The presence of unknown layer of skin and fat is an obstacle to a correct estimation of the motor unit size from surface detected potentials.

To overcome problems with a strong distance-dependence of the motor unit potentials (MUPs), different methods to estimate the MU location and size have been proposed. Distance-independence of the exponent of the power function, that describes the MUP distance decline, and homogeneity of the volume conductor, are assumed in all methods. Some of them consider the exponent value as unique, irrespective of persons, muscles and their functional state. One method estimates the current exponent value. We evaluate this method by computer simulation of MUPs in infinite and semi-infinite volume conductor. Our results show that although the first assumption is not fulfilled, it does not affect considerably the estimate of the MU location and size obtained for infinite or semi-infinite homogeneous volume conductor. The errors of the MU location can be insignificant even in inhomogeneous volume conductor with a layer of lower conductivity (skin and fat) between the muscle tissue and electrode. The accurate location of the MU electrical axis is, however, not a sufficient condition for a correct MU size estimation that depends considerably on actual parameters of the layer. Thus, the surface EMG could hardly be considered as non-invasive alternative to macro EMG for detection of the enlarged MUs.