Interspecific seed discounting and the fertility cost of hybridization in an endangered species.

Hybrid fertilizations can have negative demographic effects on taxa by usurping ovules that would otherwise give rise to nonhybrid offspring. The consequent reduction in conspecific matings may be exaggerated in rare taxa and constitutes a fertility cost that has rarely been quantified. Here, the effect of interspecific mating was estimated on the fecundity of locally rare red mulberry (Morus rubra), which hybridizes with introduced white mulberry (Morus alba) and red yen white hybrids. First, the asymmetry in pollen production among red, white and hybrid mulberry in two sympatric populations was quantified. The fertility cost of hybridization was then assessed experimentally by estimating seed production and rates of interspecific mating in red mulberry trees from plots where white and hybrid mulberry trees were selectively removed. On average, the percentage of mulberry pollen per plot produced by red mulberry (8%) was significantly lower than the mean for white and hybrid mulberry combined (92%). Experimentally removing white and hybrid mulberry increased the siring fertility of red mulberry by 14% but produced no change in seed set. Results indicate that seeds of red mulberry, ordinarily sired by conspecific pollen, are being discounted through fertilization of ovules by heterospecific pollen, which may contribute to local decline of red mulberry.

[1]  K. Burgess,et al.  Habitat differentiation and the ecological costs of hybridization: the effects of introduced mulberry (Morus alba) on a native congener (M. rubra) , 2006 .

[2]  J. Pannell,et al.  Rapid Displacement of a Monoecious Plant Lineage Is Due to Pollen Swamping by a Dioecious Relative , 2006, Current Biology.

[3]  K. Burgess,et al.  Asymmetrical introgression between two Morus species (M. alba, M. rubra) that differ in abundance , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[4]  R. Ennos,et al.  HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY MATING PATTERNS IN REMNANT POPULATIONS OF THE FOREST TREEFRAXINUS EXCELSIOR L. , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  K. Burgess,et al.  Maternal and paternal contributions to the fitness of hybrids between red and white mulberry (Morus, Moraceae). , 2004, American journal of botany.

[6]  A. Ives,et al.  Consequences of recurrent gene flow from crops to wild relatives , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  R. Vaillancourt,et al.  Corrigendum to: TURNER REVIEW No. 6 Genetic pollution of native eucalypt gene pools—identifying the risks , 2003 .

[8]  N. Ellstrand Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  T. Meagher,et al.  Using empirical data to model transgene dispersal. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  R. Vaillancourt,et al.  Genetic pollution of native eucalypt gene pools—identifying the risks , 2003 .

[11]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  The Origin and Extinction of Species Through Hybridization , 2003 .

[12]  Christopher R. Herlihy,et al.  Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant , 2002, Nature.

[13]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  Predicting the Risk of Extinction through Hybridization , 2001 .

[14]  P. Tiffin,et al.  Asymmetrical crossing barriers in angiosperms , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  M. Arnold,et al.  Natural hybridisation and fitness , 2001 .

[16]  M. Arnold,et al.  Genetics and the fitness of hybrids. , 2001, Annual review of genetics.

[17]  G. Huxel Rapid displacement of native species by invasive species: effects of hybridization , 1999 .

[18]  M. Arnold,et al.  NATURAL HYBRIDIZATION: HOW LOW CAN YOU GO AND STILL BE IMPORTANT? , 1999 .

[19]  M. Arnold Natural Hybridization and Evolution , 1997 .

[20]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Extinction by hybridization and introgression , 1996 .

[21]  R. Jansen,et al.  Hybridization and the Extinction of Rare Plant Species , 1996 .

[22]  D. Schluter,et al.  The fitness of hybrids. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  M. Arnold,et al.  Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  N. Ellstrand,et al.  POPULATION GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF SMALL POPULATION SIZE: Implications for Plant Conservation , 1993 .

[25]  W. Bond,et al.  EFFICACY OF WIND POLLINATION: POLLEN LOAD SIZE AND NATURAL MICROGAMETOPHYTE POPULATIONS IN WIND‐POLLINATED STABEROHA BANKSII (RESTIONACEAE) , 1992 .

[26]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  Self- and Cross-Fertilization in Plants. II. The Selection of Self- Fertilization , 1992, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[27]  N. Ellstrand Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics , 1992 .

[28]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  Hybridization in rare plants: insights from case studies in Cercocarpus and Helianthus. , 1991 .

[29]  D. Levin The Paternity Pools of Plants , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[30]  H. A. Gleason,et al.  The New Britton and Brown Illustrated Flora of the Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, Volume 2. , 1952 .