Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do the Polyethylene Bearings Rotate?

In vivo kinematics were determined during a weightbearing deep knee bend in 39 patients implanted with four different designs of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty to assess polyethylene bearing mobility patterns and magnitudes. The femoral and tibial components and mobile polyethylene insert (implanted with four tantalum beads) were overlaid onto the fluoroscopic images using a three-dimensional model-fitting technique to determine bearing mobility. Three of the four designs were tested at a single time interval while one was evaluated at two postoperative intervals, (12 months apart) to assess changes in bearing mobility with time. All patients had polyethylene bearing rotation relative to the tibial tray and minimal rotation relative to the femoral component. The average maximum amounts of bearing rotation ranged from 8.4° to 10.3° (range, 3.0°-20.1°). In patients evaluated at two time intervals, the average maximum bearing rotation increased from 8.5° (range, 3.4°-15.5°) at 3 months to 9.8° (range, 48°-14.1°) 15 months postoperatively. The presented data demonstrates polyethylene bearing mobility occurs following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty and mobility is maintained during the time interval tested. The presence of bearing mobility should result in lower contact stresses reducing the potential for polyethylene wear.

[1]  D. D’Lima,et al.  Tibiofemoral Conformity and Kinematics of Rotating-Bearing Knee Prostheses , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  Richard D. Komistek,et al.  A robust method for registration of three-dimensional knee implant models to two-dimensional fluoroscopy images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Abnormal kinematics of the artificial knee. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of 10 Miller-Galante and five New Jersey LCS knees. , 1991, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  G Selvik,et al.  Active knee motion after cruciate ligament rupture. Stereoradiography. , 1988, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[5]  D. Tabor,et al.  Friction and molecular structure: the behaviour of some thermoplastics , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  Stefan M. Gabriel,et al.  Three-dimensional determination of femoral-tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  T. Brown,et al.  Mobility and Contact Mechanics of a Rotating Platform Total Knee Replacement , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  P S Walker,et al.  Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Richard D. Komistek,et al.  In Vivo Kinematics for Subjects With and Without an Anterior Cruciate Ligament , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Peter S Walker,et al.  Motion of a mobile bearing knee allowing translation and rotation. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  D A Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Anteroposterior Femorotibial Translation of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Analysis , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Mohamed R. Mahfouz,et al.  In Vivo Fluoroscopic Analysis Of Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Replacements , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  V Pinskerova,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  Mohamed R Mahfouz,et al.  A Multicenter Analysis of Axial Femorotibial Rotation after Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  Mohamed R Mahfouz,et al.  Multicenter Determination of In Vivo Kinematics After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  J D Reuben,et al.  Three-dimensional dynamic motion analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee joint , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[17]  P. Walker,et al.  Motion of the knee after condylar resurfacing--an in vivo study. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  O. Lindahl,et al.  The "screw-home" movement in the knee-joint. , 1966, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[19]  C. J. Bell,et al.  The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  R. N. Stauffer,et al.  Normative data of knee joint motion and ground reaction forces in adult level walking. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  L. Whiteside,et al.  Contact stress analysis in meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  Christof Hurschler,et al.  Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs. , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[23]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Knee biomechanics and total knee replacement. , 1986, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  Johan Kärrholm,et al.  Kinematics of successful knee prostheses during weight-bearing: Three-dimensional movements and positions of screw axes in the Tricon-M and Miller-Galante designs , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[25]  D. Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Fluoroscopic Analysis of the Normal Human Knee , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  S L Woo,et al.  Dynamic behavior of a biphasic cartilage model under cyclic compressive loading. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Haines Rw A note on the actions of the cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. , 1941, Journal of anatomy.

[28]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.