images corresponding to intraductal breast lesions [1], reveal the merits of the proposed SHIRC model over state of the art alternatives.

[1]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[2]  Metin Nafi Gürcan,et al.  Computerized classification of intraductal breast lesions using histopathological images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  ALGORITHMS FOR SIMULTANEOUS SPARSE APPROXIMATION , 2006 .

[4]  Joel H. Saltz,et al.  Histopathological Image Analysis Using Model-Based Intermediate Representations and Color Texture: Follicular Lymphoma Grading , 2009, J. Signal Process. Syst..

[5]  H. Fox Is H&E morphology coming to an end? , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Discriminative sparse representations for cervigram image segmentation , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[7]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[8]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. Part I: Greedy pursuit , 2006, Signal Process..

[9]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review , 2009, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Le Lu,et al.  Sparse Classification for Computer Aided Diagnosis Using Learned Dictionaries , 2011, MICCAI.

[11]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Object- and spatial-level quantitative analysis of multispectral histopathology images for detection and characterization of cancer , 2008 .

[12]  A. Madabhushi Digital pathology image analysis: opportunities and challenges. , 2009, Imaging in medicine.

[13]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Vishal Monga,et al.  A greedy pursuit approach to classification using multitask multivariate sparse representations , 2012 .

[15]  Yang Yu,et al.  Group sparsity based classification for cervigram segmentation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.